very nice review!
very nice review!
The TEC cooler is in there because its part of the air cooling catagory
No unfortunatly i could not do it based on one mount, certain mounts just dont work with certain heatsinks, as far as it being a variable.... not really, in my opinion, unless the mounting system was so bad that it adversely effected performance, it should not have been an issue.
During the second set of tests that im currently gathering, im also gona do price charts, and mounting system info, so if you do happen to select a heatsink based off the list, you know what your getting ahead of time.![]()
Spawne.
My bad, wasn't clear....
I meant, how many times did you remove/replace TIM & each heat sink to the CPU and record results?
Personally, I think you need to remount the TIM & HSF at least 3x, record results & then average....
All of this stuff will be added in the next updateim making notes as we go along for all the information i gotta add
![]()
nice read.
DFI LT X38 qx6850 @ 3.6g TJ-07BW
PA120.3/mcp655/GTX/mcw30+Tline+GSkill 4g
AHFDx2, 1T Samsung F1x2, Evga 8800gtx, W0132RU
Dell e1705 t7400 2g 200gHD 7900gs
http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=45541
Good news guys, the mail just came and dropped off one of my international heatsinks :p this might be new for us USA guys, as they deal exclusively for europe atm.
trying to help bump the knowledge of their products here in the USA
great job.
Did you use just one fan for the Ultra 120x ?
Yes, im gona need to elaborate more on what those #'s and such are after the heatsink names are
the First thing you will see after the heatsink name is the fan model the second thing is in what orientation the fan was, if there is more then one fan it will be noted, such as
Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme D12SM-12 PUSH (1 fan, pushing air through the heatsink)
Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme D12SM-12 PUSH/PULL (2 fans, 1 fan pushing through the heatsink, the other on the opposite side pulling air through.)
![]()
I did the testing on the two tonight for passive, both failed miserably, basically they just heated up, and continued to heat up, and even after it passed the thermal limit of the tests, it only cooled down 5c, this is even with a fan simulating an intake fan, blowing from a few inches away across the heatsink.
Im gona try with some low speed yate loons now, see how the numbers turn out.
that sucks. Weird, my Ultra 120(4pipes) could passively cool my 89W Opteron with a 200mhz OC(2.2ghz). Temps never reached more than 55C. I've since switched to an AM2 chip, and until last week, was using the Ultra 120 passive, but I've switched to the HR-01 Plus. It cools the X2 4000+ perfectly fine at stock settings passively, but I'm on an undervolting kick.
edit: strange temps you're seeing. My friend has an Ultra 120 Extreme installed on his B3 Q6600, and when he SMP folds the chip only reaches 44C. He's got one fan mounted on the U120X in a pull position, and the rear case fan acts as an intake feeding fresh air from ~ 4inches away at 900rpm to the other side of the heatsink.
Last edited by ryboto; 09-15-2007 at 08:03 PM.
I can tell you whats going on, first of all you cant compare an opteron to a B3 Quad core, these things produce tremendous heat, AMD's run naturally cool, so thats only expected. As far as your friends quad core, im gona go out on a limb here and say that when he SMP Folds, hes not using all 4 cores. The program is probably not designed to utilize all those cores, probably only two, when he runs the program, have him check and see what the CPU stress is on each core, id be interested to see that. On all my tests im priming all 4 cores using Prime95, so its maximum heat load.![]()
please consider adding overclocked and overvolted results to your charts...
I don't really care about stock speed/volts... I want to see how the heatsinks handle under pressure... that TEC sink isn't gonna be the best performer when you add vCore
SMP folding (Linux SMP client) is designed for 4 cores... not sure about the Windows SMP client because it is unstable and inefficient compared to the Linux version so I've never bothered with it
CPU: Q9450 · D-Tek Fuzion (Quad Accelerator nozzle)
RAM: 2x 2GB CSX Diablo PC3-16000
GPU: 2x BFG 8800GTX 768MB OC SLI · 2x Swiftech MCW60
Mobo: Asus Striker II Extreme · EK-NB S-MAX Acetal (NB) · 2x EK-Mosfet ASUS 3 Acetal (MOSFETs)
Loop 1 (CPU): Swiftech MCP-655 · Swiftech MCR-220 · Custom Fibreglass Air Intake
Loop 2 (2xGPU + MOSFETs + NB): Laing D5 · Thermochill PA120.3
Audio/PSU: SB X-Fi XtremeMusic (Hotrodded, Creative/Pax-Fi) · PCP&C Silencer 750
Spawne, isn't that Coolink heatsink exactly the same as in Noctua, the only difference being the fan? Oh, and less heatpipes too.
Last edited by saapas; 09-16-2007 at 04:40 AM.
In task manager, it shows that all 4 cores are being stressed...SMP F@H uses 4 folding cores, and if you have 4 physical cores, each core will be fully utilized. I was there when we set it up, so I know it's fully loaded. The frame times of ~11-15 minutes depending on WU also suggest to me that it's fully loaded. He doesn't overclock, so I just assumed this was normal.
Last edited by ryboto; 09-16-2007 at 05:22 AM.
The overclocked results will be added on the next set of tests, im gona take the top 5 heatsinks off of the charts, and pit them against each other with the maximum heat load during overclockingThat should be somewhere above 3ghz with 1.5v
vapor thinks it is a similar design, only thing i can tell you is rascom does both noctua and coolink
push/push as in both fans pushing into the heatsink in apposing fashions?
Bookmarks