Page 7 of 22 FirstFirst ... 4567891017 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 175 of 539

Thread: 26 120mm Fans Tested and Compared

  1. #151
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338
    People seem to like them....but there's two versions IIRC. The first is just like the regular SL, but made of the transparent blue plastic. SUPPOSEDLY (this is from YL), the plastic has a tendency to rattle at higher speeds. The other version is a ~35CFM version that spins slower, pushes less air and is probably quieter. May compete with the Nexus fans tbh, just it's transparent blue with LEDs

    Both are probably safe bets for inexpensive yet good LED fans

  2. #152
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    35
    Quote Originally Posted by Vapor View Post
    Both are probably safe bets for inexpensive yet good LED fans
    Thanks!

  3. #153
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    2,588
    Would be interested to see the yate loon M and H added to the comparison.
    Quite a few folk choosing between the three specs of the yate loon buying from Petra all the time.

  4. #154
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Va.
    Posts
    161
    Hey Vapor,

    I noticed in your "Low Speed Fans Cooling a Processor" chart that the two Thermaltake fans out-performed the Yate Loon, but you seem to favor the Yate Loon in the All-Stars lineup... I'm just curious if this was due to the noise signature of the Thermaltake fans? or the lower CFM ratings in open air?

    Thanks.

  5. #155
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338
    "All-Stars" is a bit of a misnomer tbh....it was just a category to show that undervolted medium-speed fans are actually pretty good

    And yeah, the TT fans do pull ahead, but neither are subjectively quiet at all (read post #2)....honestly never even thought of them for the best fans. I've had this pointed out to me a few times (TT fans beating the Yate, yet the Yate is in the All-Stars category), and each time I go to retest them I just can't say the TT fans are better than the Yate.

  6. #156
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    South Englandshire
    Posts
    65
    Awesome work thank you.

  7. #157
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Va.
    Posts
    161
    Quote Originally Posted by Vapor View Post
    "All-Stars" is a bit of a misnomer tbh....it was just a category to show that undervolted medium-speed fans are actually pretty good

    And yeah, the TT fans do pull ahead, but neither are subjectively quiet at all (read post #2)....honestly never even thought of them for the best fans. I've had this pointed out to me a few times (TT fans beating the Yate, yet the Yate is in the All-Stars category), and each time I go to retest them I just can't say the TT fans are better than the Yate.

    Thanks - I did see your comments/notes about them being high-pitched and/or clicky, so I assumed that was the issue. I have a similar issue with S-Flex fans... they seem to be 'quiet' fans, but from the recordings I've heard, there's a underlying and noticable tonal-motor-whine-niose going on.

    Anyway, I took a chance and now have a Golfball on the way (very difficult to find the 120mm 2000, btw. I ordered it from performance-pcs, but they had to order it from germany). I'm hoping to tune it down into the 26-28 adjusted db range of your chart as a HSF cooler.

  8. #158
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    118
    Awesome, thanks for the hard work. This is helping me to choose the right fans, thanks!

  9. #159
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Adelaide, Australia
    Posts
    81
    Firstly I think everyone reading this has to be impressed with your unbiased efforts

    Secondly - spotted a typo; you should change the graph title for high speed fans on open air to radiator (I pressume this is what it should be)

    Finally ...

    Quote Originally Posted by Vapor View Post
    Exactly, perception is what's key here. The scale is logarithmic in order to quasi-linearize it to what we hear....but everyone's perception is different (and ever changing). This is one reason why a CFM/dB ratio is not applicable. (neither is a non-logarithmic scale)

    That said, since ambient in a very quiet room is ~20dB, saying 50CFM at 30dB is a better ratio than 25CFM at below-ambient noise levels is also preposterous. This is where high speed fans 'win'

    The few things that matter, IMO....are:
    1) maxing out fan performance for how much noise do you desire/require
    2) minimizing noise for an amount of performance you desire/require
    3) have flexibility in fan performance (undervolting for 24/7 and 12V for benching)
    Totally agree with you on this. I use the Panaflo H1BX (I call them FBA12G12H) for the logic you've stated.

    When you need the juice it's there - I use the onboard fan controller on my board to run the 3X panaflo rad fans - normally the system doesn't need high flow to cool things down and hence it's virtually silent, but when I have the headphones on gaming during a 40+C aussie summers day I'm glad the extra CFM is there ......


    EDIT - Point two - should have read post #19 & #20!!! first
    Last edited by Ambro; 05-08-2007 at 04:09 AM.
    LianLi PC-V2000B+ mod to fit PA160 & PA120.2, ASUS Striker Xtreme - Bios 1303, 2X 8800GTX XFX cooled with EK-FC8800 GTX - Acetal blocks, e6750 cooled with Storm Rev2 @ 3.5Ghz, EK NB/SB & Mosfet blocks, XTC cooling 4Gigs of Ballistix 8500 @ 1000Mhz, 2X loops with DDC-02 & petra tops, 1/2" to all components, EK-Multioption RES 150 per loop, BigNG & Analog Sensor Hub controlling all 120mm & 80mm Nexus & Panaflo fans throughout, ST85ZF PSU, 2X 74G WDRaptors, 2X500G Seagates, X-Fi Fatal1ty
    I went 1303 to get more than 449 FSB - currently I'm on 500 -

  10. #160
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    [M] - Belgium
    Posts
    1,744
    Quote Originally Posted by Vapor View Post

    Yeah, it does seem the Sharkoon and the ebmpapst do very well, they were black sheep in a way....didn't even notice that they beat out the Yate until I graphed it out

    .
    Your findings coincide with mine Sharkoon 2000 really shines, at low/high speed. The Noctua does okay in open air, but lags behind when pressure is needed (CPU cooling/radiator)

    my results here:
    http://www.madshrimps.be/gotoartik.php?articID=516
    http://www.madshrimps.be/gotoartik.php?articID=421
    http://www.madshrimps.be/gotoartik.php?articID=391

    Keep up the good work

    just quick note though, are you sure your decibel meter is not "A" weighed? dBA instead of dB? your results seem more in line with dBA, which is quite different from dB


    Belgium's #1 Hardware Review Site and OC-Team!

  11. #161
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338
    Yes, it is A weighted, I'll add that to the list of corrections I need to do. Thanks

    Until I read your reviews with CPU tests, I honestly hadn't considered it....but frankly, it's arguably more important than just raw CFM ratings.

    Anyway, part 2 has officially entered the planning stages. Not sure if I want to change the technique yet and carry over a few fans for reference points, or keep it all the same, gotta think that over.

  12. #162
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    38
    conclusion is ?

  13. #163
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Palo Alto, CA
    Posts
    4,150
    Quote Originally Posted by RobNyc View Post
    conclusion is ?
    Uh, did you see the charts? He just showed us which fans are good and which fans are bad. Before, people relied on other people's claims. "PANAFLOS ARE DA SHIEZ!" "your papst fans suck, they get owned by yate loons!!!"

    Vapor, do you think there would be anything wrong with overvolting a fan? I was thinking of overvolting enermax marathons
    Lenovo Thinkpad X220 - Core i5 2410m, 4gb
    waiting on 28nm video cards...

  14. #164
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338
    Quote Originally Posted by serialk11r View Post
    Vapor, do you think there would be anything wrong with overvolting a fan? I was thinking of overvolting enermax marathons
    Hmmm...haven't thought about it....without some sort of testing (even subjective), I really have no clue

  15. #165
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Vienna, Austria
    Posts
    330

    spcr article on fan air flow measurements

    there is an article on spcr on the way they are testing airflow. they found out, the way it was done before was a bit misleading and changed it. still leaning towards the way you are doing this vapor ...

    have alook at:
    http://www.silentpcreview.com/article734-page1.html

    and the discussion on this article at:
    http://www.silentpcreview.com/forums...er=asc&start=0

    btw. great job, vapor and very helpful - thanks for your work!
    Processor: Intel Core i7 990X
    Motherboard: ASUS Rampage III Extreme
    Memory: Corsair CMT6GX3M3A2000C8
    Video Card: MSI N680GTX Lightning
    Power Supply: Seasonic S12 650W
    Case: Chieftec BH-01B-B-B

  16. #166
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338
    Yeah, I saw that they changed their method...using the case as a duct should work well, but for some reason their 120mm fan results aren't doing as well as their 80mm fans (well, they literally are, but 80mm fans are at/beating spec while 120mm fans are lagging kinda behind in some cases)...haven't figured that one out yet. I probably missed something, initially read the article in a hurry before I left for work.

    When I first observed the 'spun air' issue (it was with a counter-clockwise spinning Tri-Blade Delta that spins the air SO MUCH that I was getting negative airflow results....it moved the anemometer's blades more due to the rotational movement of the air rather than the forward movement), I thought of a series of grills that would negate all spin (essentially a large scale version of a UV filter combined with a fine mesh grill), but also figured it would kill airflow too much. I recently saw the Mythbusters ep where they use a giant array of straws for essentially the same purpose and that would work as well...though also be restrictive. However, having the radiator test in place already, I really wanted a test that wasn't hampered with any impedance.

    So I just reversed the order....had the fan pull air through the anemometer with a shroud/duct in between. Nothing's lost, the shroud/duct is big enough that it doesn't get skewed from the backdraft of most fans (the big-big Delta even got spot-on results).

    Anyway, I'm glad they changed their results to now get repeatable results that are truly useful (the Noctua results from before....frustrated me a lot to say the least....and I could repeat them too with their old test method). Their intention is complete noise removal/suppression, so true CFM results don't mean as much....they need more sound signatures than anything else (which I don't have the means to properly do).

    Someone in that thread made a very good point I'd like to reiterate here: nearly all fans push the same amount of air at the same RPM. This is completely true. That's the one way I feel confident in looking at a manufacturer's specs and calling "BS" w/o testing (if they look realistic....Thermaltake's are easy).

    My purpose behind this is not the ultra-silent spectrum....but giving XS users data that says: "hey, this fan really isn't what the manufacturer says it is....here's some other fans that perform well for what you're looking for." Everyone knows their own noise limitations, or what kind of fan performance they need....they can choose their own fans.

    /soap-box

    I like their new method I look forward to reading their updated reviews, always like the originals until I saw that Noctua result.

  17. #167
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Va.
    Posts
    161
    Quote Originally Posted by Vapor View Post
    Someone in that thread made a very good point I'd like to reiterate here: nearly all fans push the same amount of air at the same RPM. This is completely true. That's the one way I feel confident in looking at a manufacturer's specs and calling "BS" w/o testing (if they look realistic....Thermaltake's are easy).
    That may be true - in open air (case fans) - but my primary concern is finding fans that perform the best on a HS or radiator while still having a reasonable noise level/signature. And this is where your test has proved very usefull to me, where the Noctua -> golfball (for example) at the same rpm range, produce wildly different results.

    Edit: more to the point - same dbA range, whether or not that's exactly the same rpm.

    Quote Originally Posted by Vapor View Post
    My purpose behind this is not the ultra-silent spectrum....but giving XS users data that says: "hey, this fan really isn't what the manufacturer says it is....here's some other fans that perform well for what you're looking for." Everyone knows their own noise limitations, or what kind of fan performance they need....they can choose their own fans.
    Exactly. Of course I still don't know what a golfball (and some of those other) fans sound like, but I will today or tomorrow .

    Thanks again for your efforts.
    Last edited by Spanki; 05-09-2007 at 11:01 AM.

  18. #168
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338
    Quote Originally Posted by Spanki View Post
    ...my primary concern is finding fans that perform the best on a HS or radiator while still having a reasonable noise level/signature. And this is where your test has proved very usefull to me, where the Noctua -> golfball (for example) at the same rpm range, produce wildly different results.

    Edit: more to the point - same dbA range, whether or not that's exactly the same rpm....
    Very good points, thanks

    BTW, to everyone who has said "Thank you" in some form or another, you're very welcome

  19. #169
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1
    BTW, to everyone who has said "Thank you" in some form or another, you're very welcome
    Thanks also, the review is very useful.

    If I may ask, did you consider either of these fans? On paper, their specs seem very good.

    http://www.silenx.com/ixtremaprofans.asp?sku=ixp-74-14

    http://www.thermaltake.com/dcfans/Co...2329/a2329.htm

  20. #170
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    227
    I am looking for some blue led fans.. choosing between the yate loons 120 (38.5 CFM, 25.4 dBA) and the Thermaltake Thunderblade 120mm LED Fan (Blue) (78 CFM, 21dBA) or??
    Thanks,

  21. #171
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338
    Quote Originally Posted by XBrit View Post
    Thanks also, the review is very useful.

    If I may ask, did you consider either of these fans? On paper, their specs seem very good.

    http://www.silenx.com/ixtremaprofans.asp?sku=ixp-74-14

    http://www.thermaltake.com/dcfans/Co...2329/a2329.htm
    I did consider testing the SilenX....but they're pricey and DEFINITELY overspec'd (everybody knows that by now)....but was interested in testing them for the sake of testing how overspec'd they are. The Thermaltake I didn't test because, well, just didn't seem interesting to me. Non-solid housings have never really been appealing and we know it's completely overspec'd (like all their fans).
    Quote Originally Posted by t1no View Post
    I am looking for some blue led fans.. choosing between the yate loons 120 (38.5 CFM, 25.4 dBA) and the Thermaltake Thunderblade 120mm LED Fan (Blue) (78 CFM, 21dBA) or??
    Thanks,
    Two very different fans there....the Yate is built for quiet operation why the Thermaltake is just a standard 78ish CFM blue fan. The Yate will be MUCH quieter, but also only move half as much air.

  22. #172
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    227
    Quote Originally Posted by Vapor View Post
    but also only move half as much air.
    But enough for case fans?

  23. #173
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    38
    the SilenX fan is not listed here and I read its probably 1 of the best
    Case . . . Antec 900 "Ultimate Gamer Case"
    Mobo . . . DFI LanPartyUT nF4 SLI-DR Expert
    CPU . . . AMD Opteron 165 CCBBE 0610 DPMW
    Sinks . . . Scythe Ninja Plus rev.B
    RAM . . . G.Skill F1-4000USU2-2GBHZ [2x1GB] (UCCC) [3-4-4-8]
    Video . . . eVGa 7950GT 256mb
    HDD . . . WD 2x250GB Sata | WD 200GB Sata
    DRIVE . . .NEC Black DVD+/-RW ND-3540A - IDE
    Power . . . Antec TruePower-II 430w
    Speakers . . . Logitech z-2200 Keyb/Mouse . . . Logitech MX3100

  24. #174
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338
    Quote Originally Posted by RobNyc View Post
    the SilenX fan is not listed here and I read its probably 1 of the best
    SPCR didn't think it was that good IIRC....

    Regardless, the specs mean nothing....they don't even list RPM specs on their newer fans

    They only list specs the typical user can't verify

  25. #175
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Philly/NJ
    Posts
    3,933
    silenx

Page 7 of 22 FirstFirst ... 4567891017 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •