-
I linked to toms hardware when? lol And I'm sure you thought "inaccurate"? So your saying the IQ is accurate reporting? When thats not the only source of info you can get it from. Guess you don't look too hard for world wide facts... ;D
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&s...celona&spell=1
If the ATI take over from AMD wasn't a true enough rumor once thought of to be impossible nothing would be true with your close mindedness... "when it happened". Next thing your going to tell me is K10 never happened, and benchmarks thought AMD has done and are saying are 50%+ faster then C2Q are really just hype?
When we have 400,000+ on ALU and 300,000+ on FPU performance at only 2.5ghz agenst a 3ghz C2Q that really says how fast a cpu is with truthfully said benchmarks from the ES sources, when intel only got 20% less in ALU and 50% less in FPU I'm sure C2Q is just killing K10 with a 70% less performance and power advantage all at if put on equal speeds. If being 70% ahead means K10 is slower and C2Q some how is faster by magic (A 4.7ghz C2Q equals a 2.5ghz K10 "OCing K10 anybody? a 6ghz C2Q is needed to equal a 3ghz K10." lol)... If intel can make 6ghz C2Q's stock... to ever counter a K10... That will be the day this girl goes bi unless I can OC it to 3.5ghz then intel can't touch this smexy box of mine. lmao
Last edited by Alxea; 05-13-2007 at 05:40 PM.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks