MMM
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 45 of 45

Thread: Sandra 2007 bandwidth results - AM2 and Intel Core 2 Duo

  1. #26
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Budapest, Hungary
    Posts
    252
    pls use Everest 3.50 or newer version... any earlier version has memory read result bug, gives u way too high score... not real result! pls update!
    ASUS P6T Deluxe V2
    INTEL74 CORE I7 920 D0 (3924A346) 20*180MHz ~ 1.176V @ SCYTHE MUGEN2
    3*1GB MUSHKIN XP3 @ 1440MHz CL7-7-7-21 ~ 1.60V
    ZOTAC GeForce GTX260 @ 650/1300/2400MHz ~ ARCTIC COOLING ACCELERO GTX280
    CORSAIR VX-550W

    >>Micron D9 based RAMs and Electromigration<<

    HUNGARY

  2. #27
    Phenom™
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    5,163
    Quote Originally Posted by laragirl83 View Post
    pls use Everest 3.50 or newer version... any earlier version has memory read result bug, gives u way too high score... not real result! pls update!
    If you're referring to my screenshot, then I suggest you do a little research about NUMA before accusing me of posting a "fake" result.....and if you knew anything abou NUMA, you would know that Everest doesn't correctly identify bandwidth in NUMA-enabled computers...

    @ MSI - Thaks....sorry I don't have any recent updates for the Quad Opty rig - it's been quite awhile since I last ran them...I'll update when I get a chance....

  3. #28
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    2,559
    stephen, nobody has called your result a fake, you didnt even ran Everest did you??? Why did you get offended? relax!

    laragirl was referring to Everest benchmark and Read bandwidht bug with 2MB Allendale chips. There are some 2MB allendale scores posted on this thread which show too high read bandwidth.
    So yes please use the latest versions.

    again please keep those results coming!

  4. #29
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Budapest, Hungary
    Posts
    252
    Quote Originally Posted by s7e9h3n View Post
    If you're referring to my screenshot, then I suggest you do a little research about NUMA before accusing me of posting a "fake" result.....and if you knew anything abou NUMA, you would know that Everest doesn't correctly identify bandwidth in NUMA-enabled computers...

    @ MSI - Thaks....sorry I don't have any recent updates for the Quad Opty rig - it's been quite awhile since I last ran them...I'll update when I get a chance....
    no offense, i wasnt talkin' about you specifically!
    and I also didnt say that those benchmarks were made on purpose with earlier version, maybe some of u just didnt know about the issue.
    so i just saw the screenshots and it occured to me, that most of them 3.00.xx version
    i tought i make note
    ASUS P6T Deluxe V2
    INTEL74 CORE I7 920 D0 (3924A346) 20*180MHz ~ 1.176V @ SCYTHE MUGEN2
    3*1GB MUSHKIN XP3 @ 1440MHz CL7-7-7-21 ~ 1.60V
    ZOTAC GeForce GTX260 @ 650/1300/2400MHz ~ ARCTIC COOLING ACCELERO GTX280
    CORSAIR VX-550W

    >>Micron D9 based RAMs and Electromigration<<

    HUNGARY

  5. #30
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Budapest, Hungary
    Posts
    252
    anyway here is mine, with Everest v3.80.934:
    ASUS P6T Deluxe V2
    INTEL74 CORE I7 920 D0 (3924A346) 20*180MHz ~ 1.176V @ SCYTHE MUGEN2
    3*1GB MUSHKIN XP3 @ 1440MHz CL7-7-7-21 ~ 1.60V
    ZOTAC GeForce GTX260 @ 650/1300/2400MHz ~ ARCTIC COOLING ACCELERO GTX280
    CORSAIR VX-550W

    >>Micron D9 based RAMs and Electromigration<<

    HUNGARY

  6. #31
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Pascagoula, Ms
    Posts
    68
    Some of my test
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	!!!tests.gif 
Views:	438 
Size:	15.6 KB 
ID:	57979   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	!!!tests2.gif 
Views:	436 
Size:	21.3 KB 
ID:	57981  


    {AB9 QuadGT * CPU 6320 7x466 @ 3.260Ghz}
    {SuperTalent 2x512 DDR2 PC6400 @ 932Mhz 4-4-4-12 2T}
    {Fatal1ty AN9 32X * CPU 4800+ 11x275 @ 3.025Ghz 2x1g cache}
    {SuperTalent 2x512 PC6400 @ 1039Mhz 5-5-5-15 2T}
    {AN8-V Opte 165 @ 9x300=2705}.{AV8 3200+ Venice 9x300=2704}
    {NI8 805 @ 3.8}....{AG8 630 @ 3.66}....{AS8 640 @ 3870}
    {AN7 @ 2.3}..{HP Laptop 3200 Venice @ 2.0}=F@H 24/7}

  7. #32
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    2,559
    can you do 300x10 with the mem at 1200 that would be insane
    Something like this you mean?

    (btw, it is not on the ASUS 4X4 board)

    It gets even better with higher CPU clock:


    Unbuffered is not bad either:

  8. #33
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    1,943
    ^^what mb was that done on???
    Last edited by msimax; 08-26-2007 at 05:49 PM.
    Amd Nvidia/Ati -3dmark06 scorebord revisted

    asus L1N64-ws or /b depending on bios chip
    4x1gig 8500 gkill bpk
    2x opteron 8224 @ 3.8ghz
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=236
    vga= 8800gt
    winxp pro

    custom chiller -31 water
    2x dtek fuzions
    bix3-with x3panaflo hi output
    antec 850 quattro

    heat under msimax abitmax and dfimax

  9. #34
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    59
    Mine
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	signature.jpg 
Views:	284 
Size:	185.8 KB 
ID:	63507  
    Rig #1
    DFI UTNF4 SLI Dr Expert (Bios 04/06)
    AMD64 3500+ @2.8
    G.Skill F1-4000B1U2 2GB (3-3-3-7 1T @2.7v)
    2 Enermax Liberty 620w PSU's
    Leadtek PX7800GT (2 SLI )

    Rig #2
    DFI LPUT NF590 SLI M2R/G
    Amd64 X2-6000+
    G.Skill F@-6400PHU2-2GBHZ (4-4-4-12)
    Asus EN8800 GTX
    Zippy 850w

  10. #35
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    704
    Why are you posting processor arithmetic scores here??

  11. #36
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    105
    E6300 440 x 7 = 3.08 GHz
    Gigabyte DS3 rev 1, P965 C1
    2 GB A data 8500 at 1100 MHz 5-5-5-9

    Attached Files Attached Files
    Last edited by JVguest; 08-27-2007 at 02:33 AM.

  12. #37
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    59
    Why are you posting processor arithmetic scores here??
    Cause I'm an idiot and posted the wrong screen shot.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	MemBandwidth.JPG 
Views:	263 
Size:	147.2 KB 
ID:	63537  
    Rig #1
    DFI UTNF4 SLI Dr Expert (Bios 04/06)
    AMD64 3500+ @2.8
    G.Skill F1-4000B1U2 2GB (3-3-3-7 1T @2.7v)
    2 Enermax Liberty 620w PSU's
    Leadtek PX7800GT (2 SLI )

    Rig #2
    DFI LPUT NF590 SLI M2R/G
    Amd64 X2-6000+
    G.Skill F@-6400PHU2-2GBHZ (4-4-4-12)
    Asus EN8800 GTX
    Zippy 850w

  13. #38
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    2,559
    msimax,

    link (the 4x4 one)

  14. #39
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,014
    The question might be not needed..but that FX74 it bugged macci?(if you did test that already)

  15. #40
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    704
    Quote Originally Posted by Lancer33 View Post
    Cause I'm an idiot and posted the wrong screen shot.
    Hehe, that's better

  16. #41
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    2,559
    BeardyMan, its not bugged, its NUMA!

  17. #42
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    waukegan
    Posts
    3,607
    Quote Originally Posted by Lancer33 View Post
    Mine


    Quote Originally Posted by LIKMARK View Post
    Why are you posting processor arithmetic scores here??


    Quote Originally Posted by Lancer33 View Post
    Cause I'm an idiot and posted the wrong screen shot.

    lmao
    mobo: strix b350f
    gpu: rx580 1366/2000
    cpu: ryzen 1700 @ 3.8ghz
    ram: 32 gb gskill 2400 @ 3000
    psu: coarsair 1kw
    hdd's: samsung 500gb ssd 1tb & 3tb hdd

  18. #43
    Kin Hell
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by macci View Post
    Something like this you mean?

    (btw, it is not on the ASUS 4X4 board)

    It gets even better with higher CPU clock:


    Unbuffered is not bad either:
    Bloody Hell!!

    Thats just F'kin Awesome bandwidth macci. Amazing results!

    Intrigued as to why the bandwidth Efficiency is so low tho! Can you explain?

    Also, do ya think the next Gen of Intel Chips with their own on-board Memory Controllers will be as good?
    I understood they were scheduled for 1st Quarter '08 when Intel released their Roadmap on the C2D pre-launch!
    Last edited by Kin Hell; 09-03-2007 at 10:18 PM.

  19. #44
    Kin Hell
    Guest
    *Bump* - Did I say something!?!?

  20. #45
    Xtreme 3D Team Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    small town in Indiana
    Posts
    2,285
    Quote Originally Posted by Kin Hell View Post
    *Bump* - Did I say something!?!?
    you might want to read the thread the results are skewed, they are way off due to NUMA. i thought the same thing.lol
    QX 9650 5ghz with 1.55v 4.8ghz with 1.5v 24/7 in a VAPOLI V-2000B+ Single stage phase cooling.
    DFI LP LT X-38 T2R
    2X HD4850's water cooled , volt modded
    Thermaltake 1KW Psu
    4x Seagate 250GB in RAID 0
    8GB crucial ballistix ram

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •