Results 1 to 25 of 585

Thread: AMD's 3GHz K10 to break 30,000 3DMark06 (Inq)

Hybrid View

  1. 08-28-2007, 10:05 AM #1
    Zytek_Fan
    Zytek_Fan is offline
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    3,200
    Quote Originally Posted by kemo6600 View Post
    one word "impossible"
    How about highly improbable, but it is possible.
    "To exist in this vast universe for a speck of time is the great gift of life. Our tiny sliver of time is our gift of life. It is our only life. The universe will go on, indifferent to our brief existence, but while we are here we touch not just part of that vastness, but also the lives around us. Life is the gift each of us has been given. Each life is our own and no one else's. It is precious beyond all counting. It is the greatest value we have. Cherish it for what it truly is."
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 08-28-2007, 10:08 AM #2
    kemo
    kemo is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Cairo
    Posts
    2,366
    Send a message via MSN to kemo Send a message via Skype™ to kemo
    Quote Originally Posted by Zytek_Fan View Post
    How about highly improbable, but it is possible.
    No way that a dual 2900XT @ 830/900will break 30,000 even in the next 5 years


    2.5GHz = 23.768 and 3GHZ = 30,000 ,,,,,,,,,, wake up
    Intel Core I7 920 @ 3.8GHZ 1.28V (Core Contact Freezer)
    Asus X58 P6T
    6GB OCZ Gold DDR3-1600MHZ 8-8-8-24
    XFX HD5870
    WD 1TB Black HD
    Corsair 850TX
    Cooler Master HAF 922
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 08-28-2007, 10:14 AM #3
    RPGWiZaRD
    RPGWiZaRD is offline
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    4,308
    Send a message via MSN to RPGWiZaRD
    Quote Originally Posted by kemo6600 View Post
    2.5GHz = 23.768 and 3GHZ = 30,000 ,,,,,,,,,, wake up
    My first thoughts too. Cuz of that I see this article as BS. If it was 1.8GHz and 3GHz then maybe but such big increase for 500MHz CPU clock speed bump, NAAAAHH.

    EDIT: nvm seems like 23k was with 2900XT at default. OK then it's somewhat plausible.
    Last edited by RPGWiZaRD; 08-28-2007 at 10:17 AM.
    Intel? Core i5-4670K @ 4.3 GHz | ASRock Extreme6 Z87 | G.Skill Sniper 2x8GB @ DDR4-1866 CL9 | Gigabyte GTX 970 OC Windforce 3x | Super Flower Titanium 1000W | ViewSonic VX2268wm 120Hz LCD | Phanteks PH-TC14PE | Logitech MX-518 | Win 7 x64 Professional | Samsung 850 EVO & 840 Pro SSDs

    If all people would share opinions in an objective manner, the world would be a friendlier place
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 08-28-2007, 10:50 AM #4
    xlink
    xlink is offline
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    HD0
    Posts
    2,646
    Quote Originally Posted by kemo6600 View Post
    No way that a dual 2900XT @ 830/900will break 30,000 even in the next 5 years


    2.5GHz = 23.768 and 3GHZ = 30,000 ,,,,,,,,,, wake up
    the memory might be running @ settings pre OC...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules