Let me see how compliceated this is.
AM2 = AMD Sockett for chips that support DDR2
AM2+ = AMD Sockett for chips that support DDR2, + being added like something they use to do before when they put words like Turbo or Plus. In this case + on the end stands for a DDR2 supporting chip plus HTT 3.0 support.
AM3 = AMD Sockett for chips that support DDR3
AM3+ = AMD Sockett for chips that support DDR3 but have some updated feature that older generation of chips that used the same sockett didnt have. New motherboards that still feature same physicall sockett to be distincty different from older motherboards have to carry a new sockett name to show that they support new generation of cpu's.
Sockett 1207 is the server equivalent of the the AMx socketts. AMD keeps server chips in same socketts so that upgrading dose not requier new motherboard, one selling point for the "Barcelona" is that it can be put into current motherboard.
CPU's being pin compatibe within chip generation (i.e AM2 and AM2+) you can put any AM2 supporting, be it a HTT1.0 or HTT3.0 supporting chip will fit in all motherboards, only there is little reason why anyone would put HTT1.0 chip in a new HTT3.0 supporting motherboard.
Now AMD has not changed anything when it comes to what they will call AM2 sockette or AM3 or what they will be for. Sure we heard rumours what such named socketts names might be but AMD didnt tell us them selfs so they never changed thier mind about anything.
So tell me whats so confusing or changing about AMD sockett naming scheme's.
Some of the future chips will only support HTT1.0 links so there is no reason why anyone would use a AM2+ motherboard for a HTT1.0 chip, especally since AM2 sockett motherboard will be cheaper reason why HTT1.0 features on cheapers chips.
Last edited by Syn.; 05-07-2007 at 02:12 PM.
TAMGc5: PhII X4 945, Gigabyte GA-MA790X-UD3P, 2x Kingston PC2-6400 HyperX CL4 2GB, 2x ASUS HD 5770 CUcore Xfire, Razer Barracuda AC1, Win8 Pro x64 (Current)
TAMGc6: AMD FX, Gigabyte GA-xxxx-UDx, 8GB/16GB DDR3, Nvidia 680 GTX, ASUS Xonar, 2x 120/160GB SSD, 1x WD Caviar Black 1TB SATA 6Gb/s, Win8 Pro x64 (Planned)
I thought i was clear. AM2 is same as AM2+ just no HTT3.0.
Low-end chips which would go into low end motherboards will not need as much as bandwidth as top end. Therefore there is no reasony why low end chips should have HTT3.0 links which would make them cost more.
AM2 will still exist, hence the reason why its still on roadmap, together with AM2+ because they are one and the same. So my point being until AMD sees that thier low end chips are being heavly crippled by lack of bandwidth they will keep the HTT1.0 links in which would continue the support for AM2 sockett. So really the naming scheme has alot to do with it because AM2 is made for mass market consumers not hardware the likes of hardware builders that have Sockett 1207.
Did i mention that AM2 and AM2+ are the same sockett?
TAMGc5: PhII X4 945, Gigabyte GA-MA790X-UD3P, 2x Kingston PC2-6400 HyperX CL4 2GB, 2x ASUS HD 5770 CUcore Xfire, Razer Barracuda AC1, Win8 Pro x64 (Current)
TAMGc6: AMD FX, Gigabyte GA-xxxx-UDx, 8GB/16GB DDR3, Nvidia 680 GTX, ASUS Xonar, 2x 120/160GB SSD, 1x WD Caviar Black 1TB SATA 6Gb/s, Win8 Pro x64 (Planned)
Bookmarks