Page 5 of 54 FirstFirst ... 234567815 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 125 of 1337

Thread: [18th Anniversary] Asus Black Pearl - P5k-Premium Testing Report

  1. #101
    XS_THE_MACHINE
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    1,970
    Quote Originally Posted by AndyM View Post
    I'd like to see some tests myself. I'm wondering, could the power consumption differences be a result of the same vcore settings across the boards tested, but ASUS's voltage damper not letting the vcore droop as much resulting in more power draw in comparison to a droopier board?

    That said, I wish ASUS came out with this instead of the Deluxe...I like the mosfet placement much better than the Deluxe I have, and cant return and exchange for the same priced Premium as it is too old, doooh!
    Yup, that's what I suspect myself. I wonder what happens to the power consumption of a vdroop modded IP35 Pro?
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    I have a feeling that in 5 years. WD, Seagate etc will be some unknown names.
    (Posted by Shintai, 08-18-2008)

  2. #102
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    UK, London
    Posts
    325
    Guys is there any proof that Premium is better of Delux in terms of OC.

    Did anyone changed his mb from deluxe to premium and noticed 20 mhz higher stable oc on CPU or mem or something ?

    Also vdrop is that giving you any stability problem with deluxe ? Coz i can't see any advantage in fixing that anyway.
    i3770K@ 4.4 - 1.25v - TR120 Black+ Scythe GT AP-14
    Crucial Ballistix Tracer 4x4096 DDR3 1866Mhz
    Asus P8Z77-v Deluxe
    PowerColor HD R290 moded to X
    Samsung SSD 256GB 840 Pro
    Samsung HDD 7200RPM 2TB (2x1TB) SA(N)TA
    Corsair HX 650W
    Antec P182 +3x Scythe -800-1200RPM
    Asus 27" VN279QLB
    Logitech G100S, CM Storm Quick Fire TK
    Win 8.1

  3. #103
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    119
    awaiting XtremeTiramisu's test results

  4. #104
    INTEL inside
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Québec, Canada
    Posts
    3,258
    I confirm, the Premium is better with the quad core. The pwm was really hot with the Deluxe. It's better with the new components on the premium
    retired computer enthusiast

  5. #105
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    108
    Seems like there are a lot of minute differences on the P5K Premiums depending on batch and factory.

    The one on Newegg site has PCB made in Taiwan and MEC inductor beside the DIMM slots.

    The one on the first page has all round RIO inductors.

    I have two Premiums, one has RIO inductors all round but CPU area is 'brandless R68', and the second premium has a MEC inductor for the DIMMs but 'brandless R68' for the CPU area. Even the DIMM slot manufacturers are different for both boards! I'm getting a board with all 4 slots having the same kind of clips, while the other has differing pairs (like the one on the front page)!


    I haven't come across any other brand that has so many differing components for the same revision number.

    But I like the Premium, clocking my previously stubborn Crucial 10th Anniversary much better than my old board.

  6. #106
    Hardware Junkie
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Okinawa, Japan
    Posts
    917
    Got mine today, I will play with it over the weekend. My P5W DH was not playing nice with my Q6600 G0 so what better excuse?
    "You'll find happiness once you accept the inevitable or at least you won't be too pissed off" -- Me

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  7. #107
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    609
    Quote Originally Posted by AndyM View Post
    I'm wondering, could the power consumption differences be a result of the same vcore settings across the boards tested, but ASUS's voltage damper not letting the vcore droop as much resulting in more power draw in comparison to a droopier board?
    you're talking about a max of probably 0.1V & on average more like 0.05V - whilst it may be a partial reason I can't see it being the whole reason for a 20-40W difference.
    abit IP35 Pro, E6600, HD3870, FSP FX700-GLN
    abit AB9 QuadGT, E6400, 7900GTO, FSP FX600-GLN
    abit AX78 x2
    Asus P5N-E SLI, E6600, 8800GTS, Tagan 530W

  8. #108
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Marseille, Fance
    Posts
    719
    I have an issue with the premium

    when I set 4 4 4 12 2T in bios, load into XP and finally I have 4 5 5 15 ...

    any suggestion ?

    edit: found the problem, was memset
    Last edited by noobzed; 08-10-2007 at 09:32 PM.
    The Devil's Reject

  9. #109
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    119
    Still waiting to see some test results on the Premium from anyone that's got one ...

  10. #110
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    884
    For those who gets occansionally si~si~ sound with the on board sound, use the P5B Premium Vista sound driver will fix, now it is fine
    CPU: XEON W3540 & Gulftown Q3FE
    MB: Asus Rampage III Extreme
    RAM: Corsair GT2000C7 2G X 3 ADATA XPG+ 2200+ 2G X 3
    SSD: Adata S596 120G
    Display Card: Asus EAH 5870
    WaterCooling:
    Laing D5 Pump + Koolance D5 Top
    Radiator: KP 120.3
    CPU Block: HeatKiller 3.0 + EK full MB Block
    PSU: Antec TPQ 1200W OC
    Case: SilverStone TJ-07BW


  11. #111
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    1,173
    ordered 1 will be here wendesday with a q6600 go
    1

  12. #112
    Hardware Junkie
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Okinawa, Japan
    Posts
    917
    Quote Originally Posted by WSX View Post
    Still waiting to see some test results on the Premium from anyone that's got one ...
    I'm still learning and tweaking, I will try to have some results later on tonight.
    "You'll find happiness once you accept the inevitable or at least you won't be too pissed off" -- Me

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  13. #113
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    204
    Quote Originally Posted by nicepun View Post
    I'm still learning and tweaking, I will try to have some results later on tonight.
    nicepun, I am torn between getting a P5K Premium and assemble now or waiting until around December (college break) and getting an X38 board. I'm very interested in your results.
    Core 2 Quad Q6600 G0 at testing (L724A760)
    Asus P5W DH Deluxe
    eVGA Geforce 8800 GTX
    PC P&C Silencer 750 Quad
    2GB OCZ Platinum PC2-8000 EL
    Thermaltake Armor
    WC: DtekFuzion/ MCW60 / MCR320QP / MCP665

  14. #114
    Hardware Junkie
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Okinawa, Japan
    Posts
    917
    Quote Originally Posted by miochza View Post
    nicepun, I am torn between getting a P5K Premium and assemble now or waiting until around December (college break) and getting an X38 board. I'm very interested in your results.
    Anything in particular you would like to see? 450x8 is w/ 1.43vcore is no sweat thus far. I've been able to bench @ 4Ghz (3DMark06). I'm still trying to find the sweet spot.
    "You'll find happiness once you accept the inevitable or at least you won't be too pissed off" -- Me

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  15. #115
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    204
    Quote Originally Posted by nicepun View Post
    Anything in particular you would like to see? 450x8 is w/ 1.43vcore is no sweat thus far. I've been able to bench @ 4Ghz (3DMark06). I'm still trying to find the sweet spot.
    Not really anything in particular, I'll wait for you to find you 24/7. It's just having water cooling and a Q6600 G0 at 3 ghz seems like wasted potential
    Core 2 Quad Q6600 G0 at testing (L724A760)
    Asus P5W DH Deluxe
    eVGA Geforce 8800 GTX
    PC P&C Silencer 750 Quad
    2GB OCZ Platinum PC2-8000 EL
    Thermaltake Armor
    WC: DtekFuzion/ MCW60 / MCR320QP / MCP665

  16. #116
    Hardware Junkie
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Okinawa, Japan
    Posts
    917
    Well, so far when you enable the Intel RAID Controller, the OC because VERY UNSTABLE. Anyone else expriencing the same?
    "You'll find happiness once you accept the inevitable or at least you won't be too pissed off" -- Me

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  17. #117
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    183

    Smile

    Quote Originally Posted by nicepun View Post
    Well, so far when you enable the Intel RAID Controller, the OC because VERY UNSTABLE. Anyone else expriencing the same?

    I had this board for 2 days & couldnt get anything stable when raid is enabled. Needles to say I was the first to post on NE for a review.

  18. #118
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    1,124
    Have had the board 2weeks now and using raid0 isnt giving me any problems its has stable has a rock!

  19. #119
    Hardware Junkie
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Okinawa, Japan
    Posts
    917
    Quote Originally Posted by BigRigDriver View Post
    I had this board for 2 days & couldnt get anything stable when raid is enabled. Needles to say I was the first to post on NE for a review.
    What processor? Q6600?


    Quote Originally Posted by bro20000 View Post
    Have had the board 2weeks now and using raid0 isnt giving me any problems its has stable has a rock!
    I have 5 HDs, I will try with just one and see what happens.


    Also, are you using 8 or 4 pin for the cpu?

    Additional Comments:

    Just to give you an example of what I mean I set the OC to 480x7 and set the SATA to RAID, as soon as you see the windows logo it crashes and reboots, but if I set the SATA to IDE everything is fine and dandy.
    Last edited by nicepun; 08-13-2007 at 01:15 AM.
    "You'll find happiness once you accept the inevitable or at least you won't be too pissed off" -- Me

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  20. #120
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    10
    Check your PCIE frequency...Mine likes to bump up to 150 for some reason after tweaking settings in the BIOS occasionally and my drives set for AHCI but not RAID are not detected when that happens....

    Y2J

  21. #121
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    239
    so far, what defining aspects does the p5k-premium have over the p5k-deluxe?

  22. #122
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    52
    So who's been able to successfully run RAID0 with Vista? Who has tried and failed?

  23. #123
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    363
    Im running raid0 on one set of WD Raptors with Vista 64bit and raid0 on another set of WD Raptors with XP for a dual boot config.....no problems my end with Q6600 @ 3.6GHz - 9 x 400 fsb.

  24. #124
    Hardware Junkie
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Okinawa, Japan
    Posts
    917
    Quote Originally Posted by lowdog View Post
    Im running raid0 on one set of WD Raptors with Vista 64bit and raid0 on another set of WD Raptors with XP for a dual boot config.....no problems my end with Q6600 @ 3.6GHz - 9 x 400 fsb.
    Can you try 450x8 and report back. Thanks.
    "You'll find happiness once you accept the inevitable or at least you won't be too pissed off" -- Me

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  25. #125
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    1,124
    Am running raid 0 with vista 32bit fine! At 500x8

Page 5 of 54 FirstFirst ... 234567815 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •