new core temp 0.95.4 beta

**KALISPIMENTA** · 08-22-2007, 09:12 AM

http://www.thecoolest.zerobrains.com/CoreTemp/

**RPGWiZaRD** · 08-22-2007, 09:22 AM

Seems like finally rev G0 CPUs are supported.

Shows +15C now and that makes my full load 69C oh well it knew it from before anyways. Doesn't 69C full load sound a bit much for a caseless setup with 1.52v idle and 1.5v load though with a Tuniq? Room temp is a mighty ~28C at the moment though.

**giorgos th.** · 08-22-2007, 09:34 AM

34C idle - 56C load with 26-27C room temp...
i think we got used to wrong (low) readings and now all the temps are gonna seem pretty high.......

**Vapor** · 08-22-2007, 09:36 AM

Originally Posted by RPGWiZaRD

Seems like finally rev G0 CPUs are supported.

Shows +15C now and that makes my full load 69C oh well it knew it from before anyways. Doesn't 69C full load sound a bit much for a caseless setup with 1.52v idle and 1.5v load though with a Tuniq?

Sounds about right for a dual core...few degrees cooler than B2.

**RPGWiZaRD** · 08-22-2007, 09:39 AM

Oh well I guess the 28C room temp and that I've pushed it a bit hard as temps went up a lot from 3.6GHz to 3.75GHz and a big vcore increase was required and I mainly run Tuniq 1600~1700rpm, so that probably explains it.

EDIT: I Like that new avatar Vapor.

**LexDiamonds** · 08-22-2007, 10:02 AM

Can anyone report on the vista friendliness of this version?

**Spawne32** · 08-22-2007, 10:52 AM

So wait a minute, which one is more accurate??? Does this mean im going to have to redo all my readings for the heatsink roundup with the new core temp version?

**halo112358** · 08-22-2007, 10:54 AM

Does this version fix the random reboots with A64 machines?

**largon** · 08-22-2007, 10:54 AM

Originally Posted by LexDiamonds

Can anyone report on the vista friendliness of this version?

No problems with Ultimate 32bit.
But then again, v0.95 had no problems either...

**RPGWiZaRD** · 08-22-2007, 10:55 AM

Originally Posted by Spawne32

So wait a minute, which one is more accurate??? Does this mean im going to have to redo all my readings for the heatsink roundup with the new core temp version?

This nothing new, G0 stepping CPUs have had misreadings of 15C too low temp. It's been explained before this version of Core Temp has been released a couple of times.

**Morais** · 08-22-2007, 10:56 AM

Very good found kalispimenta!Thanks for sharing!

**Spawne32** · 08-22-2007, 10:58 AM

Originally Posted by RPGWiZaRD

This nothing new, G0 stepping CPUs have had misreadings of 15C too low temp. It's been explained before this version of Core Temp has been released a couple of times.

Thats not what im asking, the temps on the new version are higher then that of .94, this goes the same for my E2140, E4500, and most likely my soon to be B3 stepping Q6600 i have coming, are the readings im taking for the heatsink roundup inaccurate on the .94 version?

**Yoxxy** · 08-22-2007, 11:10 AM

Yes they are inaccurate,

But B3 should still have the same Core Temp @ 100 TCASEMAX.

**Leeghoofd** · 08-22-2007, 12:18 PM

mm my readouts still seem borked on that E6600 744G, Asus probe read out 30°C for cpu on idle while this coretemp gives 23°C for both cores lol

**Solarfall** · 08-22-2007, 12:45 PM

well it seem that at least in my case the temps are swing more realistic numbers now

**RPGWiZaRD** · 08-22-2007, 12:55 PM

Isn't it supposed to show default vcore only?

**Solarfall** · 08-22-2007, 01:00 PM

Originally Posted by RPGWiZaRD

Isn't it supposed to show default vcore only?

lol yeah now that i think of you are right.. my mistake

**STaRGaZeR** · 08-22-2007, 01:05 PM

Originally Posted by Solarfall

well it seem that at least in my case the temps are swing more realistic numbers now

VID is not vCore

**Chri$ch** · 08-22-2007, 01:17 PM

something is going wrong...

E6550 G0 ES @ 3.73Ghz (1.296v VCore) Watercooled

I think the temps with CT 95.4 are wrong

**Kunaak** · 08-22-2007, 01:28 PM

haha...

you think its wrong, cause you want to believe its super low, cause low numbers make you feel better.
no different then people with abit boards going "wow, my G0 is at 12C".
trust me... your better off assuming the temps are too high, then too low.

**Gautam** · 08-22-2007, 01:31 PM

QFT...get used to reality folks.

**Chri$ch** · 08-22-2007, 01:35 PM

Originally Posted by Kunaak

haha...

you think its wrong, cause you want to believe its super low, cause low numbers make you feel better.
no different then people with abit boards going "wow, my G0 is at 12C".
trust me... your better off assuming the temps are too high, then too low.

i think it is the ES CPU. I had a E6750 Retail and this had ~15 - 20°C lower temps
than my ES with CoreTemp 94!

Look at post #2, he had with 1.52v VCore and higher room temp better temps as
my E6550

For Retail OK, but i think ES Temp is wrong with 95.4

**Viss** · 08-22-2007, 01:51 PM

Have seen realistic G0 readings with 0.94 before, not sure they were ES though. Maybe not all readings were wrong. Previous 0.95 version never worked for me with commando, never had a problem with 0.94.

**Hornet331** · 08-22-2007, 01:58 PM

no difference for me to normal 0.95 version.

also since 95 i only use delta temps.

everyting above 20°C is fine for me. (@ orthos small fft im at 29-30°C)

**Spawne32** · 08-22-2007, 02:05 PM

E6700 isnt a G0 tho loc.o

Thread: new core temp 0.95.4 beta

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Rate This Thread

Display

new core temp 0.95.4 beta

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions