Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 90

Thread: Post your CineBench 10 Benchmarks

  1. #1
    Xtreme Mentor dengyong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    A great place again
    Posts
    2,589

    Post your CineBench 10 Benchmarks

    I saw this benchmark in the news section http://www.maxon.net/pages/download/cinebench_d.html Some of us posted there but it should be here.
    My vid card was at 765/1127 on this run.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	3.4.765.1127.JPG 
Views:	2951 
Size:	140.7 KB 
ID:	63283

  2. #2
    Xtreme Mentor dengyong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    A great place again
    Posts
    2,589
    Looks like no one wants to run cinebench. Xtreme?

  3. #3
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    On top of a mountain
    Posts
    4,163
    Quote Originally Posted by dengyong View Post
    Looks like no one wants to run cinebench. Xtreme?
    Give me a second to stop Folding and I will post one up
    20 Logs on the fire for WCG: i7 920@2.8 X3220@3.0 X3220@2.4 E8400@4.05 E6600@2.4

  4. #4
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    On top of a mountain
    Posts
    4,163
    Hmmm it won't run. Not sure what the issue is. I am running XP Pro SP2 2bit.
    20 Logs on the fire for WCG: i7 920@2.8 X3220@3.0 X3220@2.4 E8400@4.05 E6600@2.4

  5. #5
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    U.S.A.
    Posts
    4,743
    32bit xp vs x64 vista cpu is a qx6700 @ 3.608Ghz
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	CINEBENCH_10_qx6700_3.6Ghz_32bitxp.jpg 
Views:	2890 
Size:	191.1 KB 
ID:	63345   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	CINEBENCH_10_qx6700_3.6Ghz.jpg 
Views:	2866 
Size:	194.7 KB 
ID:	63346  


    Asus Z9PE-D8 WS with 64GB of registered ECC ram.|Dell 30" LCD 3008wfp:7970 video card

    LSI series raid controller
    SSDs: Crucial C300 256GB
    Standard drives: Seagate ST32000641AS & WD 1TB black
    OSes: Linux and Windows x64

  6. #6
    Xtreme Mentor dengyong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    A great place again
    Posts
    2,589
    64 bit os really makes a difference.

  7. #7
    -100C Club Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Somewhere off topic
    Posts
    513
    Just had a little play, will do more of an overclock later as this system is limited by the psu
    Spec in sig.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	cine1.jpg 
Views:	2777 
Size:	132.8 KB 
ID:	63373  
    Quote Originally Posted by jimmyz View Post
    sorry to hear about the dead cards, but.. If stuff ain't dieing, you aren't trying.

    נְפִילִים

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Curitiba - Brazil
    Posts
    89
    EDIT... oops ... will try
    Last edited by periquitos; 08-24-2007 at 04:48 AM.
    G0 Q6600 | GIGABYTE DS3R | 2GB SAMSUNG 800 | 7600GS | BENQ 1640 | VANTEC STEALTH 470w PSU

  9. #9
    -100C Club Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Somewhere off topic
    Posts
    513
    Had another stab at it, not greatly improved
    Need a better mobo and need to add more volts to my memory and cpus
    It's a start I suppose...
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	cine2.jpg 
Views:	37680 
Size:	197.4 KB 
ID:	63418  
    Quote Originally Posted by jimmyz View Post
    sorry to hear about the dead cards, but.. If stuff ain't dieing, you aren't trying.

    נְפִילִים

  10. #10
    Memory Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    11,651
    System:
    • Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 L725A903 7/31/07 pack date G0
    • CPU cooling = Swiftech G4 Storm/Thermochill 120.3/MCP655
    • NB chipset cooling = Radiical Chipset Block/Corsair Cool single 120mm fan Rad/MCP350
    • Asus Blitz Extreme 0804 bios
    • 128MB Gainward FX5200 PCI
    • 2x1GB OCZ PC3-14400 Platinum - DDR3-1800 rated at 8-8-8-27 at 1.9v
    • 500GB Seagate 7200.10 SATA on SATA1 Port
    • LiteOn 165H DVD Burner
    • Sony FDD
    • 1KW OCZ ProXStream
    • WinXP Pro SP2


    Cinebench R10
    ---

  11. #11
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    1,196
    Old PC now brother in law's.


    My PC


    PC In Smoking Section AKA Garage


    I didn't run my HTPC, laptop or other computer around the house.
    Last edited by Major_A; 08-24-2007 at 12:05 PM.

  12. #12
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Cruz Alta - CBA - Argentina
    Posts
    617
    Stock @TR Ultra 120 eXtreme + SilverStone FM-121 @ AS5 @ 20ºC Ambiente
    VGA Stock 743-1656
    iMac 24''
    BNDMOD @
    Cruz Alta (Cba.) Argentina

  13. #13
    Xtreme Mentor dengyong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    A great place again
    Posts
    2,589
    Quote Originally Posted by BND|MOD View Post
    Stock @TR Ultra 120 eXtreme + SilverStone FM-121 @ AS5 @ 20ºC Ambiente
    VGA Stock 743-1656
    4.0ghz is great for a B3, could you run this benchmark at that speed?

  14. #14
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Cruz Alta - CBA - Argentina
    Posts
    617
    Quote Originally Posted by dengyong View Post
    4.0ghz is great for a B3, could you run this benchmark at that speed?
    this weekend i'll try. but i don't believe that be possible as soon as i mount a watercooling system
    iMac 24''
    BNDMOD @
    Cruz Alta (Cba.) Argentina

  15. #15
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Aarhus, Denmark
    Posts
    314
    The OpenGL benchmark in CineBench10 behaves very odd. If I run it twice in a row I get different results. Starting with 62xx and then a 42xx score. If I run another OpenGL app/benchmark or simply just opens the nVidia control panel and then run cinebench10 the OpenGL score is in the 42xx range. cinebench9.5 nor any other benchmark I have run, behave in this way it's only cinebench10. The only way for me to get a 62xx score is to re-boot and then run cinebench10 before running any other graphics app. Closing and re-opening cinebench10 doesn't help either it still scores 42xx. I have tried different drivers but with the same result. Unigine's sancturary demo (http://unigine.com) gives consistent results in it's OpenGL benchmak so I have no idea what's going on with cinebench10.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	cine10bench.jpg 
Views:	2597 
Size:	198.4 KB 
ID:	63464  
    AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
    ASRock Radeon RX 7900 XTX Phantom Gaming OC
    Asus ROG Strix B550-F Gaming Motherboard
    Corsair RM1000x SHIFT PSU
    32 GB DDR4 @3800 MHz CL16 (4 x 8 GB)

    1x WD Black SN850 1 TB
    1 x Samsung 960 250 GB
    2 x Samsung 860 1 TB
    1x Segate 16 TB HDD

    Dell G3223Q 4K UHD Monitor
    Running Windows 11 Pro x64 Version 23H2 build 22631.2506

    Smartphone : Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra

  16. #16
    Xtreme Mentor dengyong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    A great place again
    Posts
    2,589
    Quote Originally Posted by Toysoldier View Post
    The OpenGL benchmark in CineBench10 behaves very odd. If I run it twice in a row I get different results. Starting with 62xx and then a 42xx score. If I run another OpenGL app/benchmark or simply just opens the nVidia control panel and then run cinebench10 the OpenGL score is in the 42xx range. cinebench9.5 nor any other benchmark I have run, behave in this way it's only cinebench10. The only way for me to get a 62xx score is to re-boot and then run cinebench10 before running any other graphics app. Closing and re-opening cinebench10 doesn't help either it still scores 42xx. I have tried different drivers but with the same result. Unigine's sancturary demo (http://unigine.com) gives consistent results in it's OpenGL benchmak so I have no idea what's going on with cinebench10.

    Try running the OpenGL test once, then run all.

  17. #17
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Aarhus, Denmark
    Posts
    314
    Quote Originally Posted by dengyong View Post
    Try running the OpenGL test once, then run all.
    Thank you It now scores 6824 in the OpenGL test.

    I also tried running the OpenGL test 4 times in a row and it scored as follows
    4626 ~ 6264 ~ 6814 and finally 6823.

    Do you know the reason for this behavior ?
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	cine10bench_1.jpg 
Views:	2594 
Size:	199.2 KB 
ID:	63466  
    AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
    ASRock Radeon RX 7900 XTX Phantom Gaming OC
    Asus ROG Strix B550-F Gaming Motherboard
    Corsair RM1000x SHIFT PSU
    32 GB DDR4 @3800 MHz CL16 (4 x 8 GB)

    1x WD Black SN850 1 TB
    1 x Samsung 960 250 GB
    2 x Samsung 860 1 TB
    1x Segate 16 TB HDD

    Dell G3223Q 4K UHD Monitor
    Running Windows 11 Pro x64 Version 23H2 build 22631.2506

    Smartphone : Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra

  18. #18
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    On top of a mountain
    Posts
    4,163
    Aaargh still cannot get it to run...
    20 Logs on the fire for WCG: i7 920@2.8 X3220@3.0 X3220@2.4 E8400@4.05 E6600@2.4

  19. #19
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    France
    Posts
    576
    watercooling @ 25°C

    French Overclockers roxxxxxx
    OCM Team addict

  20. #20
    Xtreme Mentor dengyong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    A great place again
    Posts
    2,589
    Quote Originally Posted by Toysoldier View Post
    Thank you It now scores 6824 in the OpenGL test.

    I also tried running the OpenGL test 4 times in a row and it scored as follows
    4626 ~ 6264 ~ 6814 and finally 6823.

    Do you know the reason for this behavior ?

    No I just noticed that it works.

  21. #21
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    204,166
    Dual Clovertowns (X5340) @ 3092MHz
    Server 2003 x64


  22. #22
    Xtreme Mentor dengyong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    A great place again
    Posts
    2,589
    Quote Originally Posted by sierra_bound View Post
    Dual Clovertowns (X5340) @ 3092MHz
    Server 2003 x64


    Could you run the single test as well as the multi so we can see the multi proc speed up. Good score.

  23. #23
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    204,166
    Single and multi-processor tests at 3157MHz


  24. #24
    V3 Xeons coming soon!
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    36,363
    Quote Originally Posted by sierra_bound View Post
    Single and multi-processor tests at 3157MHz

    22,564
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...1&postcount=12
    Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
    The XS WCG team needs your support.
    A good project with good goals.
    Come join us,get that warm fuzzy feeling that you've done something good for mankind.

    Quote Originally Posted by Frisch View Post
    If you have lost faith in humanity, then hold a newborn in your hands.

  25. #25
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    204,166
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman View Post
    I haven't pushed the system yet.

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •