Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 76 to 86 of 86

Thread: IBM published Barcelona SpecCPU results.

  1. #76
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    1,125
    Quote Originally Posted by dave_graham View Post
    some manufacturers have been known to toss results into the ring early...won't name names, but...this is an OEM pissing match, remember.

    dave
    Have you ever known a Tier 1 OEM to submit pre-production scores to SPEC???

    They have to say when the hardware will be available to customers... and pre-prod never would be.

  2. #77
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    215
    IBM submitted scores from a defective CPU!
    I just can't believe it.
    = P5WDH - E6600 - Tuniq Tower - 2GB STT PC6400 - 8800GT - Real Power Pro 850 =

  3. #78
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    746
    Quote Originally Posted by terrace215 View Post
    Have you ever known a Tier 1 OEM to submit pre-production scores to SPEC???

    They have to say when the hardware will be available to customers... and pre-prod never would be.
    *cough* it happens. i've known several companies to publish "machines" that suddenly have config changes (significant) at time of release.

    cheers,

    dave
    Heat: 50 - 0 - 0 under "Argus333"

  4. #79
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    746
    Quote Originally Posted by lapdog View Post
    IBM submitted scores from a defective CPU!
    I just can't believe it.
    didn't say that...was just questioning results.

    dave
    Heat: 50 - 0 - 0 under "Argus333"

  5. #80
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    215
    Quote Originally Posted by dave_graham View Post
    guys, again, there are significant performance deltas between the release stepping of the core and the B0/B1 steppings.

    without much more information than that, you just need to keep your panties in check.

    dave
    I guess I misunderstood; you certainly seem to suggest IBM used B0/B1 that had problems and have been fixed (were defective.)
    Last edited by lapdog; 09-09-2007 at 07:58 PM.
    = P5WDH - E6600 - Tuniq Tower - 2GB STT PC6400 - 8800GT - Real Power Pro 850 =

  6. #81
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    746
    Quote Originally Posted by lapdog View Post
    I guess I misunderstood; you certainly seem to suggest IBM used B0/B1 that had problems and have been fixed (were defective.)
    IF the identified CPUs were B1s, yes. don't know as that's not typically revealed.

    dave
    Heat: 50 - 0 - 0 under "Argus333"

  7. #82
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,366
    [QUOTE=hollo;2421465]LS-DYNA, being a simulation program, will naturally be floating point heavy, like most simulations (eg molecular dynamics on supercomputers).
    [QUOTE]

    LS-DYNA is a heavy bandwidth benchmark and quad cores not the best solutions for this benchmark.
    Here is the list of 8-core scores:
    http://www.topcrunch.org/benchmark_r...count=8&type=5
    Last edited by kl0012; 09-09-2007 at 08:10 PM.

  8. #83
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    169
    Which is more important in stanford's folding@home?
    SPECint/SPECfp????

    -tam2-

  9. #84
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    510
    Quote Originally Posted by tam2 View Post
    Which is more important in stanford's folding@home?
    SPECint/SPECfp????
    Neither really give you a good hint:

    http://www.techreport.com/articles.x/13176/7

  10. #85
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    215
    Quote Originally Posted by dave_graham View Post
    IF the identified CPUs were B1s, yes. don't know as that's not typically revealed.

    dave
    You have lost all credibility in my book.
    = P5WDH - E6600 - Tuniq Tower - 2GB STT PC6400 - 8800GT - Real Power Pro 850 =

  11. #86
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    T.O.
    Posts
    528
    Quote Originally Posted by lapdog View Post
    You have lost all credibility in my book.
    You seem to give and take said credibility quite easily

    Dave's input, whether here or on 2cpu or any other forum, is valued. People may disagree with it, hold it highly, or merely lump it in with other voices, but he's one of the people giving actual input (ie. not regurgitating FUD's tabloid articles). That, in itself, gives him "cred" in my book.

    Personally, I'm waiting at least a month or two after the release to form an opinion. Launch day presents too small a sample most likely tainted by brown-nosing. The industry itself will let us know whether they're a good product or not.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •