Quote Originally Posted by gOJDO View Post
1. You haven't understood what he said. 4 K10 CPUs are performing a little beat more than 4000 pixels/s, while 4 K8 CPUs are performing 2200 pixels/s. The 4 K10 CPUs finished one task for 56s, while the K8 finished the same task for 112s. That is 2X performance, not 4X.
2. If something is said by the_INQ it is BS or FUD by default.
again, 16 K10 cores performed a task in half the time as 8 K8 cores, at twice the performance

assuming POVray scales like most say it does, that would mean you would need 32 K8 cores to match the 16 K10 cores (double the K8 cores to match the pixels/s, then double that to match the time)... theoretically