Yeah, ok. From my end it seems more like you just want to be accepted as legal genius (as an anonymous poster, of course) and not questioned. Especially with each post informing me of my closed-minded retardation. I had no idea I was so unwilling to learn.
I just see it as unlikely that even if the warranty is useless to Intel that a court would let me have a new CPU after I knowingly used it improperly. Of course, I suppose what is proper usage is up for debate.
So, by what you say, warranties don't really exist for any purpose other than as a consumer scare tool? I can do whatever I want with a product as long as said use is not explicity forbidden within a contract. And if I'm willing to go to court over it after the company denies me, I can get a free replacement .
Bookmarks