Quote Originally Posted by GoThr3k View Post
i don not try to change the subject...
brisbanes just suck less power
at that time the tdp of X2 was 89/109 and 125 for FX i think
the tdp of intel is not the same as the tdp of amd
you cannot compare,that test in xbitlabs is a nice test
we should see more of those tests
netburst, not core... core2 tdp is the exact same thing as k8 tdp, maximum thermal envelope for a particular family of processor. netburst was expected average consumption. brisbanes might suck around the same amount of power, but they suck alot more balls than core 2...