Results 1 to 25 of 454

Thread: Intel's 45nm Prices & Performance

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    411
    I'm disappointed with prices, and max of 8.5X divider if I don't go qx for the quads.

    Honestly, their is not 1 45nm process that I'll be able to get past 3.6Ghz in a reasonable price range. Now with 8.5 being $150 more then 8.0, there is no reason to leave a q6600, the q6600 is the winner for overclockers.

    Unless these can do 500 fsb easily, but I highly doubt that.
    System
    Intel C2D Q6600 @ 3.78Ghz 1.536V (1.55V bios)
    TC PA 120.3 , D-TEK Fusion, MCP655, Micro Res, 6 Yate Fans
    Mushkin HP2-6400 2X2GB @ 100Mhz 5-4-4-12
    Asus Maximus Formula 420x9
    4 Samsung Spinpoint 250GB SATA II in raid 0
    Crossfire HD 2900XT 512MB 900/900 1.25V
    Pioneer DVD-RW
    830 Mobo Tray, Wating on MM Duality
    PC Power and Cooling 750W , mobo/cpu/gpus/cdrom , Powmax 380W , hd, fans, pump
    Acer AL2616W 19200x1200 100Hz (75hz native)

  2. #2
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by gdogg View Post
    I'm disappointed with prices, and max of 8.5X divider if I don't go qx for the quads.

    Honestly, their is not 1 45nm process that I'll be able to get past 3.6Ghz in a reasonable price range. Now with 8.5 being $150 more then 8.0, there is no reason to leave a q6600, the q6600 is the winner for overclockers.

    Unless these can do 500 fsb easily, but I highly doubt that.
    But what if you skipped Q6600 to wait on this bad boy! Let's not forget, 3.6GHz for Penryn will still be very Kick-A$$
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman
    With the two approaches to "how" to design a processor WE are the lucky ones as we get to choose what is important to us as individuals.
    For that we should thank BOTH (AMD and Intel) companies!


    Posted by duploxxx
    I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
    Posted by gallag
    there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
    qft!

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    411
    Quote Originally Posted by Donnie27 View Post
    But what if you skipped Q6600 to wait on this bad boy! Let's not forget, 3.6GHz for Penryn will still be very Kick-A$$
    Very true, but I would pick q6600 over a 8x penryn since with a maximus, (not sure how 45nm fsb is doing atm) and my q6600 over 450FSB is problematic and requires insane nb voltages , 470 1.75 NB isn't even stable ... , pll and fsb voltage won't help either.

    But it would def be a hard choice. I'm gonna keep hoping for a 9X model in $500 price range to appear.
    Last edited by gdogg; 01-07-2008 at 03:40 PM.
    System
    Intel C2D Q6600 @ 3.78Ghz 1.536V (1.55V bios)
    TC PA 120.3 , D-TEK Fusion, MCP655, Micro Res, 6 Yate Fans
    Mushkin HP2-6400 2X2GB @ 100Mhz 5-4-4-12
    Asus Maximus Formula 420x9
    4 Samsung Spinpoint 250GB SATA II in raid 0
    Crossfire HD 2900XT 512MB 900/900 1.25V
    Pioneer DVD-RW
    830 Mobo Tray, Wating on MM Duality
    PC Power and Cooling 750W , mobo/cpu/gpus/cdrom , Powmax 380W , hd, fans, pump
    Acer AL2616W 19200x1200 100Hz (75hz native)

  4. #4
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by gdogg View Post
    Very true, but I would pick q6600 over a 8x penryn since with a maximus, (not sure how 45nm fsb is doing atm) and my q6600 over 450FSB is problematic and requires insane nb voltages , 470 1.75 NB isn't even stable ... , pll and fsb voltage won't help either.

    But it would def be a hard choice. I'm gonna keep hoping for a 9X model in $500 price range to appear.
    Sure, but that's for Drag racers here. Many of us rather just watch the Extreme Guys do it. I don't have water like many here and just depend on a Ninja to do its Best. I don't see myself doing much with a Quad Core but might go that way anyway. I know I want at least 3.1GHz model only overclocking to 3.6GHz is fine for me. I'll still look for others to overclock it to the teeth and cheer them on as they do so. Just because I like NASCAR doesn't mean I want to get out on the track and pretend to be Johnson or Gordon
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman
    With the two approaches to "how" to design a processor WE are the lucky ones as we get to choose what is important to us as individuals.
    For that we should thank BOTH (AMD and Intel) companies!


    Posted by duploxxx
    I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
    Posted by gallag
    there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
    qft!

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •