Page 19 of 46 FirstFirst ... 91617181920212229 ... LastLast
Results 451 to 475 of 1126

Thread: Here's a little teaser....

  1. #451
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,341
    Quote Originally Posted by s7e9h3n View Post
    A rd790 board shouldn't be a problem for me to get, BUT a 2s rd790 board is impossible to land....



    CPU-Z is giving a bugged reading and the DC opties are running in my Asus L1N64



    If the bios is from Tyan, you're going to have some major issues booting the board. The Tyan I used was running a custom bios from AMD which [allegedly ] allowed the cpu's to function properly.
    yep same here... tyan system with special AMD bios. and 0 options to control
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman View Post
    Fanboyitis..
    Comes in two variations and both deadly.
    There's the green strain and the blue strain on CPU.. There's the red strain and the green strain on GPU..

  2. #452
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Devon
    Posts
    3,437
    Quote Originally Posted by tsuehpsyde View Post
    An update for what it's worth. The motherboard we're using is a Supermicro H8DME (but the POST screen says H8DM8, oddly enough). Either way, we flashed it with the newest BIOS from 9/7/07 and now it works. Old BIOS was 11/28/06, so there's a clue to why it wouldn't even turn on before. Got a set of 2347s with 16GB of PC5300 ECC in there, and they're now building out the server to install an OS on it and start testing it. As far as working properly, we'll have to see but the BIOS is counting 8 cores. I took pics, but they're on the phone, so I'll have to get them off when I get home tonight if I can figure out how.

    Just letting s7 and Dave know in case they want to know of another board that works. If the machine gets setup and I have access to it, I'll run what tests I can, but we'll see what they're doing with it first.
    Hah! Good news!

    When we can expect another update from you? Are you gonna install Windows based OS or Linux?

    RiG1: Ryzen 7 1700 @4.0GHz 1.39V, Asus X370 Prime, G.Skill RipJaws 2x8GB 3200MHz CL14 Samsung B-die, TuL Vega 56 Stock, Samsung SS805 100GB SLC SDD (OS Drive) + 512GB Evo 850 SSD (2nd OS Drive) + 3TB Seagate + 1TB Seagate, BeQuiet PowerZone 1000W

    RiG2: HTPC AMD A10-7850K APU, 2x8GB Kingstone HyperX 2400C12, AsRock FM2A88M Extreme4+, 128GB SSD + 640GB Samsung 7200, LG Blu-ray Recorder, Thermaltake BACH, Hiper 4M880 880W PSU

    SmartPhone Samsung Galaxy S7 EDGE
    XBONE paired with 55'' Samsung LED 3D TV

  3. #453
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    297
    I asked the guys to install Windows for me. They need to test *all* of the installs, so Windows is taking priority so I can play with it. Hehe. So we'll see soon if it's bugged or working properly. At least if it breaks, we have a contact at Supermicro that should be able to get us a proper BIOS, but that remains to be seen.

    Just finished installing the motherboard into a chassis going to to test it shortly...I'll update as I can.

  4. #454
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Madison, TN
    Posts
    934
    Excellent

  5. #455
    On the rise!
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1,008
    Quote Originally Posted by GenTarkin View Post
    hrm....I dont know if thats good for barcelona then if a cpu clocked 260mhz more wins by almost 3 seconds....wonder what the core 2 would do @ 2.16ghz
    or OVERALL lol wonder what the barcelonay would do @ 2.16ghz how close it would be.
    My lappy w/ 2.33Ghz C2D and 2GB 533. When I get windows back on it I will run 32m and see!
    Last edited by m411b; 09-15-2007 at 01:27 PM.

  6. #456
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Devon
    Posts
    3,437
    Quote Originally Posted by tsuehpsyde View Post
    I asked the guys to install Windows for me. They need to test *all* of the installs, so Windows is taking priority so I can play with it. Hehe. So we'll see soon if it's bugged or working properly. At least if it breaks, we have a contact at Supermicro that should be able to get us a proper BIOS, but that remains to be seen.

