CineBench 10 out

[[XC] riptide]

Well they are...

1 CPU: 3747
x CPU: 13000

OpenGL: 6388

And yes, I used a magnifier to get those for you, lol.

Damn tough crowd...

1CPU: 3747
X4 CPU 13003

Open GL: 6388

[Movieman]

Damn tough crowd...

1CPU: 3747
X4 CPU 13003

Open GL: 6388

Don't worry, some day your cpu will grow up, have a baby and then with a 2 cpu board you can play here!

( Yes, another friend that I can tease!)

[safan80]

Don't worry, some day your cpu will grow up, have a baby and then with a 2 cpu board you can play here!

( Yes, another friend that I can tease!)

lol only if your power supply grows up too

[Movieman]

lol only if your power supply grows up too

PCP+C 610W silencer..Have one on each clover machine for the last 8 months.
No issues at all..

[safan80]

PCP+C 610W silencer..Have one on each clover machine for the last 8 months.
No issues at all..

how many hard drives and what's the graphics card?

[Movieman]

how many hard drives and what's the graphics card?

These are pure crunchers..single 80 gig HD and a cheapo ATI X550 vid.
One does have a complete Swiftech H20-220 water cooling kit so it handles the pump,6-120mm fans and a 92mm fan in addition to the HD.
http://www.xtremesystems.com/modules...wcontent&id=48
Both machines show a rock solid 12.1 on the +12 line in bios and they are at 100% load 24/7..

[veilsidebr]

veilsidebr here's my volts for 3.4
cpu 1.49v actual, fsb 1.4v, spp 1.40v, mcp 1.50v, ht 1.2v
pci-e @ 130
3.5 takes about 1.55v actual
I don't do benchmarks very often I'm mainly a gamer.

nice, i shall try those when i get some spare time.

i wonder whats going on to not boot over 3.2 ghz(altough i havent tried as i should), should i raise memory voltage togheter with cpu frequency? im not an expert at that, maybe i should, because i am keeping same 2.1v for any cpu frequency i try.

i raised timings to 4-4-4-7 instead of 4-4-3-5, but i have no idea about if i have to change memory voltage aswell.

Dunno if this is correct tho.

thank you

[dengyong]

Gave it a go in xp64.

Much faster than vista.

[Dainas]

Vista x64

Vista sure eats the Opengl results. I'm having a fun time trying to figure out my new system, as what may be benchmark loop stable is not proving SMP folding stable.

[veilsidebr]

Vista x64

BTW my CPU was at 3.15ghz so forgive the typo, keeping it low because I'm not sure how to approach my ram as I not comfortable folding at 3.6ghz it would take to get back up to DDR800 speeds. Ohwell, fast enough for me.. Vista sure eats the Opengl results.

nice score, interesting that at same speed, you got over 12k and i got 11.2k i guess...maybe 64 bits OS that much quicker?

i was using Windows xp 32

[Dainas]

nice score, interesting that at same speed, you got over 12k and i got 11.2k i guess...maybe 64 bits OS that much quicker?

i was using Windows xp 32

Yeah that is pretty wierd, but plausible as cinebench does have a native x64 version. x64 sure is not doing me any favours in the graphical department though

I've lowered my clocks down to 3,105/345 as my ram does not seem to be able to handle 850 at stock timings indefinitely. Will replace those results soon.

[safan80]

the 64bit version wins in the cpu area while xp wins in opengl... just check the two that I posted.

[Lightman]

the 64bit version wins in the cpu area while xp wins in opengl... just check the two that I posted.

But under Win XP x64 you have both brilliant rendering speed and normal OpenGL performance !

[safan80]

But under Win XP x64 you have both brilliant rendering speed and normal OpenGL performance !

I like xp x64.. too bad it doesn't have DX10.

[veilsidebr]

I like xp x64.. too bad it doesn't have DX10.

does xp 64 has any stability difference comparing to its 32 bit version? Because when i had p4 631, i couldnt boot at 4.1 ghz on Xp 64, and could do it easily (yet not too stable) on 32bit...

[Charles Wirth]

QX6850 440x10 1.65v
Corsair DD3 7-7-7-15-1t @ 1760Mhz 2.25v

[Lightman]

does xp 64 has any stability difference comparing to its 32 bit version? Because when i had p4 631, i couldnt boot at 4.1 ghz on Xp 64, and could do it easily (yet not too stable) on 32bit...

Yes, it is based on Windows 2003 server kernel and thats the major difference.
Better in memory management, more stable in use (when system is rock stable), much quicker in loading, can use NUMA properly, etc... The only drawback is driver support from some manufactures

[veilsidebr]

Yes, it is based on Windows 2003 server kernel and thats the major difference.
Better in memory management, more stable in use (when system is rock stable), much quicker in loading, can use NUMA properly, etc... The only drawback is driver support from some manufactures

Nice, i always used it but had no idea how good it was on the track.

I shall format and install xp64 immediatelly, as soon as my fautly HD be replaced.

[dengyong]

One more try and a little flex of my GTX

[Charles Wirth]

64bit run @ 4.7Ghz

Ill post up the 32bit compare at the exact same speed and timing.