I have seen them come from both sides.... it is my pet peeve -- it is one thing to argue, "hey, look AMD offers a good product for a good price", this is rational.
It is another to dilute the value of the competitor by twisting the data and facts to suit a predetermined view...
It is the sanity of the data and the contextual analysis (or lack thereof), I couldn't careless who it makes look better... just represent it correctly for goodness sake.
When a person selectively pulls one or two observations and extends that generalization as a whole either to prop up or deride one or the other... this is classic Sharikou tact.
Bookmarks