K10 Folding@Home SMP Performance?

[JVguest]

F@H isn't that cache sensitive. I have run it on a E2160 (1MB) and an E6600 (4MB) clocked at the same speed (2.4GHz) and the results on the same WUs were within 4-5% of each other. I would not call that cache dependent.

Hmmm.. a lot of projects run much faster on 4 meg L2 per dual core, Conroe and Kentsfield. 26xx regular console, 1498, and 26xx SMP clients are way slower on 2 meg L2 or less per dual core. My best on 2620,2621 is 3:30 a frame (Kents, 2.96 GHz). Have yet to get a 26xx SMP project on the Kentsfield.