Quote Originally Posted by lawrywild View Post
What are you complaining about? You get more memory dividers... what's bad about that?

600 @ 200fsb is the 2:3 divider

450 @ 300 is the 4:3 divider

Why should it be 1:1? You have 1:1 as well.

I really don't get what you're moaning about.
I don't understand why I get more memory dividers when I up the FSB from 200 to 300, while still using a 800 MHz FSB CPU. My understanding is that you don't get memory dividers lower than 1:1 if you have a 800 MHz CPU.

The math doesn't go in the 450:300 case.

Results from benchmarking indicate that 450 in the 300 case is actually 1:1 and that "600" in the 300 case is actually 4:3 == effective 400 MHz (800 in DDR speak).