Results 1 to 25 of 2003

Thread: Phenom 9500 w/ MSI K9A2 Platinum

Threaded View

  1. #10
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,792
    Here's some more testing.

    Well, look what happened today out of the blue. Set 240HT ref. in BIOS, booted up fine.
    CPU stock, HT stock and NB +0.1V => Prime95 1hr plus stable+temps @ 240HT x 11 = 4 cores 2640MHz, NB at 3120MHz and HT at 2160MHz:


    CPU: 47C
    Ambient: ~20C

    Could've done hours Prime easy but never had time. Ignore EVEREST frequencies. They are obviously higher than 2420MHz I ran in the tests earlier as you will see further down so EVEREST is very buggy if I change my NB/HT speed in BIOS. All settings were only BIOS changed.

    More benchmarks at that setup. Note: no tweaks, I had full services, AV and background processes running as on a usual system you would have. Also RAM is higher latency this time and still single channel.

    BENCH SETUP


    3DMark06: http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/953/dm06vq7.png
    Cinebench 10: http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/704/cbqq1.png
    EVEREST read: http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/37/evnf4.png
    EVEREST write: http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/4567/evwoz9.png
    EVEREST copy: http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/5828/evcce9.png
    EVEREST latency: http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/9015/evlon2.png
    CPU Queen: http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/3564/evqueenfv1.png
    CPU PhotoWorxx: http://img228.imageshack.us/img228/9849/ev1mp0.png ( lower than 2420MHz )
    CPU ZLib: http://img228.imageshack.us/img228/5886/ev2bi8.png
    CPU AES: http://img228.imageshack.us/img228/5944/ev3fo6.png
    FPU Julia: http://img228.imageshack.us/img228/8749/ev4tl7.png
    FPU Mandel: http://img230.imageshack.us/img230/1108/ev5qc0.png
    FPU SinJulia: http://img230.imageshack.us/img230/3424/ev6ak4.png
    Fritz: http://img230.imageshack.us/img230/8113/fritzgn4.png
    ID2: http://img215.imageshack.us/img215/5813/idcgt2.png
    Lightsmark 2007: http://img215.imageshack.us/img215/5634/lmrt4.png
    Nuclearus: http://img215.imageshack.us/img215/6342/numb4.png (look at the frequency it picks up! Soldner you could've at least fixed that )
    POV-Ray 3.7-SSE2: http://img215.imageshack.us/img215/6220/ppsta7.png
    RealStorm2006: http://img215.imageshack.us/img215/8/rsag1.png
    Sandra Arithmetic: http://img215.imageshack.us/img215/4859/safu9.png
    Sandra Multimedia: http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/5180/smtm2.png
    Sandra Cache/Memory: http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/4320/scfo6.png
    SPi 1M: http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/3200/spidd9.png
    Vecmat: http://img236.imageshack.us/img236/3912/vecmatut1.png

    I'll make a table of the scores later for easier comparison but I won't put scaling down because you can't work out CPU frequency scaling with so many variables. But it does scale very well overall I would say.

    Then I did 245 x 11 = 2695MHz and threw ALL voltages to MAX which is around 1.55V each.

    Here's the maxmimum power draw of the system during Prime95 (which is more than in anything else):



    330W AC = ~273W DC

    Yup, it shoots up very high, near my PSU limit.

    Also, the maximum power consumption pulled in a ms was 331W AC and no bench got close to it apart from EVEREST FPU Julia. It pulls the highest power.

    HERE-> what effect does Core speed/NB speed have on L1/L2/L3 cache latency? Compare:

    240HT x 11 = 4 cores 2640MHz, NB=3120MHz, HT=2160MHz, RAM=480 5-5-5-5 2T:


    220HT x 11 = 4 cores 2420MHz, NB=1980MHz, HT=1100MHz, RAM=440 4-4-4-4 2T:


    Very noticeable difference.
    Last edited by KTE; 12-03-2007 at 08:16 AM.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •