we've found THE GOLDEN ONEs : AMD Athlon64 World Record Thread!!

[massman]

@ massman
CAA2C for an Clawhammer isnt good enough...look at my nethands side, i tested one...

Today I got an 3500+ CBAEC 3500+ 0442 WPMW Newcastle --> new start to crack that damned wr...

Huh? . I'm not following

[Turrican]

lol, FX-24

[knopflerbruce]

lol, FX-24

I remember FX57 showed up as FX25 in CPUZ and BIOS a long time ago. I guess this one is only FX24 because of the HTT. So it's an FX56, then?

I wonder what I'll do if it has WR potential. Can't add it as an FX57 on ripping, can I Same problem @ HWBot...

[gianni-gt]

haha to bad bruce, check out my strange scores:

3700+ => http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=131721
3200+ => http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=131752
3700+ => http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=96051

[stunned_guy]

@ Bruce
Sledgehammer have S-Revision

Yesterday I got the 3500+ Clawhammer CAA2C 0507 BPMW and an old 3800+ Newcastle

[Turrican]

haha to bad bruce, check out my strange scores:

3700+ => http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=131721
3200+ => http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=131752
3700+ => http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=96051

rofl, strange cpus

[CCUABIDExORxDIE]

haha to bad bruce, check out my strange scores:

3700+ => http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=131721
3200+ => http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=131752
3700+ => http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=96051

i can explain the venice i think...its an E6 , meaning its a butchered dual core most likely. it was probably a 4800+ that they disabled a core on and then disabled 1/2 cache.

but fx39 and 5300+ are a mystery to me

[gianni-gt]

the 4800+ was shown first as 3200+ renamed at subzero temps and a few days later died.

[stunned_guy]

The 3700+ 0602 gpmw cpu was in my hands first and after some hours under single stage it changed the name in giannis pc. Then it was born as the 5300+

[knopflerbruce]

i can explain the venice i think...its an E6 , meaning its a butchered dual core most likely. it was probably a 4800+ that they disabled a core on and then disabled 1/2 cache.

but fx39 and 5300+ are a mystery to me

I've never seen a xCBxE venice, so I doubt it's a disabled toledo. I never saw a chip with both disabled core AND disabled cache. What a waste lol

These are all strange CPUs lol. FX39 wth? Unlocked or?

I think I can explain my FX24, btw. The normal FX57's sometimes showed up as FX25, and those chips had htt @ 1000 as default. My chip has only 800, so it's an FX24. A bit like the 3500+/3400+'s.

My 3200+ SD is a bit funny as well, don't you think?

*24h till dice action*

[socket]

It's not a normal FX57. CPUZ screen attached. Note that it's 1.41, so it should work properly Also, 800mhz HTT, for some reason. Hope it has NO coldbug

Yeah, when you say it, I've seen B revision, but only 2/8-way Opterons for s940. It also exist E-revisions of those.

To sum it up, I've seen A,B,C,E,K,L,N,R,Y-revisions (s939). The R-chip is my 3700+ newcastle, the only one I've seen with that revision. I also THINK that the old sledgehammers had S-revision, but I'm not sure.

Please send me photo of revisions R,Y and S. I have not seen this revisions. D is exist, I was see 3000+ 754 512k L2 and 3200+ 1MB L2 754 Clawhammers.
AND please what maximal OC is for your FX-24?

[knopflerbruce]

Please send me photo of revisions R,Y and S. I have not seen this revisions. D is exist, I was see 3000+ 754 512k L2 and 3200+ 1MB L2 754 Clawhammers.
AND please what maximal OC is for your FX-24?

I'll take a photo of it during the dice session tomorrow

http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/K8/AMD...700AWBOX).html

Here is a reference, as you can see, R-revision.

Google for YBBLE and you'll see a few venice e3's.

I don't have the FX57 ES yet, it was sent last week I think. From USA, so it'll take a few more days. Which means that I wont be able to test it properly until after Christmas. Need a new DFI Expert lol.

[stunned_guy]

I bought a CBAXC 0437 the other day. Looks like we have alot of duels

Btw, if you have time, can you do a little coldbug research on some cpus? I want to check something... Find the cb at 6-8 temps, like you did with the 170 Just trying to figure out if it's a way to calculate the optimal core temp.

I will test it for you this weekend because i dont still have enough time

[socket]

i see KAB2E, CCBWE, KAB3E, CABGE, KABCE (not in CPU-World). I did not seen any S or R or Y revision.

[knopflerbruce]

Allright, day 1 is over. ALOT of CRAP CPUs were tested, but a very nice 3500+ venice as well

G.I.H. is all I can say.

The cvf files are on the raptor in the garage, but the spi1m run froze after finish so a picture had to be taken. Here it is The validation will be posted tomorrow.

http://hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=62067&thumb=false

[gianni-gt]

damned!!

[stunned_guy]

Congratz

I tried to get this damned 3800+ Newcastle wr but its very hard to get it...18 mhz are left

[gianni-gt]

lost 3500+ wr , won overall prime wr!!!

3751Mhz @ 1.616V * -5°C

3660Mhz @ 1.520V * -8°C

[gianni-gt]

haha just tried my 4000+ rocket on a other board + chiller: watch that: http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=275892 (vcore was 1.584v!!)

[Turrican]

holy crap, this cpu is awesome

[gianni-gt]

little chiller update:

+0°C - 1.616V

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=276029

-8°C @ 1.312V

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=276082

htt @ 383mhz @ 1.52V => +18°C

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=276083

[knopflerbruce]

3700+ @ 3829.7mhz http://hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=62518&thumb=false
Opteron 150 @ 3778.22mhz WR (D.I.H.) http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=276361
Opteron 165 @ 3510mhz WR (T.I.H.) http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=276382
Opteron 175 @ 3654.87mhz WR http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=276370
Opteron 185 @ 3817.6mhz WR (B.I.H.) http://hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=62516&thumb=false

The GODDAMN 3500+ validation @ 3771 mhz was corrupt But I'll see if I have the time to try it later today Should be possible to get a validation at that speed... with a little more voltage perhaps

That CABXE 0602 3200+ was a San Diego btw...... so no venice wr on that one. Doubt it was good enough anyway, but it could run spi @ 3450 or 3500, dont remember.

Edit: Nice scores, gianni!

[gianni-gt]

hehe mr wr hunter

was that the old 3700+? any validations of that 3200+?

and this X.I.H. looks like a running gag

[knopflerbruce]

hehe mr wr hunter

was that the old 3700+? any validations of that 3200+?

and this X.I.H. looks like a running gag

Same old 3700+. With 0.04v more, and about same temps I guess. With lapped pot this time The problem with this chip is that it gets very much hotter from 1.8v to 1.9v. @ 1.85v it's about -30, but -22 @ 1.9v. I hope I can get even closer someday, but I need a little bit better cooling. If I have the cash, I'll buy a nice phase change unit later this month

I learned something about F7. If a file has been stored with the same freq, you're unable to make a new validation at the same clockspeed unless you move the old cpuz file to a different folder, or rename it. I have a feeling some of the other validations "blocked" the SD validations. But I didn't try too hard because it was an SD. Got 3500mhz out of it, but it coldbugged @ -45c @ 1.9v 3550 - freeeeeeze

X.I.H. will go on forever

[Turrican]

crazy results, wr hunter