More intresting performance comparisons...
Computerbase - updated article
If there was any flaw in 2900 AA or AF performance it's been magically (and completely) repaired. And 3800 improves that a little.
More intresting performance comparisons...
Computerbase - updated article
If there was any flaw in 2900 AA or AF performance it's been magically (and completely) repaired. And 3800 improves that a little.
Last edited by Cooper; 11-26-2007 at 11:24 AM. Reason: no need to copy the whole thing here
All the charts are flawed in their design when you use a percentage from the original value.Originally Posted by L7R
If there was any flaw in 2900 AA or AF performance it's been magically (and completely) repaired. And 3800 improves that a little.
Try look at the real numbers instead. The AA issue is still there.
Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.
Driver version or source thanks?Only if it's the latest beta I won't directly write "biased" all over it. I don't think it's possibly to fix it by drivers though but that would be nice. Too bad for ATI though if they've had to sell 2900XT this cheap only since they hadn't gotten out a decent driver in time...
Last edited by RPGWiZaRD; 11-26-2007 at 06:50 AM.
Intel? Core i5-4670K @ 4.3 GHz | ASRock Extreme6 Z87 | G.Skill Sniper 2x8GB @ DDR4-1866 CL9 | Gigabyte GTX 970 OC Windforce 3x | Super Flower Titanium 1000W | ViewSonic VX2268wm 120Hz LCD | Phanteks PH-TC14PE | Logitech MX-518 | Win 7 x64 Professional | Samsung 850 EVO & 840 Pro SSDs
If all people would share opinions in an objective manner, the world would be a friendlier place
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks