Here's a little teaser....

[informal]

Oh yeah, forgot to add that there seems to be a problem with the memory detection as well. For some reason or another the 4x2gb sticks of PC5300 are running @ 159mhz SINGLE CHANNEL CL5. That's have a HUGE impact on performance. If anybody's curious, @ 800Mhz on the cpu and 159mhz on the mem, I can run a 39sec Spi 1m LOL

Thanks for the pictures and latest info
Can you verify again the Spi 1M run on those 800Mhz and 159Mhz for ram ?Since it is a LOT faster than kyosen's run on Akiba demo yesterday-49s@2Ghz (btw,thanks kyosen for those results ).I mean,is there a possibility that even if the reported speed is 800mhz,the CPU is actually running @2Ghz(and scoring the 39s)?Best way is to run Spi in dually config and bind it to CPU1(instead of CPU0) in process explorer.
Thanks in advance and good luck with the system

[massman]

I mean,is there a possibility that even if the reported speed is 800mhz,the CPU is actually running @2Ghz(and scoring the 39s)?Best way is to run Spi in dually config and bind it to CPU1(instead of CPU0) in process explorer.
Thanks in advance and good luck with the system

Yeap, that would be my guess too. Coolaler has a 39s 1M run at 2G

[dave_graham]

CPU1 won't run any faster than 800mhz. CPU2 runs @ the proper 2ghz, but on a dually board, you can't only run CPU2. If you're running a single proc, you can only use the CPU1 socket.

L1N64 Bios is going just as expected with Asus - absolutely nowhere....

you suprised yet?

So not even single CPU benches for us?

What is progress with L1N64 BIOS support for K10?

Anyway great job both s7e9h3n & Dave!

we're trying. I can run superpi tonite. i do actually need a download list for me to run.

Oh yeah, forgot to add that there seems to be a problem with the memory detection as well. For some reason or another the 4x2gb sticks of PC5300 are running @ 159mhz SINGLE CHANNEL CL5. That's have a HUGE impact on performance. If anybody's curious, @ 800Mhz on the cpu and 159mhz on the mem, I can run a 39sec Spi 1m LOL

dear god...that BIOS (which looks like it's for an nVidia based board as my 3992 uses an Award bios) looks.....interesting....

in any case, i can see what i get tonite.

Thanks for the pictures and latest info
Can you verify again the Spi 1M run on those 800Mhz and 159Mhz for ram ?Since it is a LOT faster than kyosen's run on Akiba demo yesterday-49s@2Ghz (btw,thanks kyosen for those results ).I mean,is there a possibility that even if the reported speed is 800mhz,the CPU is actually running @2Ghz(and scoring the 39s)?Best way is to run Spi in dually config and bind it to CPU1(instead of CPU0) in process explorer.
Thanks in advance and good luck with the system

thanks for the tips.

dave

[Lightman]

Dave for me please:
- Cinebench 9.5 x64 Cinebench
- 3DMark06 CPU Test
- Everest4.0 Latency tests and FPU tests Everset Trial
- mBench memory subsystem benchmark mBench.exe
- anything else you will like (including server benchmarks, kernel compilation, etc...)


THANKS!

[massman]

Dave for me please:
- Cinebench 9.5 x64 Cinebench
- 3DMark06 CPU Test
- Everest4.0 Latency tests and FPU tests Everset Trial
- mBench memory subsystem benchmark mBench.exe
- anything else you will like (including server benchmarks, kernel compilation, etc...)


THANKS!

Maybe 3DMark01?

[s7e9h3n]

Maybe 3DMark01?

Does 3dMark even install on x64 based OS's? I've tried to install PCMark on my 2x2218's running 2k3 x64 and it won't work. The only way I can run PCMark is to use a separate XP 32-bit install.

[hawkeyefan]

Does 3dMark even install on x64 based OS's? I've tried to install PCMark on my 2x2218's running 2k3 x64 and it won't work. The only way I can run PCMark is to use a separate XP 32-bit install.

Have you tried running the installer in XP SP2 Compatibility Mode? Might have to do the same with the .exe once it's installed.

maybe I'll give this a try myself, haven't run that in years

[Lightman]

Does 3dMark even install on x64 based OS's? I've tried to install PCMark on my 2x2218's running 2k3 x64 and it won't work. The only way I can run PCMark is to use a separate XP 32-bit install.

It's running very well under XP x64 in contrary to stupid PCMark...

[s7e9h3n]

It's running very well under XP x64 in contrary to stupid PCMark...

Ahhh, ok....good to know as I should be getting an 8800ultra (or two) early next week.

OT: Noticed you have a T-mobile MDA in your sig. I've got the MDA pro and when I get bored of messing with computers, I just OC my phone :p.

[gOtVoltage]

Does 3dMark even install on x64 based OS's? I've tried to install PCMark on my 2x2218's running 2k3 x64 and it won't work. The only way I can run PCMark is to use a separate XP 32-bit install.

It works



P.S. Nice results every one ,Iwill be hoping AMD pulls through because i really want a 4core Proc that isnt INTEL!

[s7e9h3n]

Thanks for the pictures and latest info
Can you verify again the Spi 1M run on those 800Mhz and 159Mhz for ram ?Since it is a LOT faster than kyosen's run on Akiba demo yesterday-49s@2Ghz (btw,thanks kyosen for those results ).I mean,is there a possibility that even if the reported speed is 800mhz,the CPU is actually running @2Ghz(and scoring the 39s)?Best way is to run Spi in dually config and bind it to CPU1(instead of CPU0) in process explorer.
Thanks in advance and good luck with the system

Oops....I was assuming one of the logical procs in socket #1 was running the bench, when in reality the process initiates with cpu1 and then is immediately handed off to cpu6 for some odd reason. Bound the bench to Cpu5 and it results in a 1m ranging from 39s - 41s. The memory is STILL being detected @ 159mhz single channel though. I tried to install Sandra to check other stats on the board, but it flat out wouldn't even run after installation. Upon reboot, I can't even get back into the OS. The rig still posts, but just doesn't enter the OS. When I try to re-install windows, I get a BSOD in the middle of the setup process. I'm tired and frustrated with screwing around with this config which AMD had claimed should work without a problem. I'm going to have this setup swapped out for another which I should have in a couple of days.......

[Motiv]

Oops....I was assuming one of the logical procs in socket #1 was running the bench, when in reality the process initiates with cpu1 and then is immediately handed off to cpu6 for some odd reason. Bound the bench to Cpu5 and it results in a 1m ranging from 39s - 41s. The memory is STILL being detected @ 159mhz single channel though. I tried to install Sandra to check other stats on the board, but it flat out wouldn't even run after installation. Upon reboot, I can't even get back into the OS. The rig still posts, but just doesn't enter the OS. When I try to re-install windows, I get a BSOD in the middle of the setup process. I'm tired and frustrated with screwing around with this config which AMD had claimed should work without a problem. I'm going to have this setup swapped out for another which I should have in a couple of days.......

Such a shame s7e9h3n. Was really looking forward to some benchies. Looks like I'll have to wait till you get another rig next week. Lets hope it is a bit better