    Just finished installing the motherboard into a chassis going to to test it shortly...I'll update as I can.
    Then I have only one dilemma: to go to sleep or not to go ??

    RiG1: Ryzen 7 1700 @4.0GHz 1.39V, Asus X370 Prime, G.Skill RipJaws 2x8GB 3200MHz CL14 Samsung B-die, TuL Vega 56 Stock, Samsung SS805 100GB SLC SDD (OS Drive) + 512GB Evo 850 SSD (2nd OS Drive) + 3TB Seagate + 1TB Seagate, BeQuiet PowerZone 1000W

    RiG2: HTPC AMD A10-7850K APU, 2x8GB Kingstone HyperX 2400C12, AsRock FM2A88M Extreme4+, 128GB SSD + 640GB Samsung 7200, LG Blu-ray Recorder, Thermaltake BACH, Hiper 4M880 880W PSU

    SmartPhone Samsung Galaxy S7 EDGE
    XBONE paired with 55'' Samsung LED 3D TV

  7. #457
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    297
    I'm at work until 9PM so if all goes well, I should be able to do what I want as long as I keep on top of work. Also, the system has booted into a live Linux environment without problem, so that's a good sign. I'll let everyone know how the Windows Server 2003 install goes.

  8. #458
    Phenom™
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    5,163
    Quote Originally Posted by tsuehpsyde View Post
    I'm at work until 9PM so if all goes well, I should be able to do what I want as long as I keep on top of work. Also, the system has booted into a live Linux environment without problem, so that's a good sign. I'll let everyone know how the Windows Server 2003 install goes.
    Till 9PM on a Sat? I feel for you

    BTW, is this is the same board that Anandtech used for their preview?

  9. #459
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    297
    This is the board we're using:
    http://www.supermicro.com/Aplus/moth...55/H8DME-2.cfm

    And Windows is installing now...and yes, until 9PM on a Saturday, and I work until 9PM tomorrow as well. Thanks for the sympathy.

  10. #460
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    746
    Quote Originally Posted by s7e9h3n View Post
    Till 9PM on a Sat? I feel for you

    BTW, is this is the same board that Anandtech used for their preview?
    no. anandtech used a DMU+

    cheers,

    dave
    Heat: 50 - 0 - 0 under "Argus333"

  11. #461
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    297
    After a few cursings and some various BIOS changes....

    http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=243088

    Still trying to figure out why it's unstable, but considering that's not really my department and I have other stuff that needs to be done, I just messed with it until I got it to install properly. Either way, the memory was giving me problems so I ended up clocking it down to DDR2-533 to get it to boot without either rebooting or BSOD'ing. Might be a bad stick of memory in there, but that could take forever to figure out.

    The main thing I'll point out is the HT Link speed. Processor #1 gets 400MHz, and Processor #2 gets 200MHz? Not sure what to make of that.

    Either way, I'll try to get some stuff posted assuming it doesn't flake out on me like it has been.

  12. #462
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    297
    Ugh, this poor system. The memory is just being abused just to get it to run. The timings are auto, which of course are bad, then for some reason it's in single channel mode, at 266MHz, and the HT Link is slow as Hell. Yikes is all I can say. Here's a painfully slow SuperPI 1M for what it's worth. Gotta get back to work.



    Ninja Edit: The first bank of memory (first four sticks) are the only ones showing up. The other 4 sticks in the bank next to CPU #2 aren't showing up at all, so it's only seeing 8GB of memory (but this is 32-bit Windows, so it doesn't really matter). However, the memory is still showing up in slots 1/2/3/4, so I'm not sure why dual channel isn't kicking in...
    Last edited by tsuehpsyde; 09-15-2007 at 04:06 PM.

  13. #463
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    1,321
    holy crap, everybody who tests seems to have these problems. for a platform just released, this is ridiculous... not trying to beat a dead horse, but conroe worked flawlessly months before release. I mean jeez, when did amd send these poor mobo manufacturers the damn samples?
    Core i7 920 3849B028 4.2ghz cooled by ek hf | 6gb stt ddr3 2100 | MSI HD6950 cf cooled by ek fc | Evga x58 e760 Classified | 120gb G.Skill Phoenix Pro | Modded Rocketfish case + 1200w toughpower | mcp 655 pump + mcr 320 + black ice pro II

  14. #464
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    297
    We have a set of 2218s here I could drop in to see how they were working on the same motherboard to see if indeed the processors are to blame, but again, I simply can't do that tonight. Maybe tomorrow depending on circumstances, but I don't want to shoot Barcelona in the head when it could be bad memory causing problems (although the HT speed is a bit strange).

  15. #465
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    118
    ahn... all those problems AND 43 seconds?

    For me it's a good start. Since it can only get faster from there.

  16. #466
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    118
    cky: YES, conroe and kentsfield did worked.

    NOT clovertown and their "likes". The prove is one the time necessarya for intel to begin to ger market share from amd in the server side.

    moreover, I do think that Dave and S7 have enough links to prove that it's true.

    What bothers me is: since the chipstes from server parts are more difficult to deal with is already a fact, why the heck are they so more difficult to deal with? What are the reasons behind it?

  17. #467
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    297
    Last bench for the night. Just used the default settings of 800x600 8bit.



    Let me know what else you want to see and I'll do it. The video is onboard, so 3D benchmarks at this point are worthless so don't even ask.

  18. #468
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    746
    see attached.

    Superpi run @ 42.219 seconds.

    i'm not very trusting of CPU-Z right now, but whatever.

    dave
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	superpi_cpuz.JPG 
Views:	514 
Size:	188.3 KB 
ID:	64450  
    Heat: 50 - 0 - 0 under "Argus333"

  19. #469
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    746
    cinebench R10 scores.

    notice....same time to render as tsue but....less points...yippee.

    cheers,

    dave
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	cinebenchr10_daveg.JPG 
Views:	509 
Size:	118.2 KB 
ID:	64451  
    Heat: 50 - 0 - 0 under "Argus333"

  20. #470
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    297
    Dave, what's the memory at on that SuperPI run?

  21. #471
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    746
    Quote Originally Posted by cky2k6 View Post
    holy crap, everybody who tests seems to have these problems. for a platform just released, this is ridiculous... not trying to beat a dead horse, but conroe worked flawlessly months before release. I mean jeez, when did amd send these poor mobo manufacturers the damn samples?
    a long time ago....there's no excuse for how poorly Tyan, et. al have handled this.

    dave
    Heat: 50 - 0 - 0 under "Argus333"

  22. #472
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Brasil
    Posts
    534
    So that is it? 43s...
    Disappointing, other non optimized programs will run slow too.

  23. #473
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    746
    Quote Originally Posted by doompc View Post
    So that is it? 43s...
    Disappointing, other non optimized programs will run slow too.
    again, deriving system performance on a notably weak benchmark is...well, foolish.

    in any case, here are some CrystalMark results.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	crystalmark_alu.JPG 
Views:	490 
Size:	61.0 KB 
ID:	64452   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	crystalmark_fpu.JPG 
Views:	492 
Size:	75.7 KB 
ID:	64453   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	crystalmark_mem.JPG 
Views:	490 
Size:	77.3 KB 
ID:	64454  
    Heat: 50 - 0 - 0 under "Argus333"

  24. #474
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Chile
    Posts
    4,151
    Nice to se more benchs arriving

    What does Tyan or AMD say about the issues/performance?

  25. #475
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    297
    Still wondering about that memory, Dave. And holy huge images, batman!

    And I'm using a Supermicro, but I think Dave is on a Tyan...and our performance seems about similar except SuperPI, but considering the memory issues I'm dealing with that's not surprising.

Page 19 of 46 FirstFirst ... 91617181920212229 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •