As many of us know, when a result is too spectacular there is the increased risk of having it declared invalid. This has always been a sore point about the quorum system for those of us who like to run heavily-overclocked machines.
As many of us know, when a result is too spectacular there is the increased risk of having it declared invalid. This has always been a sore point about the quorum system for those of us who like to run heavily-overclocked machines.
Wow, thats a great bench. That is borderline optimized good. Pity they couldnt have done this sooner - when it actually mattered and was relevant.
Oh well, water under the bridge...
-SS
Ok guys here is my problem:Originally Posted by linflas
clover3 @ 3.15 benched under 5.10.7 3108/6921. So scale linear:
clover3 @ 3.60 would be about 3552/7909
Now compare that with 3453/10403
It looks like boinc is still inconsistant with the integer benches. So maybe clover3 needs a couple of rebenches in order to get the "new" bench.
Dual Clovertown @ 3.2 GHz (stock Vcore), 4x1GB 667 FB-DIMMS, SM X7DAE, Silencer 610 PSU, Windows server 2K3 EE.
(professionally built & generously hosted by movieman)
AMD64 X2 4400+ @237x11 (1.39v), Corsair TwinX2048-3500LL @2.5-3-2-6-1T (2.75V), MSI K8N Neo4, Tagan 420W PSU, Windows XP Pro SP2.
My C2D is benching at
3309 Whet/7529 Dhry
How does this compare with other E6700's? I'm running at 2261 MHz and 336.1 Mhz Bus with a Rated FSB of 1344.
Hey, You! Know anyone that died of Cancer or Aids? Do something about it. Crunch for World Community Grid. Join Xtreme Systems in helping fight the most important war in human history. The war on disease. WCG needs YOU!
World Community Grid Registration
assuming you mean 3261mhz?
Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
The XS WCG team needs your support.
A good project with good goals.
Come join us,get that warm fuzzy feeling that you've done something good for mankind.
Well, I have only been doing this a few days, according tot he WCG stats page, everything that has been validated is good, no problems yet with half points or failures.
Q6600 @ 3.6, cheap water cooling, and crunching 24/7
Wow. i benched at 4Ghz (E6600) a few times and didn't break 9k?
Maybe its 64bit Vista????
EDIT: Ahh 5.10.8
Last edited by [XC] riptide; 06-26-2007 at 03:32 PM.
Just curious but how many running processes to you have in Vista64? How many benches did it take to get that?
Ok. 5.10.8 On XP32... Max bench at 3.7Ghz is
27/06/2007 00:34:54||Benchmark results:
27/06/2007 00:34:54|| Number of CPUs: 1
27/06/2007 00:34:54|| 3495 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
27/06/2007 00:34:54|| 7808 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
27/06/2007 00:34:55||Resuming computation
27/06/2007 00:35:03||Running CPU benchmarks
27/06/2007 00:35:04||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
27/06/2007 00:35:35||Benchmark results:
27/06/2007 00:35:35|| Number of CPUs: 1
27/06/2007 00:35:35|| 3549 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
27/06/2007 00:35:35|| 7844 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
27/06/2007 00:35:36||Resuming computation
27/06/2007 00:36:12||Running CPU benchmarks
27/06/2007 00:36:13||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
27/06/2007 00:36:44||Benchmark results:
27/06/2007 00:36:44|| Number of CPUs: 1
27/06/2007 00:36:44|| 3543 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
27/06/2007 00:36:44|| 7989 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
27/06/2007 00:36:45||Resuming computation
27/06/2007 00:36:49||Running CPU benchmarks
27/06/2007 00:36:50||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
27/06/2007 00:37:21||Benchmark results:
27/06/2007 00:37:21|| Number of CPUs: 1
27/06/2007 00:37:21|| 3554 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
27/06/2007 00:37:21|| 7920 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
27/06/2007 00:37:22||Resuming computation
27/06/2007 00:37:26||Running CPU benchmarks
27/06/2007 00:37:27||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
27/06/2007 00:37:58||Benchmark results:
I have disbled only a few of the services in vista, honestly not many of them.
I had win explorer, msn, IE7 and newsleecher open when I ran those benches, and I only ran them once, 12 hours or so apart.
I got my first invalid today, have no idea what this means.
Result Log
<core_client_version>5.8.15</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<stderr_txt>
Failed to get VersionInfo size: 2
Failed to get VersionInfo size: 2
Failed to get VersionInfo size: 2
</stderr_txt>
]]>
Last edited by linflas; 06-26-2007 at 04:03 PM.
Q6600 @ 3.6, cheap water cooling, and crunching 24/7
I'm still having issues with my desktop crashing even while its installed as a service.. Whats going on here. I even put the cpu at stock speeds to see if it had something to do with my oc but it still did it.. I'm running 5.10.8 now so lets see if it still does it..
AHHHHHHHHH FUDGE!!I'm still having issues with my desktop crashing even while its installed as a service.. Whats going on here. I even put the cpu at stock speeds to see if it had something to do with my oc but it still did it.. I'm running 5.10.8 now so lets see if it still does it..
i got the same error today. Explorer crashed, but windows didnt reboot. Just had the mouse cursor run all over the screen without anything in but a background.
This the same error you getting eric?
Nadeshiko: i7 990 12GB DDR3 eVGA Classified *In Testing... Jealous?*
Miyuki: W3580 6GB DDR3 P6T-Dlx
Lind: Dual Gainestown 3.07
Sammy: Dual Yonah Sossoman cheerleader. *Sammy-> Lind.*
Its my fault.. and no im not sorry about it either.[12:37] skinnee: quit helping me procrastinate block reviews, you asshat. :p
[12:38] Naekuh: i love watching u get the firing squad on XS
Yes, my problem exactly.. Although it does keep crunching
Theyve pulled 5.10.7 from download so something is pretty borked with it.
-SS
I'm guessing 5.10.8 will be next on the chopping block.
CTR-ALT-DEL -> File -> New Task -> run cmd -> then type explorer.exe <Enter> and you are back in business.
DDTUNG
Last edited by DDTUNG; 06-27-2007 at 09:44 PM.
XtremeSystems - we overclock and crunch you to the ground
I left the optimized files on three 3GHz P4 HTs. Ban me.
Yes, and to be blunt, I don't consider closing explorer an issue. A bit more left for the machine to use..One less process and maybe 10-14MB ram freed.CTR-ALT-DEL -> File -> New Task -> then type explorer.exe <Enter> and you are back in business.
DDTUNG
IF that was the only issue, I'd be a happy camper..
Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
The XS WCG team needs your support.
A good project with good goals.
Come join us,get that warm fuzzy feeling that you've done something good for mankind.
Its not much of an issue to run and crunch without explorer but it still tells me there is an issue somewhere.. Which bothers me.
Yes Dave, that's what 5.10.8 does most of the time, though it also causes Boinc to shut down once in a while. Overall I would say it's a improvement over 5.4.11 which I was using.Yes, and to be blunt, I don't consider closing explorer an issue. A bit more left for the machine to use..One less process and maybe 10-14MB ram freed.
IF that was the only issue, I'd be a happy camper..
DDTUNG
XtremeSystems - we overclock and crunch you to the ground
I left the optimized files on three 3GHz P4 HTs. Ban me.
I haven't had any problems with 5.10.7 installed as single user on my notebook. My main rig is still running 5.8.15 just because I can't upgrade it. The installer flips a tit saying it can't find a file. I check that path and the file is in fact there. Not a big deal though, I need to repartition it soon.
I'm almost always available on Steam to chat. Same username.
jspace, just copy ALL thie files out of your BOINC folder on an already upgraded machine to the one you can't upgrade with the BOINC service stopped. Then, restart the BOINC service. You are upgraded.
Hey, You! Know anyone that died of Cancer or Aids? Do something about it. Crunch for World Community Grid. Join Xtreme Systems in helping fight the most important war in human history. The war on disease. WCG needs YOU!
World Community Grid Registration
Yes, I know it is a few extra steps to upgrade, but since I plan on wiping the drive and reinstalling windows, I don't see the point. Especially since I'm not really running BOINC projects on there ATM. I had to start running WCG on my laptop because sch.... err... the place where I have most of my crunchers is moving things and they are shutdown.
I have to do things like you said alot, my C:\ drive is only 4GbIt was a
installing the service pack for it a few months ago. I should be getting my water loop (FINALLY!) soon, that is when I plan to clean/organize/tidy up all my files, cables, and dust. When that happens I will install whatever the latest 64-bit client is and re-commit to WCG.
I'm almost always available on Steam to chat. Same username.
BOINC 5.10.12 beta is available.
http://boinc.berkeley.edu/download_a...2&type=win_new
Again it's a beta, so use at your own risk.
Thanks Sierra, installed the 64bit version, does not seem to have fixed the odd benchmarks I got though.
7/5/2007 7:49:31 AM||Running CPU benchmarks
7/5/2007 7:49:41 AM||Can't start benchmarks - they're already running
7/5/2007 7:50:02 AM||Benchmark results:
7/5/2007 7:50:02 AM|| Number of CPUs: 2
7/5/2007 7:50:02 AM|| 3408 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
7/5/2007 7:50:02 AM|| 10252 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
Not sure, but I seem to be helping the quorum quite a bit as I am claiming alot more points that I am getting, only getting about 91-93% of what I claim. Oh well, all are coming across as valid, so that is all I can ask.
Q6600 @ 3.6, cheap water cooling, and crunching 24/7
Could you please do me a favor and post a screen shot of your daily wcg points along with your clocks and runtime.. I am really curious if your doing better than any other E6600 at the same speed and runtime. Thanks!
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks