Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 51 to 75 of 75

Thread: The first published 2P Barcelona 3dmark06 test result - here, on XS

  1. 09-28-2007, 07:16 AM #51
    PanteraGSTK
    PanteraGSTK is offline
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    784
    I've always been AMD biased. I built my first pc with an Asus cusl2 and a celly 533mhz (last time I listen to tom's hardware) and I hated it. I went with amd since then and love them. A company a fraction the size of intel and it was kicking the crap out of them in the enthusiast sector. Then I needed a new system and core 2 came out. I went back to intel. AMD needs to hurry and release something. I'd like to have both, but won't waste money on inferior cpu's. Especially if they are going to change the socket on me once a year...
    100% OC

    Max OC on my crappy S3 1.8v vcore DICE cooling

    Come crunch with us. Click me to find out more.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 09-28-2007, 07:20 AM #52
    perkam
    perkam is offline
    Live Long And Overclock
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    14,058
    Send a message via MSN to perkam Send a message via Yahoo to perkam
    Opteron 1000 proccies are code named Budapest I believe.

    We won't see comparable cpu results until AMD get beyond the current rev in q1 08, which is when they'll launch the 2.0 Ghz - 2.6Ghz Quads.

    Perkam
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 09-28-2007, 07:50 AM #53
    Hornet331
    Hornet331 is offline
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    Send a message via ICQ to Hornet331
    Quote Originally Posted by MR_SmartAss View Post
    Well done. Using Sharikou's logic you came to the conclusion that Phenom is te real deal.....


    but the doctor isnt as funny anymore as he was.... no more Intel 2Q08 BK allegations...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 09-28-2007, 08:09 AM #54
    BitpowerPM
    BitpowerPM is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    DE
    Posts
    147
    Quote Originally Posted by BeardyMan View Post
    It's fair to say that Phenom will be teh real deal
    You forgot 'low cost'.
    PC: Asus DSGC-DW, Dual Intel Xeon E5345, 4x1 GB FB-DIMM DDR2-667, 4x250 GB RAID10 + 250 GB backup, 8800 GT -.-
    PC: Intel P4C 2,4 @ 3,0 GHz, 2 GB DDR400, GF FX5900 XT (477/777 MHz), 320 GB disk space
    Server: Intel PM 745 1,8 @ 2,4 GHz, 256 MB DDR-266, onboard i855GME graphics, 200 GB disk space ^^
    Notebook: Intel PM 735, 1 GB DDR333, Radeon 9650, 80 GB disk space
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 09-30-2007, 10:19 AM #55
    IvanAndreevich
    IvanAndreevich is offline
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Vancouver, Canada
    Posts
    3,858
    Quote Originally Posted by BeardyMan
    1600FSB-->LOL
    200FSB LOL
    I wish you could realize what a noob you are for saying that First one is 400 MHz quad pumped, and the second is not even an FSB at all.
    i5 750 4.20GHz @ NH-D14 | 8GB | P7P55DLE | 8800U | Indilinx SSD + Samsung F3 | HAF922 + CM750W
    Past: Q6600 @ 3.60 E6400 @ 3.60 | E6300 @ 3.40 | O165 @ 2.90 | X2 4400+ @ 2.80 | X2 3800+ @ 2.70 | VE 3200+ @ 2.80 | WI 3200+ @ 2.75 | WI 3000+ no IHS @ 2.72 | TBB 1700+ @ 2.60 | XP-M 2500+ @ 2.63 | NC 2800+ @ 2.40 | AB 1.60GHz @ 2.60
    Quote Originally Posted by CompGeek
    The US is the only country that doesn't use [nuclear weapons] to terrorize other countries. The US is based on Christian values, unlike any other country in the world. Granted we are straying from our Christian heritage, but we still have a freedom aimed diplomatic stance.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 09-30-2007, 11:42 PM #56
    Teqqles
    Teqqles is offline
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    39
    I think I'll reserve judgement for now, it would be nice for the K10 to be able to match anything Intel throw at it, purely from a competitive point of view, then we'll be able to pick whatever flavour appeals to us more. Currently my build is still going Q6600 though and it doesn't look like there will be a reply from AMD soon enough to effect that choice...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 10-01-2007, 02:19 AM #57
    BeardyMan
    BeardyMan is offline
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,014
    Quote Originally Posted by IvanAndreevich View Post
    I wish you could realize what a noob you are for saying that First one is 400 MHz quad pumped, and the second is not even an FSB at all.
    I'm a noob, i won't deny, that.

    But i was rather aiming to the old standard AMD is using, for how many years now are they using the 200Mhz*X? a long time while Intel still pumps it up...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 10-01-2007, 07:53 AM #58
    VulgarHandle
    VulgarHandle is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Dallas, TX USA
    Posts
    1,381
    Quote Originally Posted by BeardyMan View Post
    I'm a noob, i won't deny, that.

    But i was rather aiming to the old standard AMD is using, for how many years now are they using the 200Mhz*X? a long time while Intel still pumps it up...
    we do the pumping up for AMD
    Athlon XP-M 2500+ 0343MPMW The King is Dead!
    Phenom II X6 1090T 1025GPMW Long Live the King!
    -------------------------------------------
    I'm from the church of the operating room
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 10-01-2007, 11:44 AM #59
    Donnie27
    Donnie27 is offline
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by BeardyMan View Post
    I'm a noob, i won't deny, that.

    But i was rather aiming to the old standard AMD is using, for how many years now are they using the 200Mhz*X? a long time while Intel still pumps it up...
    Pump it, Pump it real good, Hey, Intel must be pumping it right, they've made a lot a money.
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman
    With the two approaches to "how" to design a processor WE are the lucky ones as we get to choose what is important to us as individuals.
    For that we should thank BOTH (AMD and Intel) companies!


    Posted by duploxxx
    I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
    Posted by gallag
    there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
    qft!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 10-01-2007, 12:11 PM #60
    knightwolf654
    knightwolf654 is offline
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Warren,MI
    Posts
    561
    well considering that the barc. CPU's have a lot of stuff turned off. HT3 being one of them this is not bad at all!
    cant wait till someone gets their hands on a phenom
    cpu- Intel I7 3930K
    Asus P9x79 Deluxe
    2x HD7970
    32gb ddr3-1600
    corsair ax1200
    Corsair 800D
    Corsair H100 lapped
    2x 128gb M4 raid 0
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 10-01-2007, 12:53 PM #61
    GoThr3k
    GoThr3k is offline
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Belgium, Dendermonde
    Posts
    1,292
    Quote Originally Posted by Donnie27 View Post
    Pump it, Pump it real good, Hey, Intel must be pumping it right, they've made a lot a money.
    relevance to thread?

    => none,more Intel BS
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 10-01-2007, 05:15 PM #62
    Donnie27
    Donnie27 is offline
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by GoThr3k View Post
    relevance to thread?

    => none,more Intel BS
    I didn't bring up Intel, BeardyMan did. If you don't like it, please make that same post and request to him?

    But i was rather aiming to the old standard AMD is using, for how many years now are they using the 200Mhz*X? a long time while Intel still pumps it up...
    Now. Are you really that biased?
    Last edited by Donnie27; 10-02-2007 at 11:45 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman
    With the two approaches to "how" to design a processor WE are the lucky ones as we get to choose what is important to us as individuals.
    For that we should thank BOTH (AMD and Intel) companies!


    Posted by duploxxx
    I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
    Posted by gallag
    there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
    qft!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 10-01-2007, 09:24 PM #63
    tictac
    tictac is offline
    Fused
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    2,769
    native quad pump fsb.. pump it up to 400mhz .. yeah 1600 front side bus.. hehe
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 10-01-2007, 10:11 PM #64
    v0dka
    v0dka is offline
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    1,778
    Quote Originally Posted by BeardyMan View Post
    I'm a noob, i won't deny, that.

    But i was rather aiming to the old standard AMD is using, for how many years now are they using the 200Mhz*X? a long time while Intel still pumps it up...
    It's good that you know yourself, because you obviously are one.

    Try to understand hypertransport and then come back.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 10-02-2007, 01:42 AM #65
    SunFlowerSeeds
    SunFlowerSeeds is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    105
    200MHz is on the low side but most people will simply running it 600MHz - 1000MHz.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  16. 10-02-2007, 01:53 AM #66
    savantu
    savantu is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,730
    Quote Originally Posted by hardrail View Post
    Agreed. I need a new system bad, and I want to wait for Phenom, but dang!!!
    Phenom moved to Q1 2008.



    http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquir...ch-2007-whoops
    Quote Originally Posted by Heinz Guderian View Post
    There are no desperate situations, there are only desperate people.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  17. 10-02-2007, 01:57 AM #67
    informal
    informal is offline
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Moved?WHere does it say?Or you concluded it with non existing slide that Inq didn't recieve?
    Didn't you find it a little odd that the Phenom CPU/RV670 GPU combo is missing,and the RV670 is coming in November??Doess this means RV670 is moved to Q1 too??
    Right..
    Bulldozer IPC decrease procedure ! <=Terrace posted way too much
    My latest blog
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  18. 10-02-2007, 02:42 AM #68
    Blasar
    Blasar is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    117
    I see only 45W products (?).

    Where are the rest?
    Last edited by Blasar; 10-02-2007 at 03:00 AM.
    Sorry for my poor english.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  19. 10-02-2007, 02:55 AM #69
    informal
    informal is offline
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Better ask where is RV670 on those roadmaps,since it is coming in November
    Bulldozer IPC decrease procedure ! <=Terrace posted way too much
    My latest blog
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  20. 10-02-2007, 03:52 AM #70
    KTE
    KTE is offline
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,792
    That doesn't offer anything to refute what AMD has said since July. Phenom FX and then Phenom. They have "upto 2.6GHz planned" for this year, and I'm not sure if that applies to the 10h family of products overall or just Barcelona Opteron.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  21. 10-02-2007, 09:10 AM #71
    DoubleZero
    DoubleZero is offline
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    458
    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    Moved?WHere does it say?Or you concluded it with non existing slide that Inq didn't recieve?
    Just let the man do his job
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  22. 10-04-2007, 10:45 AM #72
    MAS
    MAS is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    prospekt Veteranov, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
    Posts
    494
    Send a message via ICQ to MAS
    single cpu result added - see the first post
    2907 at 1995MHz and HTT=1x
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  23. 10-04-2007, 02:56 PM #73
    knightwolf654
    knightwolf654 is offline
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Warren,MI
    Posts
    561
    authenticate please.
    cpu- Intel I7 3930K
    Asus P9x79 Deluxe
    2x HD7970
    32gb ddr3-1600
    corsair ax1200
    Corsair 800D
    Corsair H100 lapped
    2x 128gb M4 raid 0
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  24. 10-06-2007, 11:42 PM #74
    MAS
    MAS is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    prospekt Veteranov, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
    Posts
    494
    Send a message via ICQ to MAS
    some tests added

    progs links

    http://slil.ru/24945619
    http://slil.ru/24945621

    taken from thread http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...158051&page=37
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  25. 10-07-2007, 04:39 AM #75
    BitpowerPM
    BitpowerPM is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    DE
    Posts
    147

    only single threaded

    Vecmat is only single-threaded. :/

    My scores:

    Dual Clovertown @ 2,33 GHz:

    Dual Clovertown @ 2,00 GHz:


    Clear advantage @ SSE operations compared to Barcelona.
    Barcelona do better in the other tests without SSE.

    cu BitpowerPM
    PC: Asus DSGC-DW, Dual Intel Xeon E5345, 4x1 GB FB-DIMM DDR2-667, 4x250 GB RAID10 + 250 GB backup, 8800 GT -.-
    PC: Intel P4C 2,4 @ 3,0 GHz, 2 GB DDR400, GF FX5900 XT (477/777 MHz), 320 GB disk space
    Server: Intel PM 745 1,8 @ 2,4 GHz, 256 MB DDR-266, onboard i855GME graphics, 200 GB disk space ^^
    Notebook: Intel PM 735, 1 GB DDR333, Radeon 9650, 80 GB disk space
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules