I mainly responded to this; "They clarified it to their major business customers, my uncle is one so I'm aware as he told me around September 8th. I posted this back then in the Barcelona thread as well. They said the 40% refers to the same thing you are stating, and they even gave figures for the 2.6GHz version."

That's 2 quarters after BSing Stockholders, Customers and the Investment markets, you name it LOL!

Then you are the one with the misunderstanding here. I said AMD lied, I didn't say if they later clarified or not. They said, not anyone else said for them or misunderstood anything. There wasn't any careful wording or anything.

AMD said and DID what they wanted to, to delay prospective customers decisions on if they should buy current better performing Intel CPU's or wait and see just what AMD was Dancing in the Isles about=P So please, spare me? I don't care what AMD later said, that's the point you're clearly missing. I even said they later fudged. The 40%, 42%, 50% and etc.... was stated in Feb-07. I wasn't talking about what happened in or on Sept 8. You can be 100% correct on what was said then, get it? That changes NOTHING that happened in Jan & Feb-07. Same goes for AM2, $X$ erum 4X4 and etc.....

BTW, most folks thought Intel's Conroes claims were on the Conservative side.