K10 Scores starting to surface

[zaarath]

Again from coolaler's site

http://forum.coolaler.com/showthread.php?t=161127




The setup is Dual Opteron 2332 @ 2G with total 8 cores.

From what I can gather from dual clovertown scores



1X: Clovertown 22% advantage clock for clock
8X: K10 speedup 7X, Clovertown speedup 6X

So even K10 scales better, it still may lose at dual socket, at least for Cinebench 10.

Don't shoot me down, I'm just a messanger.

[xlink]

we still need to know how well it scales.

I want 3.3Ghz on water

[msimax]

ooooh baby cant wait

[guess2098]

how about /2 still 4000 extra then 4.7G QX6700... hehe

[kl0012]

For comparision:
http://www.3dfluff.com/mash/cinebench/top.php
Core 2 Duo 2GHz = 2016

[zaarath]

For comparision:
http://www.3dfluff.com/mash/cinebench/top.php
Core 2 Duo 2GHz = 2016

You have to realize the 2016 score is run under windows XP 32bit
The score is higher under 64bit

[zanzabar]

has the core htt clock been released yet im curios on weather amd has upped it from 200mhz

[Movieman]

I got to go look that up. I think I ran cine10 at 2000mhz for one of the guys..might have been 9.5..

[accord99]

Xbitlabs has a Fritz score for an 8-core X5365 system:

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu...tel-v8_13.html

[tictac]

Xbitlabs has a Fritz score for an 8-core X5365 system:

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu...tel-v8_13.html

[kl0012]

Xbitlabs has a Fritz score for an 8-core X5365 system:

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu...tel-v8_13.html

Xeon faster by 60%. Clock difference is only 50%.

[savantu]

This is consistent with previous information; K10 is slower clock/clock than Core in rendering ( I expect similar results in Povray).No magic dust inside...

A 3.33Ghz Yorkfiled scores 13068 , almost the same as 8 2Ghz K10 cores.

[Movieman]

Running it now at 2013mhz(closest I can get to 2000) on 32 bit win2K3.
Will take a bit..Machine isn't used to running under 3000mhz

[zaarath]

Running it now at 2013mhz(closest I can get to 2000) on 32 bit win2K3.
Will take a bit..Machine isn't used to running under 3000mhz

Can you please run it under 64bit windows?

Core 2 has 15% advantage in 64bit against 32bit

[n91htmare]

Can you please run it under 64bit windows?

Core 2 has 15% advantage in 64bit against 32bit

well if the score is higher or same in 32bit then just assume that it's 15% faster in 64bit.

Wouldn't wanna make AMD look THAT bad in cinebench

[Slay0r]

Better speed up in cinebench when compared to core 2, but that's no news is it .

Would help to know what kinda rams speeds were used for the tests, also i'd love to take a peak at pi calculations even though I have a feeling they will be real bad .

Awaiting your results MM I'm very curious .

[kemo]

So is that quad or 2X quad



same score of a 4GHZ quad Qx

[zaarath]

wPrime score
Edit: Kemo6600 beat me to it.

Can someone post a dual clover wprime score?

[savantu]

2x quad ; fairly obvious when you see processor #8

[Movieman]

Can you please run it under 64bit windows?

Core 2 has 15% advantage in 64bit against 32bit

I can, thats the other machine, that runs on win2K3 Ent 64 bit.
I've already run cine10 at 3000 and at 3240 on that machine and posted in the first cimebench10 thread here..9% slower than Intels posted benchmarks at the same cpu speed..
At my max of 3240 I was app 400 points behind the penryn setup at 3000

[kemo]

So simply you are saying that Intel dual socket is faster and indeed it looks faster in wprime

[Slay0r]

So simply you are saying that Intel dual socket is faster and indeed it looks faster in wprime

The multi core efficiency sees amd as the winner . That said, the performance seems still higher on Intel's side clock per clock .

we still don't know how k10 clocks/scales though...

[Movieman]

2013mhz..win2K3 32 bit:

[kl0012]

[nn_step]

2013mhz..win2K3 32 bit:
[IMG][/IMG]

now to make sure that the OS isn't effecting it, 64bit may be required.