Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was
Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was
Barcelona is coming next week, as AMD said
source
![]()
![]()
don't listen bad BS guy's, it's BS. AMD don't lie![]()
SERVER chips man
server chips
LOL, that might be a new record.
Lets just relax and see when it comes. It wont be soon, thats for sure.
Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.
Not quite. He's merely reporting (while not providing citation) Charlie/Groo's back-down from his 2.9GHz story, posted in the forums on aces.
Basically, Charlie is now claiming that *power* usage would allow for 2.8GHz eventually within a reasonable TDP, but there are other issues besides power hampering frequency.
Even the Fuad story says 2.4GHz at launch, and they hope to make it faster later.
And Fuad says that launch is now Q4.
But given Fraud's track-record, I wouldn't believe either story based on him alone.
Last edited by BrowncoatGR; 06-18-2007 at 11:34 AM.
Seems we made our greatest error when we named it at the start
for though we called it "Human Nature" - it was cancer of the heart
CPU: AMD X3 720BE@ 3,4Ghz
Cooler: Xigmatek S1283(Terrible mounting system for AM2/3)
Motherboard: Gigabyte 790FXT-UD5P(F4) RAM: 2x 2GB OCZ DDR3 1600Mhz Gold 8-8-8-24
GPU:HD5850 1GB
PSU: Seasonic M12D 750W Case: Coolermaster HAF932(aka Dusty)
You do realize that DailyTech is as much Anandtech as Myspace is to MurdochSo what's your problem with either, anyway?
http://scientiasblog.blogspot.com/20...-of-storm.html
Probably the most accurate view of the K10 state.
Well at least refreshing, after one week where it went from 2.4ghz only in Q2 to 2.6ghz in Q1 to 2.4Ghz at launch but only because AMD don't need more as the chip clock above 3ghz.
Priceless.
He speculated out from that number. And that number is both estimated and in a type AMD already own intel in.
But the real problem is those numbers dont hold water in terms of average/realworld applications. If they did you would be playing games on a K8 and not a Core 2 for maximum performance.
And if not specrate, then what? Another heavy (synthetic) memory limited benchmark?
Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.
First he correlates Intel releasing Conroe on B2 and therefore hoping that AMD will, then guesstimates performance of K10, then tries to explain AMD's no show at Computex, so..was he trying to make a point or somethingOf course, I can see why you link him, him being an AMD propagandist, with nuts sprinkled on top and all
![]()
The guy is Sharikou's twin brother , move along please.
Savantu referring to him as "sharikou's brother" is calling the kettle black.
It isn't IQ that's the problem. They're just not reading the title, "AMD Barcelona thread". Not thread crap with Intel fanboy propaganda. There's a similar problem with any 2900XT threads, where nVidia fanboys ignore the title to swoop in with more propaganda.
>> i5 750 @ 3.6Ghz | CM212Plus + P12 | P55-UD3R [BIOS F2] | 4GB G.Skill CL8 | Zotac GTX 580
.: 4 x 1TB WD | Corsair TX750 | Lian Li PC-A70A | X-Fi | Logitech Z-2300
Bookmarks