Results 1 to 25 of 1734

Thread: [First Look] DFI 680i LT NF-680i LT SLI (56K Warning~~~)

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    1,123
    Quote Originally Posted by virtualrain View Post
    I really think you guys should go with the EVGA board!
    Not bad advice actually....

  2. #2
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Fayetteville, North Carolina.
    Posts
    1,476
    Quote Originally Posted by bingo13 View Post
    Not bad advice actually....
    I agree for many.. But for me, my 3rd PCI-E video card is blockin the air intake on my upper 8800GTX and it now runs 12-15c hotter than the lower 8800. The DFI has a little different PCI/PCI-E configuration which would put the 3rd video card at the very bottom leaving plenty of breathing room for the 88's. also the 2 extra SATA ports are BIG for me. I really do not expect the DFI to perform "better" than the EVGA, I just hope its as good. In my opinion, the EVGA pwns every other 680i out right now. I haven't owned all the other 680i's while they had their most mature bios, but i have owned them all. I went back to the EVGA every time. SOoo, If you do not need the extra 2 SATA ports, and the PCI/PCI-E layout is ok for you, then i would also recommend the EVGA. A1 or T1 of course.
    Gigabyte Z68X UD7
    Intel Core i7 2600K (testing)
    16GB Mushkin Redline 17000 2133 1.65v
    EK, 3x120 Rad 2xMCP655
    Acer 1200w PSU
    2-128GB Samsung SSD RAID 0
    2-1TB Seagete 32mb RAID 0
    1-1TB Western Digital
    1- Plextor PX-B320SA Blue Ray
    1- Plextor PX-880SA 24x DVD/RW
    2- EVGA Nvidia GTX-480 SLI
    LG 30", Hanns G 28"

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    226
    Quote Originally Posted by nugzo View Post
    I agree for many.. But for me, my 3rd PCI-E video card is blockin the air intake on my upper 8800GTX and it now runs 12-15c hotter than the lower 8800. The DFI has a little different PCI/PCI-E configuration which would put the 3rd video card at the very bottom leaving plenty of breathing room for the 88's. also the 2 extra SATA ports are BIG for me. I really do not expect the DFI to perform "better" than the EVGA, I just hope its as good. In my opinion, the EVGA pwns every other 680i out right now. I haven't owned all the other 680i's while they had their most mature bios, but i have owned them all. I went back to the EVGA every time. SOoo, If you do not need the extra 2 SATA ports, and the PCI/PCI-E layout is ok for you, then i would also recommend the EVGA. A1 or T1 of course.
    I may catch hell fo this, but can you either tell me or point me in the direction of finding what the difference is between the A1 and T1 models?

    -Collin-
    I am like an alcoholic, but with motherboards.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    2,061
    Quote Originally Posted by bingo13 View Post
    Not bad advice actually....
    Bingo, why do you say that?

  5. #5
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Fayetteville, North Carolina.
    Posts
    1,476
    Quote Originally Posted by virtualrain View Post
    Bingo, why do you say that?
    I'm not bingo but i think he meant that the EVGA is a good board. Or it could have been sarcasm.
    Gigabyte Z68X UD7
    Intel Core i7 2600K (testing)
    16GB Mushkin Redline 17000 2133 1.65v
    EK, 3x120 Rad 2xMCP655
    Acer 1200w PSU
    2-128GB Samsung SSD RAID 0
    2-1TB Seagete 32mb RAID 0
    1-1TB Western Digital
    1- Plextor PX-B320SA Blue Ray
    1- Plextor PX-880SA 24x DVD/RW
    2- EVGA Nvidia GTX-480 SLI
    LG 30", Hanns G 28"

  6. #6
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    2,061
    Quote Originally Posted by nugzo View Post
    I'm not bingo but i think he meant that the EVGA is a good board. Or it could have been sarcasm.
    AFAIK, Bingo13 is a reviewer at AnandTech... I would like to know what he knows about this board.

    From what I've heard the quad-core overclocking and memory performance is not the best on this board but they are still working on bios tweaks - so there is still hope. If this hope has evaporated and/or there are new issues, then I'd like to know ASAP.

  7. #7
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    1,123
    Quote Originally Posted by virtualrain View Post
    AFAIK, Bingo13 is a reviewer at AnandTech... I would like to know what he knows about this board.

    From what I've heard the quad-core overclocking and memory performance is not the best on this board but they are still working on bios tweaks - so there is still hope. If this hope has evaporated and/or there are new issues, then I'd like to know ASAP.
    1. The quality of the board is excellent, all features work right out of the box, RAID, SLI, and audio are in total harmony.

    2. The board screams with a 2MB Cache C2D, but do not expect overclocking over 500FSB with them, the board can do it at low multipliers, but the strap change at 501 just kills performance. Right now, my board is extremely stable at 475~485FSB, anything higher is not possible except for a CPU-Z screen shot.

    3. The board had average memory performance when overclocking with the 4MB Cache C2D or Quad Cores, the EVGA has much better memory performance above 400FSB with these chips. There are also various FSB holes with these processors and particular memory settings. That said, DFI is working overtime on these issues.

    4. I really like the board, it just needs some TLC within the BIOS. If you have a Quad Core or 4MB Cache C2D and an EVGA board, do not switch yet if benchmarking is important to you.

  8. #8
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Mansfield TX
    Posts
    1,730
    Quote Originally Posted by bingo13 View Post
    1. The quality of the board is excellent, all features work right out of the box, RAID, SLI, and audio are in total harmony.

    2. The board screams with a 2MB Cache C2D, but do not expect overclocking over 500FSB with them, the board can do it at low multipliers, but the strap change at 501 just kills performance. Right now, my board is extremely stable at 475~485FSB, anything higher is not possible except for a CPU-Z screen shot.

    3. The board had average memory performance when overclocking with the 4MB Cache C2D or Quad Cores, the EVGA has much better memory performance above 400FSB with these chips. There are also various FSB holes with these processors and particular memory settings. That said, DFI is working overtime on these issues.

    4. I really like the board, it just needs some TLC within the BIOS. If you have a Quad Core or 4MB Cache C2D and an EVGA board, do not switch yet if benchmarking is important to you.
    Looks like I'll be sitting this board out after all. I've already got a fun board to bench my 2 mb cores that does 500FSB no tweaking & low nb volts. If it's not clocking 4 mb cores better than the evga then there's no advantage over the IN9 32Max either.
    Praetor
    » Intel i7 2600K 3103B306 » Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z » Asus GTX 470's TRi-SLI » Corsair Dominator GT CMT4GX3M2A2000C8 » Corsair Force F180 SSD » Corsair AX1200 PSU » Corsair 800D
    » Cooling : Swiftec Apogee XT » Swiftec MCP350-DDC1 w/XSPC Dual DDC Bay Reservoir » Swiftech MCR320-QP w/Scythe SlipStreams 110CFM

    The Yamato
    » Intel i7 920 3849B028 or i7 980X » Asus Rampage III Extreme Black Edition » Asus HD6970's QuadFireX or Asus GTX 570's 4way SLI » 6GB Corsair Dominator GT TR3X6G1866C7GTF » Corsair Force F180 SSD » Corsair AX1200 PSU » Microcool Banchetto 101
    » Cooling : Dragon F1 Extreme Edition(LN2) » Custom SS by RunMc »


  9. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Miami
    Posts
    54
    Quote Originally Posted by bingo13 View Post
    1. The quality of the board is excellent, all features work right out of the box, RAID, SLI, and audio are in total harmony.

    2. The board screams with a 2MB Cache C2D, but do not expect overclocking over 500FSB with them, the board can do it at low multipliers, but the strap change at 501 just kills performance. Right now, my board is extremely stable at 475~485FSB, anything higher is not possible except for a CPU-Z screen shot.

    3. The board had average memory performance when overclocking with the 4MB Cache C2D or Quad Cores, the EVGA has much better memory performance above 400FSB with these chips. There are also various FSB holes with these processors and particular memory settings. That said, DFI is working overtime on these issues.

    4. I really like the board, it just needs some TLC within the BIOS. If you have a Quad Core or 4MB Cache C2D and an EVGA board, do not switch yet if benchmarking is important to you.
    This? Bah, that's minor issues as far as i'm concerned. I've had an evga that's been giving me major problems and i'm looking to get off their platform.

    Quote Originally Posted by virtualrain View Post
    Why bother feeding the trolls. Ignore him.
    It didn't occur to me, Thanks.
    Last edited by scarface; 05-03-2007 at 02:23 PM.
    e6850 @ 3.6Ghz
    TT TRUE lapped
    evga 680i
    Lian Li PC-60B plus II
    2x eVGA 7950GT KO's
    2GB Ballistix DDR2-1066
    PCP&C 750w Silencer
    SB Audigy2 ZS
    20" SyncMaster 204B
    2x WD 160gig sataII's RAID-0
    My Heatware 25-0-0

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •