MMM
Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 175

Thread: Superpi score proofs Phenom X4 is a bit faster than Athlon64 X2...

  1. #51
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Edinburgh - UK
    Posts
    1,334
    Quote Originally Posted by Tony View Post
    All I see nowadays is people linking super pi to how good a cpu is, fact is unless you are seriously sad you won't be playing pi every night for 4 to 6 hrs now will you

    AMD are bringing "a platform" not just a cpu that does pi in 8 secs which in reality means very little. if you stand back and see the bigger picture here you will see AMD have changed strategy for a while and really are not that bothered about super pi any more...its just you guys here on XS that are!

    Im looking forward to crossfire X on 790 with a Phenom with a chipset that runs really cool and does not even need a heatsink in most cases and hopfully never running superpi on the machine at all

    [Van diesel]I live my life 8 seconds at a time [/Van Diesel]

    Thing is 1M superpi is now at the stage that it's not really proving very much, and is in general residing as purely a benchmark with an ever waning real world reference. I think we're gonna see a divide on opinions here, those that want a system for "real world applications" likes games and those who are in it for the benchmarks.

    All in all we are being spoiled for choice if you ask me

  2. #52
    Xtremely High Voltage Sparky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ohio, USA
    Posts
    16,040
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornet331 View Post
    celeron 4xx series sucks?
    i dont think so my friend.
    They OC well, so what? A celeron is still a celeron - crap

    The cache is lacking on them. And before you say "yeah well the celeron 4xx has the same L2 as many K8 chips" remember that AMD's architecture does not rely on cache much at all, just doesn't need it near as much. Once you have 512K then any more the performance gains are minimal for most applications. This has been proven when comparing two K8's with the same operating frequency but one had 1MB L2. Intel on the other hand is much more cache dependent so it has a greater performance hit with a lack of cache. I'm no CPU architecture guru - far from it - but I'm thinking part of the reason is due to the lack of an IMC and direct connection to the memory like K8/K10.

    For the same price as a Celeron 440 I can get a Brisbane X2 4000+ 2.1GHz. Plus the boards are cheaper for a decent one. Not a hard choice here.
    Last edited by Sparky; 10-30-2007 at 05:51 AM.
    The Cardboard Master
    Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
    Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz, 16GB DDR3-1600, Radeon 7950 @ 1000/1250, Win 10 Pro x64

  3. #53
    k|ngp|n/Sham my brothers
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Athens---Hellas
    Posts
    5,693
    Thing about Super-Pi is that some guys have said on the upcoming of the Barchie, that stepping B1 or BA did 14sec at 3GHz.......THAT'S why so many ppl are confused.....They are trying to find out from WHERE this 14sec came out and from WHERE this 30k of 3DMark2006 came out.....

    Propably AMD in their labs, had a Yorkfield and after some changings here and there, they though that they were benching with a Barchie or a Phenom and got that numbers....
    INTEL PWA FOR EVER

    Dr. Who my arss...

    .........



  4. #54
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    8,556
    Quote Originally Posted by Vapor View Post
    Great first post. Enjoy a great first ban. Trolling, baiting, and forum-flaming is unacceptable on XS. XS is a place for Xtreme enthusiasts, not trolls.
    PWN Deluxe


    Anyways does SOLDNER-MOFO have anything to say about these SPI scores? did he not see some crazy score form a friend of his?

  5. #55
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Paris
    Posts
    275
    maybe it's time for amd to take the handchief on the phenom logo to dry their tears
    Last edited by Pacha; 10-30-2007 at 06:00 AM.
    ASUS P8P67
    i7 2600K 3.4GHz @ 4.6GHz
    Twintech 8800 GT 512Mo Samsung (vgpu modded)
    Crucial Ballistix DDR3 C7 2 * 2Go
    2 * WD VelociRaptor 150Go RAID 0
    2 * Samsung Spinpoint F3 1To RAID 0
    Creative Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS
    Seasonic S12 600HT


    WC :

    1A-SL2 CPU // 1A-SL2 GPU (home made fix)
    Eheim 1048 + magicool 25
    2 * Black Ice Pro 3 serial
    Tygon 3603 + glycoshell

  6. #56
    k|ngp|n/Sham my brothers
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Athens---Hellas
    Posts
    5,693
    No......It's time to be honest and come out and say: "We have this, we sell it that much and that's it"......Don't put me snakes that will unleach their power and bite you.....Don't put me dogs/cats/etc annimals........Put me a picture of the Phenom and say: "That's it guys....if you want it, get it"......
    INTEL PWA FOR EVER

    Dr. Who my arss...

    .........



  7. #57
    Xtremely High Voltage Sparky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ohio, USA
    Posts
    16,040
    Quote Originally Posted by [XC] riptide View Post
    PWN Deluxe


    Anyways does SOLDNER-MOFO have anything to say about these SPI scores? did he not see some crazy score form a friend of his?
    Someone banned him, for what reason I have no idea... Maybe because he had something good to say about AMD? (I KID! ) I don't know if it is a temp vacation or permanent, heck I don't even know what happened, just logged on one evening and saw "banned" under his username So I don't think we'll be hearing from him for awhile at least.
    The Cardboard Master
    Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
    Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz, 16GB DDR3-1600, Radeon 7950 @ 1000/1250, Win 10 Pro x64

  8. #58
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    Quote Originally Posted by SparkyJJO View Post
    For the same price as a Celeron 440 I can get a Brisbane X2 4000+ 2.1GHz. Plus the boards are cheaper for a decent one. Not a hard choice here.
    hmm not where i live.

    cheapest X2 4000+ 50€
    cheapest cleron 27€.... and for 31€ i get a board...

    on the other hand a Pentium E costs also around 51€.

    you should have compared it to a sempron, the cheapest i can buy costs 24€.

    anyways this goes far to offtopic.

  9. #59
    Xtremely High Voltage Sparky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ohio, USA
    Posts
    16,040
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornet331 View Post
    hmm not where i live.

    cheapest X2 4000+ 50€
    cheapest cleron 27€.... and for 31€ i get a board...

    on the other hand a Pentium E costs also around 51€.

    you should have compared it to a sempron, the cheapest i can buy costs 24€.

    anyways this goes far to offtopic.
    well if you go by cheapest celeron those are definitely less than the X2 4000+ but it also isn't the 4xx series either that you mentioned, so....

    But yes, definitely off topic now......

    OK I need to get my homework done but I'm keep getting distracted... somebody temp ban me until 4 PM EDT today so I can get it done...
    The Cardboard Master
    Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
    Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz, 16GB DDR3-1600, Radeon 7950 @ 1000/1250, Win 10 Pro x64

  10. #60
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,792
    I already expect on the stats that Phenom BA/B2 will lose over Penryn in;
    Multimedia
    Overclocking
    Super Pi (not that I give a damn below 32M although a good extra addition like gold laces on my track shoes )

    At same MHz.

    The only thing that matters to me is real world daily applications which MOST desktop users run at one time or another since that is exactly my interest. Videoing, 3Dmodelling, Imaging, Gaming, Compression, Decompression, Encryption, Decryption, PCMark 04/05, Cache2Cache, Science apps, SYSMark and EVEREST Ultimate benchmark suite as an addition. Sandra, MemTach, CPUMark, CrystalMark, ScienceMark, RealStorm2006, Cinebench9, Cinebench10, AquaMark, 3DMark 01SE/03/05/06, POVRAY, Vecmat, wPrime, CPU-Z latency, Prime95 will also be very helpful for additional info. Also to see power draw at 2.5GHz and 3GHz, volts needed, temps, speed scaling, headroom, coldbug and retail price.

    With any new product you expect improvements. Core 2 over P4 was incredible. People are now stuck in a trance expecting the same each time which is never true but for luck. Penryn is just gaming/multimedia optimized die shrink Core 2 so improved. Pentium 4 631 takes 6.15GHz to do 21 second 1M. Q6600 2.4GHz stock everything with stock DDR2-800 does 21 second 1M. A huge change. To beat that by AMD would be a huge improvement (in what?) like Core over P4 but it means toot to me if done or not.

  11. #61
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    569
    Quote Originally Posted by Vapor View Post
    Great first post. Enjoy a great first ban. Trolling, baiting, and forum-flaming is unacceptable on XS. XS is a place for Xtreme enthusiasts, not trolls.
    I agree.
    Intel Core i7 920 @ 3.8GHz (183x21)
    Gigabyte EX58-DS4 BIOS F5
    3GB PATRIOT PC3-10666 DDR3
    Sapphire Radeon HD4870 512MB BLACK
    2x500GB SEAGATE SATA-II 7200.11
    OCZ GameXstream 750W PSU
    Antec Three Hundred Chassis

  12. #62
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    573
    Quote Originally Posted by BeardyMan View Post
    Superpi means nothing yes

    A P4 670 woudl trash any FX57 in superpi.
    But wich one owns in 3D?

    I guess.... P4


    3DM03 + poor vga

    C2D E6300 @2.8GHz, 2 cores, 1.3vcore AC
    GT1 - Wings of Fury 195.3 fps
    GT2 - Battle of Proxycon 29.1 fps
    GT3 - Troll's Lair 27.6 fps
    GT4 - Mother Nature 40.8 fps

    P4 631 @4.8GHz, HT, 1.3vcore AC
    GT1 - Wings of Fury 190.1 fps
    GT2 - Battle of Proxycon 29.2 fps
    GT3 - Troll's Lair 27.6 fps
    GT4 - Mother Nature 41.0 fps

    Same score with aircooled K8 is IMPOSSIBLE


    Quote Originally Posted by AndreYang View Post
    wtf..your cpu is better.

  13. #63
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    69
    hipro,
    I know you are an xip and all, no dissrespect intended, but you seem to be the ONLY xip on xs who is so in love with Intel. Thier may be others but they keep thier bias to themselves. Why get involved with all the petty bickering?

  14. #64
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,014
    Quote Originally Posted by MaSell View Post
    I guess.... P4


    3DM03 + poor vga

    C2D E6300 @2.8GHz, 2 cores, 1.3vcore AC
    GT1 - Wings of Fury 195.3 fps
    GT2 - Battle of Proxycon 29.1 fps
    GT3 - Troll's Lair 27.6 fps
    GT4 - Mother Nature 40.8 fps

    P4 631 @4.8GHz, HT, 1.3vcore AC
    GT1 - Wings of Fury 190.1 fps
    GT2 - Battle of Proxycon 29.2 fps
    GT3 - Troll's Lair 27.6 fps
    GT4 - Mother Nature 41.0 fps

    Same score with aircooled K8 is IMPOSSIBLE
    Aircooled K8's are running at 3.4-3.5ghz now

  15. #65
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    271
    Quote Originally Posted by hipro5 View Post
    OK..........
    Super-Pi means nothing.........
    3DMark2001 means nothing........
    3DMark2003 means nothing........
    3DMark2005 means nothing........
    3DMark2006 means nothing........
    etc means nothing........

    SO what do we have here?.....A BRAND NEW CPU for Internet downloads?.....Go and buy a Celeron with 25 Euros to do your job.......
    totally agree with you hipro.

    For me it's simple... just post a 3dmark2001 with same gfx and OS.
    That should say all to me...

    _____________________
    Intel Core i5 2500k @ 5ghz (50*100)
    MSI P67A-GD55 B3
    GSKILL 8gb GBNT
    2x Sapphire HD 6870 1gb Crossfire X
    Corsair HX 850
    Corsair H7O
    1xIntel X25-M G2 80 gb (OS)/ 2xSamsung Spinpoint f3 1Tb RAID 0 (Games)/ 2xWestern Digital 2Tb (Storage)/ 1xSamsung Story 1,5Tb (Storage)
    LG W2286L-PF

    Monsters Game - The Battle Between Vampires & Warewolf's MMORPG

  16. #66
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    546
    Quote Originally Posted by hipro5 View Post
    OK..........
    Super-Pi means nothing......... to me
    3DMark2001 means nothing........ to me
    3DMark2003 means nothing........to me
    3DMark2005 means nothing........to me
    3DMark2006 means nothing........to me
    etc means nothing........

    SO what do we have here?.....A BRAND NEW CPU for Internet downloads?.....Go and buy a Celeron with 25 Euros to do your job....... [/
    Fixed. But to be fair, whether the benchmark sucks or not, it does give us some kind of standarized indication to talk numbers, and in the end, that is what drives this industry, not some kind of hocus pocus methodology that says this product is better without fact. If there is a benchmark, a company will try to get an advantage in it, or based on its compiler or architecture, will be optimized for it. With the case of SuperPi, everyone knows Intel chips does much better than their AMD counterparts.

  17. #67
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    573
    Quote Originally Posted by BeardyMan View Post
    Aircooled K8's are running at 3.4-3.5ghz now
    Yes... now

    But we talking about 2yo stuff


    Quote Originally Posted by AndreYang View Post
    wtf..your cpu is better.

  18. #68
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Flying through Space, with armoire, Armoire of INVINCIBILATAAAAY!
    Posts
    1,939
    Quote Originally Posted by BeardyMan View Post
    Superpi means nothing yes

    A P4 670 woudl trash any FX57 in superpi.
    But wich one owns in 3D?

    Actually, I recall a certain Pentium-M owning both in Super Pi, and also being pretty good for games (if not as good for encoding).

    More to do with being able to fit everything into its very fast cache, though.

    Edit: so, to beat Intel at Pi, AMD would probably need to cut their cache latency in half and then some. But then again, AMD isn't so dependent on cache because they have pretty good latency to the RAM.
    Last edited by iddqd; 10-30-2007 at 07:55 AM.
    Sigs are obnoxious.

  19. #69
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    416
    Wow... that 32m is slow ?! I'm sure i get sub 25min with k8 @ 3ghz and rams 250/2-2-2

    I know that phenom has 512k versus 1mb of the a64 3700 but i was pretty darn sure that it would keep up cpc =/

    yes, pi ain't everything but it's a good measurement of raw cpu/ram/mobo combo speed , imo .
    Last edited by Slay0r; 10-30-2007 at 08:02 AM.

  20. #70
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    617
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornet331 View Post
    price/performance, this needs to be determined, but im sure amd will win this one at stock. (for quads)
    fixed

  21. #71
    Xtreme Owner Charles Wirth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    11,656
    Tony, how do you really feel about AMD?

    Heh, I should start a new super pi database.
    Last edited by Charles Wirth; 10-30-2007 at 09:01 AM.
    Intel 9990XE @ 5.1Ghz
    ASUS Rampage VI Extreme Omega
    GTX 2080 ti Galax Hall of Fame
    64GB Galax Hall of Fame
    Intel Optane
    Platimax 1245W

    Intel 3175X
    Asus Dominus Extreme
    GRX 1080ti Galax Hall of Fame
    96GB Patriot Steel
    Intel Optane 900P RAID

  22. #72
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Montenegro
    Posts
    333
    I only care to see real time gaming application performance numbers.

  23. #73
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Santa Clara, C.A
    Posts
    246
    Dissapointing results.

  24. #74
    Diablo 3! Who's Excited?
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Boulder, Colorado
    Posts
    9,412
    Quote Originally Posted by Vapor View Post
    Great first post. Enjoy a great first ban. Trolling, baiting, and forum-flaming is unacceptable on XS. XS is a place for Xtreme enthusiasts, not trolls.
    Whammy!


    Really hoping that vcore isn't correct on CPU-Z. That 32M time really blows though, I'm pretty certain if I had a calculator and a sheet of paper I could calculate it faster. Wonder if it'll be possible to break 3.4GHz with Phenom and ~1.65vcore and some a non-coldbug tuned singlestage.

  25. #75
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    [EU] Latvia, Jelgava
    Posts
    1,689
    Quote Originally Posted by MaSell View Post
    Yes... now

    But we talking about 2yo stuff
    Good Sandiego chip on air+BH5@DDR570+ would do the trick.

Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •