Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Loop tubing length question

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    316

    Loop tubing length question

    How much of a factor does the tubing length in a loop matter? I'm running my pump/res external (since it's an HTPC case) and want to locate the external unit further from the case so it's hidden away. To do this effectively (while keeping the res and pump level with the case) would require about 15-20 feet of tubing (rad/pump to case). Would this cause issues?

    I'm toying with an alternate solution that would not require this kind of distance but would look much less elegant in the room but only want to take that approach as a secondary choice.

    I also hard Cathar mention something about keeping the radiator low to the ground (I assume for cooler air). I was thinking of this as well but that would place the radiator about 4ft lower than the pump and the pc, would that be an issue?

    I'm running the Laing DDC 3.1 that's from Koolance in the RP-1000 unit.

    Thanks

  2. #2
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Arizona, USA
    Posts
    1,700
    Hmmm... If you really want to do that, you are going to need a stronger pump.

    On the other hand, this is what I saw from Petra's:
    Max. Head Pressure (at 12V): 8.2 psig (18.91 feet - 5.76m)
    It could be feasible.


    Core i7 920 D0 B-batch (4.1) (Kinda Stable?) | DFI X58 T3eH8 (Fed up with its' issues, may get a new board soon) | Patriot 1600 (9-9-9-24) (for now) | XFX HD 4890 (971/1065) (for now) |
    80GB X25-m G2 | WD 640GB | PCP&C 750 | Dell 2408 LCD | NEC 1970GX LCD | Win7 Pro | CoolerMaster ATCS 840 {Modded to reverse-ATX, WC'ing internal}

    CPU Loop: MCP655 > HK 3.0 LT > ST 320 (3x Scythe G's) > ST Res >Pump
    GPU Loop: MCP655 > MCW-60 > PA160 (1x YL D12SH) > ST Res > BIP 220 (2x YL D12SH) >Pump

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    316
    Quote Originally Posted by ColonelCain View Post
    Hmmm... If you really want to do that, you are going to need a stronger pump.

    On the other hand, this is what I saw from Petra's:


    It could be feasible.
    I guess that's what I'm wondering about, the "head" rating. Doesn't that refer to the amount of fluid that can be pumped vertical, without the pump failing to move the liquid? Or does it refer to the maximum length of line?

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Aberdeenshire, Scotland
    Posts
    78
    It's essentially the head of water that can be pumped vertically by the pump.

    The pressure drop from a length of hose would be pretty minimal I would have thought, as long as it's on the level.

    Jokester
    Last edited by jokester; 07-08-2007 at 01:04 PM.

  5. #5
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Bend, Oregon
    Posts
    5,693
    Still working on a whole bunch of flow rate tests, but I did run component tests, and I found that:

    At high flow rate 10' of tubing is close to the same amount of restriction as an MCW60 or an MCR320. It's a little more restrictive than it theoretically should be and not sure why. Almost no difference between 7/16" and 1/2" ID.

    Also as far as pressure head and elevation, don't worry about it, doesn't matter in a close loop because the pressure energy of the coolant coming back down will power it up on the other side. This is potential energy and because it's always returning to the same point there is no potential energy loss, we only have frictional energy losses to deal with. The only way that could ever be an issue is if you exceeded the max pressure head rate when bleeding the system, and you could fix that by simply having a taller funnel..

  6. #6
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    772
    wait, if the pump and case is level then it wont make a difference. you'll be fine
    For the record I am not sick, nor am I a gamer, nor am I a sick gamer. That name just sounds really cool to me but dont put me under that stereotype at all.

    nevermind... addicted to COD4 and Free Online Games baby!

  7. #7
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    316
    Sounds good. I'm actually waiting for some new Masterclear (sp) tubing to arrive next week. Going to replace all the tubing in the setup along with adding in some less restrictive connections (removing a couple of elbows for example).

    I just did a "visual" test today with some sleeving over the tubing and painting the RP-1000's case black (it's silver originally). So far I like the look and might not go with the real long loop after all, unless I lower the radiator (it's just below the PC in back of the stereo enclosure.) Here's a shot of the setup:









    Right now I'm using generic 3/8 pvc tubing with Swiftech coils under the black sleeving. Part of the issue I have with the tubing is that it was slightly deformed (somewhat oval) from being stored in a roll. I'm assuming the Masterclear doesn't have this issue. I kinda doubt it effects flow much, but we'll see.

  8. #8
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Bend, Oregon
    Posts
    5,693
    Nice setup, you'll like the masterclear tubing.

    I have both the masterclear and tygon R3603, and they are both great. The tygon is slightly softer so you don't have as much pressure on blocks, but from what I could see they both have about the same bend radius. The masterclear is actually nicer looking, tygon has a slight hazy opaque look to it in comparison.

  9. #9
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Bulgaria
    Posts
    119
    Tubing lenght does matter! IF you use smaller ID tubing - under 10mm. I'm currently conducting some computer simulations on flow rate/pressure drop/ID/length.

    So generally what kills the loop is not the blocks, rad or length - it's the ID. Don't use anything under 10mm. Another thing is the connections and splits - less = way better.

    Just to give you an idea of how important the ID is:

    blocks/rad: apogeegt, mcw60, heatercore (manufacturer stated or estimated pressure drop)
    pump: Sicce NOVA - 1.6m H2O, 800l/hr
    tubing: 8mm, 10mm, 11mm, 12mm, 13mm, 14mm (theoretically)
    length: 0.95m, 1.3m, 1.9m
    Simulation run with no connectors, barbs and so.

    Here you go:



    And with different pumps @ 0.95m tubing length:



    And some calculations for the tubing only (no blocks, nothing):



    Conclusions (WIP):
    1. ID<10mm is an overkill!
    2. ID>=13mm - enough. Bigger ID = nothing more.
    3. 10mm<ID<13mm - length matters most! Every cm of it means less flow.


    I will post all results soon, after a few more simulations.

    ABYSS
    DFI LP UT nF4 Ultrа-D rev.AD0 704-2BTA
    Opty 165 LCBWQ 0722RPAW... 3150@1.506V measured ... Done
    2x1GB Apacer CL3 UCCC @ 282MHz, 3-4-4-8, 1T, 2.65V ... Done
    XFX 7900GS 480M... 650/1750MHz, no vmods for now ... Done

    Water:
    pics soon ...
    ApogeeGT ... Installed
    MCW60 ... Installed
    MCR320 ... Installed
    3x Delux-dirt-cheap 120mm fans ... Installed
    DDC3.2 w/ Alphacool top ... Installed
    Aignep nickel plated G1/4 to 12mm barbs ... Installed
    Custom glass res ... Installed
    2m of 12/16mm Reimatic tubing ... Installed


    Personal list of kills: NW2.53, NW2.6, NW2.8, IS7, IC7-MAX3, P4P800 Deluxe (2), P4C800 Deluxe (478 mobo MOSFETs SUCK), V9999GE, 7600GS 128DDR3, Vitesta 566 2x256MB, Sicce NOVA pump x2
    Personal list of achievements: OSA144DAA5BN CAB2E 0546FPCW @ 2952MHz, 1.693V on XtremeAir Sonic Tower=>1M, 8M
    SINGLE GALAXY 7600GS @ 748(720)/1800MHz, 1.615V vGPU, 1.89V vMEM ==> 3D01SE 29294, 3D03 15905, 3D05 7291, 3D06 3701

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •