MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 32

Thread: K10 slower than C2Q in Cinebench, clock for clock!

Threaded View

  1. #8
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,341
    Quote Originally Posted by Starscream View Post
    do u know 100% shure that cache doesnt have a huge impact on k10.
    and do u know for shure that this 1.6ghz version has 4x128kB L1, 4x512kB, 1x2048kB L3
    hey its gODJO he knows it all... and he is very good in calculations and posting preffered when it is bad for AMD and good for INTEL.

    its an nfore 3400 btw so that is a socket am2 board !!!! according to all nvidia papers. So how can it be a barcelona cpu? they are demonstrating budapest

    Quote Originally Posted by gOJDO View Post
    All K10 will have 128kB of L1 and 512kB of L2 per core and 2MB of shared L3 cache among all cores.
    nope "shangai" is also a K10 on the roadmap and this one will have more cache.

    and cache + latency does make a difference performance wise for the k8 check the differences between caches with: 512 on 90nm 1024 on 90nm and the 512 on 65nm
    Last edited by duploxxx; 06-06-2007 at 04:22 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman View Post
    Fanboyitis..
    Comes in two variations and both deadly.
    There's the green strain and the blue strain on CPU.. There's the red strain and the green strain on GPU..

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •