And you're saying AMD doesn't cherrypick the data to suit itself?!
Let's see, hmmm, Turion vs Core Duo... yeah... current gen vs previous gen.... under 'competitive comparison'. Maybe Intel should compare C2Ds to Athlon XPs? That would be hilarious.
And your 2nd point about integrated graphics is exactly right, why is 'competitive comparison' regarding PROCESSOR PERFORMANCE fudged to become INTEGRATED GRAPHICS PERFORMANCE?! To the average joe, this is clearly misleading. Furthermore, they crippled Intel with a crappy chipset.
Your post typifies the double standard in the industry. Anything AMD says is taken as gospel (though people are starting to become wary), they can even dupe analysts 2 weeks in advance of shocking quarterly earnings without anyone doubting them.
Originally Posted by Epsilon84
And you're saying AMD doesn't cherrypick the data to suit itself?!
Bookmarks