MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 585

Thread: AMD's 3GHz K10 to break 30,000 3DMark06 (Inq)

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    Posts
    3,858
    Quote Originally Posted by doompc View Post
    K10 has Full Async IMC, (...)
    Link?
    If this were true...
    You were not supposed to see this.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Brasil
    Posts
    534
    Quote Originally Posted by largon View Post
    Link?
    If this were true...
    I went to the Barcelona presentation and asked directly to the presenter about this. He confirmed the integer divider limitations were solved.

    I'm prety sure we'll have 1MHz step memory clock adjustment all the way up to about 750MHz (DDR2-1400).

    Also, the IMC received a deep upgrade (larger write bufer, dual channel is now two independent 64bit channels, DDR2-1066 official support, the data path to the northbridge was extended to 128 bits, and so on).

    30k still seems unreal, but I think it will be at least 10% faster per clock than Penryn in general application, and way more in highly multithreaded workloads.

  3. #3
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by doompc View Post
    I went to the Barcelona presentation and asked directly to the presenter about this. He confirmed the integer divider limitations were solved.
    Means absolutely nothing. Most of us don't believe anything Intel or AMD says without proof.

    I'm prety sure we'll have 1MHz step memory clock adjustment all the way up to about 750MHz (DDR2-1400).

    Also, the IMC received a deep upgrade (larger write bufer, dual channel is now two independent 64bit channels, DDR2-1066 official support, the data path to the northbridge was extended to 128 bits, and so on).

    30k still seems unreal, but I think it will be at least 10% faster per clock than Penryn in general application, and way more in highly multithreaded workloads.
    3DMarks has always proven its uselessness for anything other than like platform stability testing and etc..... Since it doesn't correlate to any real-world game/s, trying to use it as a standard is misleading to say the least. Please note, I said the same thing when P4 was winning*.

    How much faster is K10? I don't think there will be a single Performance number advantage. Some apps it might be 25% faster, other apps might show it as being 20% slower.
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman
    With the two approaches to "how" to design a processor WE are the lucky ones as we get to choose what is important to us as individuals.
    For that we should thank BOTH (AMD and Intel) companies!


    Posted by duploxxx
    I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
    Posted by gallag
    there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
    qft!

  4. #4
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Maine, USA
    Posts
    1,029
    Hmmm...

    K10 x RD790 x X2900XT CF x engineered and optimizated from the ground up within one Co. that has a proven track record for innovation = 30K 3DMark06? It's not impossible!

    Hey... get away from my dream... it's all mine... *walks away laughing sinisterly*

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    415
    Quote Originally Posted by xenolith View Post
    Hmmm...

    K10 x RD790 x X2900XT CF x engineered and optimizated from the ground up within one Co. that has a proven track record for innovation = 30K 3DMark06? It's not impossible!

    Hey... get away from my dream... it's all mine... *walks away laughing sinisterly*
    2900 has almost literally NOTHING to do with AMD. Its design stems from former ATI and was done well before the merge.

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    415
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman View Post
    And you just bought yourself a 3 day vacation for your nasty mouth.
    Enjoy!
    Quote Originally Posted by CraptacularOne View Post
    I'm actually now more interested in their implementation of more than 2 GPUs in Crossfire. Since Nvidia's Quad SLI was a bust. Maybe they have figured out a better way to distribute the load between the GPUs than Nvidia did.
    Wow, these XtremeDays go fast.

  7. #7
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,005
    Quote Originally Posted by T2k View Post
    Wow, these XtremeDays go fast.
    Please move on, there was a simple misunderstanding is all.
    Core i7 3770K
    EVGA GTX780 + Surround
    EVGA GTX670
    EVGA Z77 FTW
    8GB (2x4GB) G.Skill 1600Mhz DDR3
    Ultra X3 1000w PSU PSU
    Windows 7 Pro 64bit
    Thermaltake Xaser VI

  8. #8
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Maine, USA
    Posts
    1,029
    Quote Originally Posted by T2k View Post
    2900 has almost literally NOTHING to do with AMD. Its design stems from former ATI and was done well before the merge.
    Designs go through several iterations before production. Still, point taken.

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    BEYOND THE SUN - SCOTLAND
    Posts
    476
    I'm just happy that AMD are finally gonna release K10 very soon. My benchmarks are beginning to look like some from my AXP days....

    Can't wait to get my hands on one

    Intel's CSI sounds interesting......and regardless of mistakes made in the past...Intel don't seem to make many blunders these days.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •