wolfdale+yorksfield benchmarks?!?

[red]

Looks legit.

So what are the real world benefits of Wolfsdale and Yorkfield? Besides the 45nm manuf. process and larger cache. Don't see any temp readings in those screens. They should run at lower vcore and give off less heat right?

edit: nevermind, found the hkepc link.

Those aren't "clock/clock" numbers btw. Intel was comparing 3.33GHz with 1333FSB with 12MB and other goodies compared to 2.93GHz, etc, etc. You can verify the 15, 25, 40 numbers with this graph http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/31669/135/

[ziddey]

3.7 @ 1.1v. Wow.

Ryan

I doubt that is a correct Vcore reported in CPUz.I don't say it is not possible,i just doubt it .

If I had to guess, I'd say 1.100v means the vid is 1.212v, and vcore is actually set above roughly 1.33v. How far above 1.33v, it's not possible to say. Too high? likely :p. wonder what intel's spec sheets will say the max and abs max vcore for these cpu's will be.

and it's good to see many p965's that will indeed support 45nm after all

[cky2k6]

well, we will see what amd has in a few weeks hopefully. wolfdale is looking sweet, i hope barcelona will be able to at least catch up in a few spots...

[savantu]

http://www.hkepc.com/bbs/hwdb.php?ti...iew&rid=837360

Wolfdale benchmarks. Nothing more there to argue about. Also matches Intels early preview show

Did you ever doubt it will ?

[OBR]

Coolalers web is trustable place for me ...

[Morais]

Legit or not, the pics are a temptation

[h@RRy]

Coolaler is to be trusted, no speculation needed.

[red]

But the cpuz can't be trusted with voltages

[PetNorth]

Yeah, that looks great. Especially the games and power/temp results.

Idle (EIST Disable)
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Power - 61W
Temp - 41C

Intel Wolfdate 2.33GHz ES
Power - 43W
Temp - 31C

Max Power Loading Tools for Vista
Intel Core 2 Duo E6550
Power - 83W
Temp - 49C

Intel Wolfdate 2.33GHz ES
Power - 59W
Temp - 37C

LOL
Since when a Conroe at 2.33 consumes 83w? I thought it consumes clearly under 65w...

[Metroid]

But the cpuz can't be trusted with voltages

1.40.5 under. 1.140.8 fixed the issue, so do not take the voltage serious.

[gillll]

indeed Coolaler is trusted and i think to question it with a poll might insult some fox.

[Morais]

indeed Coolaler is trusted and i think to question it with a poll might insult some fox.

indeed.

[Blauhung]

http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_...sHoltJun07.pdf erwinz, slide 20 shows that 45nm is trending as 65nm yieldwise and targeting 65nm's current yield rate.

Hehe, they showed that to us at a BUM (business update meeting) everyone cracked up when we saw the last slide

what I would like to see is how high dfi's x38 board will scale. If that thing can hit 600fsb out of the box (considering the quality of the board and the cooling the p35 board has, shouldn't be a problem), then even with an 8 mult you can hit nearly 5ghz. If we're lucky, with some patience and tweaking we'll be able to see a 700fsb board, but that may take a while

eeek, imagine the horribly nasty latencies at 700.

[saaya]

i dont see any benchmarks on colaaler, and wth is up with all those teletubbies there?

about this:


40% more what? performance? performance per watt? im 100% sure that this isnt a 1:1 compare between 65nm and 45nm silicon.
its higher locked 45nm silicon with a faster fsb compared with slower, low fsb 65nm parts.

[Shintai]

i dont see any benchmarks on colaaler, and wth is up with all those teletubbies there?

about this:


40% more what? performance? performance per watt? im 100% sure that this isnt a 1:1 compare between 65nm and 45nm silicon.
its higher locked 45nm silicon with a faster fsb compared with slower, low fsb 65nm parts.

Its performance. But its also based on the frequency difference.

[Tobalou]

Dunno if someone already posted it but we have a lot of benchmark here :

http://www.hardspell.com/doc/hardwar...page21462.html

Enjoy

[Shintai]

Dunno if someone already posted it but we have a lot of benchmark here :

http://www.hardspell.com/doc/hardwar...page21462.html

Enjoy

Its HKEPCs results they use.

[Metroid]

115% with DivX sounds amazing. Anime FTW.

[saaya]

Its performance. But its also based on the frequency difference.

well how can you be so sure?
they dont clearly state it, and in case the performance isnt there they can say its performance per watt, which is easy since they are on 45nm.

[Shintai]

well how can you be so sure?
they dont clearly state it, and in case the performance isnt there they can say its performance per watt, which is easy since they are on 45nm.

Oh they do state it. Its just a matter of seeing all the slides and such.

This should also give you a hint

http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets...spx?i=2972&p=3

[AliG]

looks like that faster 24-way cache does seem to make a difference, everyone thought it would be a waste of time (of course a lot of the improved scores could be mainly due to sse4)

[-thc-(cZ)]

Now, I don't like to use this word but you do have to be a real NOOOOOB to question coolaler's pre-NDA results..

This is months before Conroe was ever available:

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...ad.php?t=95021

Don't pee-off the people that make this forum xtreme, man!

[turtle]

Dang, 480 FSB on the quad. I am impressed. I wonder how they will do on the DFI P35 or the X38's.

http://forum.coolaler.com/showthread...158813&page=14

[Eastcoasthandle]

Yorkfield 2.33 at 3.2 doing 14.422 SPI





E6700 2.66 at 3.45 doing 14.672 ambient 33C

Not bad at all.
1st SS drom link in OP

[Donnie27]

Yorkfield 2.33 at 3.2 doing 14.422 SPI


E6700 2.66 at 3.45 doing 14.672 ambient 33C

Not bad at all.

Dang!