MMM
Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: C2D: are they really degrading with >1.55-1.6V?

Threaded View

  1. #3
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    2,105
    Quote Originally Posted by Ace-a-Rue View Post
    anything over max rated vcore is risky...now...if you have the money to replace it then don't worry about it.

    i paid $890 for Q6600...i hate to burn it up just trying to hold 400 FSb with 1.55+ vcore when i can do 380 FSB with 1.48 vcore...tiny drop in performance is 'ok' with me...there is always someone out there to beat your overclock!
    I am not suggesting the the 20mhz is worth killing a cpu...certainly not for me

    My point of this thread, is there have been multiple reports of failing cpus(not a complete death but a degradation with "high vcore" but it has not been clear to me from the reports as to what people used to confirm stablility to start with

    My sense is 1.65v is a NO-NO and people have seen issues with use for as little as a week


    1.55v..seems pretty safe from most accounts and usage..although I have no idea if this is the bios setting or DMM measurement

    1.6v...just not sure
    Last edited by nealh; 04-21-2007 at 01:10 PM.
    My Heat
    i5 2500k @4.5ghz Raystorm
    Asus P8Z68-V Pro/Gen3 16gb(4x4) G.Skill PC12800 Ripjaws X
    x1900xt MCW60
    Rad: Thermochill PA120.3 3YL SL/ Pump: DDC2 w/ Petra's top 7/16in ID masterkleer
    Corsair 120gb Force GT SSD/ 1TB WD Black Caviar SATA
    X-Fi music/SH-203B/H62L/LH-20A1L
    Corsair HX620w /Acer AL2223W/modded TJ07

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •