Radeon HD 2900 XT vs. 320MB 8800 GTS

[gdogg]

8800GTS

CSS 1680*1050
16xQ

so the point is moot.

Oh thanks for providing your fps, and using a resolution I didn't. Not using MSAA and forcing your aa levels.

MOOT that point. ThX.


"You're playing CS:S and bragging about frame-rates? The x1950xtx could match you on that one. Well, other than 8xMSAA, but could do it with 6x.

You're playing a 3 and a half year old game that was easy on videocards when it released. I know, I played it with a 6800GT just fine at 1680x1050.

Try loading up stalker yourself and you'll see the exact performance problems they're talking about."

Guess a x1950 pro user says otherwise.

Note the higher resolution 1900X1080, and 150-200 fps next time, I don't like stalker, if it was a good game, then maybe i'd care about its performance, but to me, its doom3. Dark, and this ... http://www.gamershell.com/pc/stalker...ts.html?id=363

I can also play a new game, civ 4 @ 1900X1080 maxed out, 16X AA (in game setting) without any lag.

So in all honesty, its driver issue, plus problems the stalker devs will have to fix, since there as much to blame.