32m Low Clock Challenge

[dinos22]

wow FAST run there from a cut down intel CPU there

[luihed]

Those are some sick times NewBeatle

Wow I need to start benching this and learn, I hope you guys know my last post was a joke, I was just amaze at how far my time is compared to you guys....... How different is 32m vs 1m tweak wise?

[esdee]

very nice to have you in this thread NewBeetle .
(by the way, the last couple of weeks im driving a new beetle )

id be glad to compete with you in the 13.xx category!

[NewBeetle]

Those are some sick times NewBeatle

Wow I need to start benching this and learn, I hope you guys know my last post was a joke, I was just amaze at how far my time is compared to you guys....... How different is 32m vs 1m tweak wise?

Thank you for your toast. luihed-san.
The difference of tweaking between 1M and 32M is as follows.

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　1M　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　32M
MAXMEM　　　　　　　　　　　256MB　　　　　　　　　　　　 512MB
pagefile size　　　　　　　　 64-128MB　　　　　　　　　　256-512MB
modPI's directory　　　　 at boot drive　　　　　　　　at RAM-Disk
Special Methods　　　　　 none　　　　　　　　　　Copy-Waza & physical memory adjustment

Without these tweaking and methods, the score is about 20% slower.
Look this result with default setting (=without these tweaking and methods).

http://homepage2.nifty.com/NewBeetle..._CL3474mhz.png

very nice to have you in this thread NewBeetle .
(by the way, the last couple of weeks im driving a new beetle )

id be glad to compete with you in the 13.xx category!

Hello, esdee-san.
You are a New Beetle driver like me!?

Your PI is very fast and id be also glad to compete with you in 32m Low Clock Challenge!

DEWA DEWA ～ (it means "best regards" in Japan)

[eva2000]

wow newbeetle thanks for the tips

[Misko]

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　1M　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　32M
MAXMEM　　　　　　　　　　　256MB　　　　　　　　　　　　 512MB
pagefile size　　　　　　　　 64-128MB　　　　　　　　　　256-512MB
modPI's directory　　　　 at boot drive　　　　　　　　at RAM-Disk
Special Methods　　　　　 none　　　　　　　　　　Copy-Waza & physical memory adjustment

10x for posting some of your tweaks, I'm very interested in ram disk tweaking, by your opinion how much seconds is gain on 3600mhz (your excellent result) if spi directory is on ram disk or on hdd? I suppose you are using eram?

sve najbolje (it means dewa dewa in Serbia )

[Gautam]

Thanks so much for tips Newbeetle-san.

I'm curious about what you mean by "physical memory adjustment." ?

Do you have a link to download Autogear by any chance, and how do you use it? How large is your copy-waza size?

Thanks very much again!

[ncsa]

Khun Newbeetle-san khaawp khoon maak khrap

(Thank you very much)

[coop]

Thanks NewBeetle. I think alot of people are running 32m's now.

Do we need /want a section for fastest (closest to 12.xx) time @ 3600 or below?

[Gautam]

Considering the amount of times we got at 3.6GHz, I'd say yes.

Maybe even enough to start a sub 3600MHz 32M thread.

[eva2000]

Considering the amount of times we got at 3.6GHz, I'd say yes.

Maybe even enough to start a sub 3600MHz 32M thread.

yeah sub 3600mhz 32M is popular competition http://i4memory.com/showthread.php?p=64298#post64298



and http://www.thelab.gr/showthread.php?s=&threadid=32303


.

[Gautam]

Shouldn't "sub 3600MHz" mean sub 3600MHz?

[eva2000]

we're pretty flexible on that definition LOL

anyway table i have is for another thread i'm starting soon hehe

[dinos22]

Shouldn't "sub 3600MHz" mean sub 3600MHz?

it is i was just toying with the idea how far i am off sub-13m and george was working out efficiencies there

we're pretty serious about SPI


wow NewBeatle you are using a totally different approach in tweaks EEK >> more work and testing ahead i think

[over@locker886]

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　1M　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　32M
MAXMEM　　　　　　　　　　　256MB　　　　　　　　　　　　 512MB
pagefile size　　　　　　　　 64-128MB　　　　　　　　　　256-512MB
modPI's directory　　　　 at boot drive　　　　　　　　at RAM-Disk
Special Methods　　　　　 none　　　　　　　　　　Copy-Waza & physical memory adjustment

Without these tweaking and methods, the score is about 20% slower.
Look this result with default setting (=without these tweaking and methods).

http://homepage2.nifty.com/NewBeetle..._CL3474mhz.png

DEWA DEWA ～ (it means "best regards" in Japan)

First, Only I was 2 days offline, and I see lot of new post

Hello, NewBeetle-san!

This tweaks works well under win xp or win 2003?

Because I get faster spi if I used ramdisk for Spi 1M under win 2003.

Misko: I use too quad-gt, so we can resemble together results.

[Misko]

This tweaks works well under win xp or win 2003?

Because I get faster spi if I used ramdisk for Spi 1M under win 2003.

Misko: I use too quad-gt, so we can resemble together results.

I'm 99% sure that he is using 2k3, which ramdisk application u are using?

yours 32M score is really great under zero, so yes we can resemble together , but me and my Team must use XP , give us much better clock for CPU vs. 2k3

[kiwi]

Konnichiwa NewBeetle-san, your times are amazing

I also wonder what physical memory adjustment mean

[Misko]

one more advantage for me of using Abit is that when go sub zero perf number will not go down like on other boards, little explanation:

when using dlx on 3600 category competition, u are using 2:3 divider fsb is 400, and ram is 600, when u go sub zero it would be pretty much the same thing, maybe u will move few mhz but.... when using abit, on air it is 514 for both RAM and FSB, and when u go sub zero it would be 540+:



Do not watch result it is not good (it is 3rd in the world, but win wasn't so good) so my Team will heave boost in fsb and memory (that dlx users do not have)

[dinos22]

that's a killer CPU

what were your tube temps and core temps again and how close were you managing to keep the temps to

also what does that CPU do on dice

[Misko]

that's a killer CPU

what were your tube temps and core temps again and how close were you managing to keep the temps to

also what does that CPU do on dice

I have send u PM (because it would be off topic if we start discussion about it)

[Johnny Bravo]

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　 1M　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　 32M
MAXMEM　　　　　　　　　　　 256MB　　 　　　 512MB
pagefile size　　　　　　　　 64-128MB　　 　　　　　　　　256-512MB
modPI's directory　　　　 boot drive　　　　　　　　 RAM-Disk
Special Methods　　　　　 none　　　　　　　　　　 Copy-Waza & physical memory adjustment

Without these tweaking and methods, the score is about 20% slower.
Look this result with default setting (=without these tweaking and methods).

Hi NewBeetle impressive runs you have put in, I'm intrigued that your listed tweaks has included MAXMEM for the 32M runs. I have been doing some extensive testing of 32M runs (which can be found here) and have found adjusting MAXMEM to 400, 500 and 600 did not gain me anything in my runs. I wonder is there anything different in the way you are implementing this tweak? My method is as follows

Start -> run... "msconfig" The System Configuration Utility box will open up and you need to go to the "boot.ini" tab. Click "advanced options..." to bring up another box notice /MAXMEM is at the top with a number input beside it. Now here is where it gets vague. The majority say that for 32M calculations setting /MAXMEM to 600 works best, and for 1M calculations a values of 104. A bit of playing around with this value will be required but don't go crazy low or high as you may well bork your OS install.

is this the same as your method? One last thing, under "special methods" you list "physical memory adjustment" seeing how your already using MAXMEM to limit the size of the memory seen by windows what is this tweak doing?

John

[over@locker886]

I'm 99% sure that he is using 2k3, which ramdisk application u are using?

yours 32M score is really great under zero, so yes we can resemble together , but me and my Team must use XP , give us much better clock for CPU vs. 2k3

Ramdisk version: http://www.ramdisk.tk/

why xp give better clock? I read already somewhere, but I don't understand..

I will try sub 10s 9*570-580fsb, if mobo can..we beated 572FSB yet..

[Misko]

Ramdisk version: http://www.ramdisk.tk/

why xp give better clock? I read already somewhere, but I don't understand..

I will try sub 10s 9*570-580fsb, if mobo can..we beated 572FSB yet..

I don't know but in XP we can shot 1M 5480, with 2k3 max is 5400, similar with 32M, ~100mhz less dunno why Do u have best 3600 32M with quadGT can u try it? I'll be very interested to see that.

[NewBeetle]

Thank you for a lot of questions.
I'll answer the questions as much as possible.

10x for posting some of your tweaks, I'm very interested in ram disk tweaking, by your opinion how much seconds is gain on 3600mhz (your excellent result) if spi directory is on ram disk or on hdd? I suppose you are using eram?

sve najbolje (it means dewa dewa in Serbia )

Hello, Misko-san.
I tested it.
It increases for about five seconds on hdd.
And i am using "ERAM for Windows Ver 2.11".

Thanks so much for tips Newbeetle-san.

I'm curious about what you mean by "physical memory adjustment." ?

Do you have a link to download Autogear by any chance, and how do you use it? How large is your copy-waza size?

Thanks very much again!

Hello, Gautam-san,
When i adjust physical memory more under Windows, I use "MemEat" that reduces physical memory.
However, the effect is a little (about 0.5-1.0 second).
Look at this picture. if you are interested in it (Sorry in Japanese).



And a link to download Autogear is here.
http://www.vector.co.jp/soft/dl/win9.../se293319.html
But i don't explain it well, please see the image and understand what kind of software it is.
http://homepage2.nifty.com/NewBeetle/Autogear.png

My Copy-Waza size is "MAXMEM size + 100-200MB".
But, this size is not the best, and try variously, please.

First, Only I was 2 days offline, and I see lot of new post

Hello, NewBeetle-san!

This tweaks works well under win xp or win 2003?

Because I get faster spi if I used ramdisk for Spi 1M under win 2003.

Misko: I use too quad-gt, so we can resemble together results.

Hello, over@locker886-san.
I run SPI only under win 2003.
Sorry I can't answer your question.

Konnichiwa NewBeetle-san, your times are amazing

I also wonder what physical memory adjustment mean

Hello, kiwi-san.
When i adjust physical memory more under Windows, I use "MemEat" that reduces physical memory.
However, the effect is a little (about 0.5-1.0 second).

Hi NewBeetle impressive runs you have put in, I'm intrigued that your listed tweaks has included MAXMEM for the 32M runs. I have been doing some extensive testing of 32M runs (which can be found here) and have found adjusting MAXMEM to 400, 500 and 600 did not gain me anything in my runs. I wonder is there anything different in the way you are implementing this tweak? My method is as follows



is this the same as your method? One last thing, under "special methods" you list "physical memory adjustment" seeing how your already using MAXMEM to limit the size of the memory seen by windows what is this tweak doing?

John

Hello, Johnny Bravo-san.
I understand what you say and your question is very reasonable.

First question,
I think MAXMEM shows the effect by combining with COPY-WAZA.
My Copy-Waza size is "MAXMEM size + 100-200MB".
Without MAXMEM, Copy-Waza size will be very large.
And there is no difference in MAXMEM tweaking itself.

Second question,
I use the tool named "MEMEAT" to adjust the physical memory more in detail after physical memory is roughly adjusted with MAXMEM.
However, the effect is a little (about 0.5-1.0 second).
I'm sorry I can't explain well any more.

DEWA DEWA ～

[hadji_a]

for the 15.xx category.