Quote Originally Posted by Emperor View Post
guys, need some info. the silly errata patch simply means at higher clock speeds, it doesnt freeze up and doesnt affect overclocking?
It doesn't mean higher clocks but it definitely means very bad perf. Like 1.1GHz
Quote Originally Posted by justapost View Post
Also on all my tests i only noted the VA results.

Found it,
http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid...e=expert&pid=4
Will do further tesing with the HD2600XT, to ramp up loads in the 80,5%-81,3% area. 80,8 with +-0,33 (standard deviation) should give me good results.
Very nice. I'd like to know what you find with your testing now (idle/load) for CPU and GFX.
Thank you for all the very details explanations you gave. And allways keep an eye on your boss.
You're welcome.
PS: I ran over your whole thread looking for tlb-errata perfomance comparisons.
Have you ran any benches with/without the patch that showed the impact beside latency and sandra?
I tried it for a few hours (?) maybe an hour at max. It was too bad to continue with, severly slow performance and so I never ran anything else. My system was running on some FAH in the background so I couldn't accept having that bad performance.
Right now since 2-3 days its running WCG non-stop for about a week, so I can't really do anything yet.