I knew it, but I allowed a glimmer of hope to shine in my eyes.
/sigh
*waits onward for Penryn*
I knew it, but I allowed a glimmer of hope to shine in my eyes.
/sigh
*waits onward for Penryn*
No Q3 launch?? Intel is doomed, theres a problem with Penryn!First AMD, now Intel, what on earth are we going to do! Maybe IBM will save them both
![]()
BadAxe2, WC'ed L631B115 Xeon3060 3.4GHz 1.27v summer OC, 2GB BallistiX 4:5,
2x250GB-16 Raid-0 + 400GB-16, 7900GTO 512MB, Acer 22" Wide, Nexus 500W.
^^ Intel already demoed Penryn several times.
Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.
previewing didn't hurt thier sales, anyone extreme was on AMD already at the time, all the preview did was get amd enthusiasts drooling waiting for the launch so they could switch. as for the non-enthusiasts, they dont know the difference anyways.
on the other hand AMD has always been secretive with very little ES cpu's. i remember K8 was delayed and secretive and many people said it was not going to do well at launch. we all know what happened there. I'm not saying that will happen, i am just restating you don't really know anything until the cpu is under the pot.![]()
Did I hear right...
Penryn is suppose to be 20-25% faster clock per clock then Conroe and the lowest clocking chip will be @ 3.0ghz...? Will there be regular quad cores for sale? (non-extreme $1,000+ quad core...?)
Opteron 170 CCB1E 0550VPMW @ 2.65ghz 1.275 vcore (Big Typhoon) capable of 3ghz
OCZ Gold DDR400@2-2-2-5
74GB Raptor
DFI UT Ultra-D
Gigabyte 6600gt
-=The Gamer=-
MSI Z68A-GD65 (G3) | i5 2500k @ 4.5Ghz | 1.3875V | 28C Idle / 65C Load (LinX)
8Gig G.Skill Ripjaw PC3-12800 9-9-9-24 @ 1600Mhz w/ 1.5V | TR Ultra eXtreme 120 w/ 2 Fans
Sapphire 7950 VaporX 1150/1500 w/ 1.2V/1.5V | 32C Idle / 64C Load | 2x 128Gig Crucial M4 SSD's
BitFenix Shinobi Window Case | SilverStone DA750 | Dell 2405FPW 24" Screen
-=The Server=-
Synology DS1511+ | Dual Core 1.8Ghz CPU | 30C Idle / 38C Load
3 Gig PC2-6400 | 3x Samsung F4 2TB Raid5 | 2x Samsung F4 2TB
Heat
http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=6950
Expect the Core 2 Extreme QX6850 to arrive next quarter with pricing set at $999 per-unit
It is really annoying that they aren't going to have a new quad-core line up...meaning having a E8200,E8300,etc..
anyone know when I might be able to get a quad core costing around $300?? that is when I'm going to upgrade.
Opteron 170 CCB1E 0550VPMW @ 2.65ghz 1.275 vcore (Big Typhoon) capable of 3ghz
OCZ Gold DDR400@2-2-2-5
74GB Raptor
DFI UT Ultra-D
Gigabyte 6600gt
X38 that'll run DDR2
Quad extreme on Penryn core
waiting...
-Cpu:Opteron 170 LCBQE 0722RPBW(2.87ghz @ 1.300v)
(retired)Opteron 146 (939) CAB2E 0540
-Heatsink: Thermalright XP-90
-Fan:120mm Yate Loon 1650 RPM @ 12V, 70.5 CFM, 33dB
-Motherboard: DFI Lanparty nF4 UT Ultra-D
-Ram: Mushkin High Performance blue, 2gigs(2X1gig kit) PC3200 991434
-Hard drive: Seagate 400GB Barracuda SATA HD 7200.10(AS noisey model)
-Video card: evga 6800GS @520/1170
-Case: P180
-PSU:Enermax 535Watt EG565P-VE FMA (24P)
Intel didn't just pull Core 2 out of their ass. They had been developing it for a long while, as with the secret Yamhill. Fortunately for Intel they don't work like you think they do. They had already been planning their implementation of AMD64 long before they gave up fighting and they had already began their stratergy long before the 2 years you claim they spent planning.
Also, your 8 months makes little sense given that everyone was awing at Core 2 at about the same time last year (i.e. it's been nearly 12 months since Core 2 was first demoed so obviously it can't be 8 months since Intel got serious)
Bookmarks