Page 10 of 117 FirstFirst ... 789101112132060110 ... LastLast
Results 226 to 250 of 2903

Thread: Official GIGABYTE X38-DQ6/X38T-DQ6 Info/BIOS Thread

  1. #226
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Burbank, CA
    Posts
    3,766
    http://www.pctuning.cz/index.php?opt...1&limitstart=1

    in this review of the retail board, this guy shows a pic of the X38 with the IHS off, and gigabyte is using the ES chips............look at the HSF of the X38, says ES.............i knew it, they are using the older revisions of the chip, im sure eventually they will change this, but early boards seem to be the ES chips..............could someone remove there heatsink to find out if they are using the ES chips on their retail boards, thanks!

  2. #227
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    71
    Quote Originally Posted by zsamz_ View Post
    i got 550fsb on day 1 i also reinstaled xp like 4 times in a week

    i just want this damn thing running on 4 sticks @ stock settings
    I didn't say it's not possible or that the board is not currently capable of it as it clearly is. There are plenty of people having troubles with this and other X38 boards who can't hit 500 and as a consequence are returning or selling them. I'm simply saying time will solve these issues. And BTW I wasn't specifically talking about this board but rather all boards these days that are almost always expected to hit 500+ the day they're released.
    Last edited by QWIDGYBO; 10-09-2007 at 01:37 PM.

  3. #228
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Moose Jaw, SK CA
    Posts
    152
    Quote Originally Posted by GAR View Post
    http://www.pctuning.cz/index.php?opt...1&limitstart=1

    in this review of the retail board, this guy shows a pic of the X38 with the IHS off, and gigabyte is using the ES chips............look at the HSF of the X38, says ES.............i knew it, they are using the older revisions of the chip, im sure eventually they will change this, but early boards seem to be the ES chips..............could someone remove there heatsink to find out if they are using the ES chips on their retail boards, thanks!


    When I get my mobo in a few days, I'll remove and post a some pics
    RIG 1: Asus Rampage Extreme X48
    RIG 2: Foxconn BloodRage X58
    E8600 Q820A349 @ 4.75Ghz: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=596270

  4. #229
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Portishead, Bristol, England
    Posts
    3,248
    Quote Originally Posted by GAR View Post
    http://www.pctuning.cz/index.php?opt...1&limitstart=1

    in this review of the retail board, this guy shows a pic of the X38 with the IHS off, and gigabyte is using the ES chips............look at the HSF of the X38, says ES.............i knew it, they are using the older revisions of the chip, im sure eventually they will change this, but early boards seem to be the ES chips..............could someone remove there heatsink to find out if they are using the ES chips on their retail boards, thanks!
    I'll do it now

  5. #230
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    17,242
    LOL people

    i can't believe you are ing out so quick

    this boards is crazy good

    i have NEVER been able to do this with RAM before and never had this SuperPi efficiency








    T_M you killed your board with condensation i think........that is where mine sweats bit time but i have LET on there

    i LOOOOOOOOOOVE my board
    Team.AU
    Got tube?
    GIGABYTE Australia
    Need a GIGABYTE bios or support?



  6. #231
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Moose Jaw, SK CA
    Posts
    152
    Quote Originally Posted by dinos22 View Post
    LOL people

    i can't believe you are ing out so quick

    this boards is crazy good

    i have NEVER been able to do this with RAM before and never had this SuperPi efficiency




    T_M you killed your board with condensation i think........that is where mine sweats bit time but i have LET on there

    i LOOOOOOOOOOVE my board


    I agree, this is a killer mobo put in the right hands


    btw Nice o'c !
    RIG 1: Asus Rampage Extreme X48
    RIG 2: Foxconn BloodRage X58
    E8600 Q820A349 @ 4.75Ghz: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=596270

  7. #232
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Portishead, Bristol, England
    Posts
    3,248
    Took a bit of effort as im new to DSLR and had to use manual focus.



    Mobo is REV 1.0

  8. #233
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Moose Jaw, SK CA
    Posts
    152
    RIG 1: Asus Rampage Extreme X48
    RIG 2: Foxconn BloodRage X58
    E8600 Q820A349 @ 4.75Ghz: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=596270

  9. #234
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Moose Jaw, SK CA
    Posts
    152
    Quote Originally Posted by Pete View Post
    Took a bit of effort as im new to DSLR and had to use manual focus.


    Mobo is REV 1.0





    Obviously not ES
    RIG 1: Asus Rampage Extreme X48
    RIG 2: Foxconn BloodRage X58
    E8600 Q820A349 @ 4.75Ghz: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=596270

  10. #235
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Portishead, Bristol, England
    Posts
    3,248
    Quote Originally Posted by JPxM0Dz View Post
    Obviously not ES
    Don't be so sure as it's coming up on what database i can access that is it! Infact its showing as recall

  11. #236
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Moose Jaw, SK CA
    Posts
    152
    Quote Originally Posted by Pete View Post
    Don't be so sure as it's coming up on what database i can access that is it! Infact its showing as recall

    Interesting, keep us updated
    RIG 1: Asus Rampage Extreme X48
    RIG 2: Foxconn BloodRage X58
    E8600 Q820A349 @ 4.75Ghz: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=596270

  12. #237
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Portishead, Bristol, England
    Posts
    3,248
    Quote Originally Posted by JPxM0Dz View Post
    Interesting, keep us updated
    My EX that works for Intel and a few others i know at varying Intel locations are looking into it for me, but so far she said that they called all of them back...

    The IHS is also stamped 06 which aparntly on paper should be 07

  13. #238
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    67
    F3H bios for X38T-DQ6

    http://pic.xfastest.com/hicookie/Gigabyte/x38tdq6.f3h

    i love this board


    QX6850 9X400
    TT 760i CPU WATER COOLING
    GIGABYTE X38T-DQ6 F3H
    ADATA DDR3-1600+ 1GBX2@1600 6.6.5.12
    SEAGATE IDE 40GB 8MB
    ATI HD 2900XT CROSSFIRE 850/950,PCIE 100MHZ



    Blitz EX sets

    QX6850 8X450
    TT 760i CPU WATER COOLING
    Asus Blitz ex
    ADATA DDR3-1600+ 1GBX2@1800 7.6.5.15
    Hitachi IDE 400GB 8MB
    ATI HD 2900XT CROSSFIRE 850/950,PCIE 130MHZ




    534FSB Pi without tweaking
    Last edited by GTX; 10-09-2007 at 04:33 PM.

  14. #239
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Burbank, CA
    Posts
    3,766
    So the X38 is recalled by intel????

  15. #240
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Moose Jaw, SK CA
    Posts
    152
    Quote Originally Posted by GAR View Post
    So the X38 is recalled by intel????

    I highly doubt that, if so I'd love for someone offer up some documented info showing this to be the case.

    This is the only info I could find regarding any related issues with the X38

    http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?op...3063&Itemid=37

    According to a list of errata's that we've seen from Intel with regards to its X38 chipset, there's a problem with some PCIe cards and the x16 PCI Express slots. There's no real need to worry though, as graphcis cards will work just fine.

    Intel isn't planning on fixing the issue either, since it's aparently only related to some x4 and x8 cards, such as RAID controllers and dual or quad network cards and these aren't really intended for the X38 chipset.

    There are some other minor issues with the chipset and according to some of the motherboard manufacturers we've talked to, there are some problems when it comes to making their own board designs as Intel hasn't proveded a design kit this time around.

    It almost sounds as if Intel doesn't wan't its board partners to succeed in creating top-notch board so that Intel can steal some market share with its own X38 board, or will it be X48?
    Last edited by JPxM0Dz; 10-09-2007 at 05:35 PM. Reason: Update
    RIG 1: Asus Rampage Extreme X48
    RIG 2: Foxconn BloodRage X58
    E8600 Q820A349 @ 4.75Ghz: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=596270

  16. #241
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Acreageville, Alberta
    Posts
    1,411
    Finally got some time to mess with this board (it sat for two weeks ) and it booted first try @ 400FSB on my Q6000 and is stable.

    Hope to get into the real OCing later this week. So far I am liking this board, but had some issues getting RAID working. Had to find which ports it would allow me to use.

  17. #242
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Moose Jaw, SK CA
    Posts
    152
    Quote Originally Posted by turtletrax View Post
    Finally got some time to mess with this board (it sat for two weeks ) and it booted first try @ 400FSB on my Q6000 and is stable.

    Hope to get into the real OCing later this week. So far I am liking this board, but had some issues getting RAID working. Had to find which ports it would allow me to use.

    Thanks for the heads up!

    btw which ports ended up working for you in raid0 ?
    RIG 1: Asus Rampage Extreme X48
    RIG 2: Foxconn BloodRage X58
    E8600 Q820A349 @ 4.75Ghz: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=596270

  18. #243
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    67
    F5g for X38-DQ6
    improve Q6700/Q6600 FSB OC
    http://asia.giga-byte.com/FileList/B...6_f5g_beta.exe

  19. #244
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    166
    G'day,

    I've been reading this thread with interest as I have an X38-DQ6 myself.
    My rig is in the sig.

    This is the best (rock solid) I've got it so far.


    This is a great forum, good info to be found here.

    Will reboot now and try this new bios rev.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    CoolerMaster Stacker 830SE|Antec Signature 850W|Gigabyte X58A-UD5 F5 slic2.1
    Intel Core i7 930 16x200@3,200Mhz|vcore 1.14|Intel Stock CPU Cooler
    GSKILL DDR3 Perfect Storm 2000 @6-6-6-16-1T 1600Mhz|ATI 5870 1024MB 850/1200
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64 bootdisk: Crucial RealSSD-C300 128GB SATA-III

  20. #245
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    185
    Mine has the same revision X38 chipset as above, and is also stamped with a 06 date code. Mine was from the 3nd batch that ClubIt recieved...

  21. #246
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    674
    What´s the best working bios for dual core today för X38-DQ6 ??
    [SIGPIC]http://techsweden.org[/SIGPIC]
    Gigabyte Z87X-OC, Haswell 4770K, 8GB Team Group 2666mhz, Asus HD7970

  22. #247
    Dave's Mentor!
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    montreal
    Posts
    5,247
    Quote Originally Posted by Turbodream View Post
    What´s the best working bios for dual core today för X38-DQ6 ??
    if you like high fsb its f3 but u better set subtimings manually for full stability

    maximus IV extreme gtx580
    gigabut p67-ud7
    p67 sabertooth
    2500k+2600k
    antec 1200watt
    EVGA classified 760
    920 Batch# 3849B018 4.985ghz@1.52v gtx285 ftw sli
    OCZ3RPR1866LV6GK hypers
    dfi ut p35 rampage extreme
    gigabut p35c-ds3r bios suks
    gigabut x38-d6q dead thank god
    ballistix 8500 1240mhz@2.02v

  23. #248
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Portishead, Bristol, England
    Posts
    3,248
    Intel pulled all X38s back hense why there was a delay. When i did pop the HSF what ever off there was imprint on any thermal pads, not one mosfet mark letalone anything off the NB or SB.


    If i still have this bord when my new RAM arrives i'll give it a go but i think it's the bord. Guess we will see

  24. #249
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    17,242
    Quote Originally Posted by zsamz_ View Post
    if you like high fsb its f3 but u better set subtimings manually for full stability
    i don't set them
    only main timings

    F3 is great and fast too
    Team.AU
    Got tube?
    GIGABYTE Australia
    Need a GIGABYTE bios or support?



  25. #250
    Dave's Mentor!
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    montreal
    Posts
    5,247
    Quote Originally Posted by dinos22 View Post
    i don't set them
    only main timings

    F3 is great and fast too
    mind you i do not beleive its 100% stable all my tests passed but my windows takin longer n longer to shutdown
    and i think those other boises are a joke they fix 1 thing n mess up another
    i'll be patient n wait another week before i return the board by p35 had better performance n was rock solid n ran 4 sticks @ 1040mhz @ 4-4-4-10-2-2-5-26n i cant this one doin 800hmz
    i doin 1 more reinstall if it messes up its gone lol

    maximus IV extreme gtx580
    gigabut p67-ud7
    p67 sabertooth
    2500k+2600k
    antec 1200watt
    EVGA classified 760
    920 Batch# 3849B018 4.985ghz@1.52v gtx285 ftw sli
    OCZ3RPR1866LV6GK hypers
    dfi ut p35 rampage extreme
    gigabut p35c-ds3r bios suks
    gigabut x38-d6q dead thank god
    ballistix 8500 1240mhz@2.02v

Page 10 of 117 FirstFirst ... 789101112132060110 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •