Results 1 to 25 of 32

Thread: K10 slower than C2Q in Cinebench, clock for clock!

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338
    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    Compare to dual core K8 and you get that core per core this K10 sample would be slower than 4 years old K8 design,which doesn't make sense at all...
    Because of the scaling of Cinebench, you can't compare 4 core vs. 2core. We'll need an underclocked Quad-FX system and C2Q system to do full comparisons....

    EDIT: and everyone, stop attacking/bashing gOJDO....final warning, seen it in way too many threads.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    772
    Quote Originally Posted by Vapor View Post
    Because of the scaling of Cinebench, you can't compare 4 core vs. 2core. We'll need an underclocked Quad-FX system and C2Q system to do full comparisons....
    Spot on. Where is Movieman w/ his Kentsfield? He does a lot of benching on that machine.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •