Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 81

Thread: Intel IHS removal... Any reason boiling water couldn't be used?

  1. #51
    IT Engineer in the making
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Former Kingdom of Bavaria
    Posts
    2,094
    Quote Originally Posted by leojharris
    as far as an alternate method for exposing the cpu, could you use a circular sander disc with fairly high grit sand paper (1000) or so ... and sand down until your completely through the IHS and even a tad into the silicon of the cpu (to clean it of any solder)?

    would that leave too much of the IHS around the sides and perhaps cause shorts?
    With 1000 grit sandpaper you'd wait hours for it to sand through the whole IHS. I'd say that this method doesn't really sound too good. Better get rid of the whole IHS at once. But that's just my .
    Quote from one of our professors:
    "Reality is hiding in the imaginary part."

  2. #52
    The Blue Dolphin
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,816
    Nice work

    I have a hotplate/magnetic stirrer combi with 0-350C temperature control. Guess I found a good use for it now
    Blue Dolphin Reviews & Guides

    Blue Reviews:
    Gigabyte G-Power PRO CPU cooler
    Vantec Nexstar 3.5" external HDD enclosure
    Gigabyte Poseidon 310 case


    Blue Guides:
    Fixing a GFX BIOS checksum yourself


    98% of the internet population has a Myspace. If you're part of the 2% that isn't an emo bastard, copy and paste this into your sig.

  3. #53
    INTEL inside
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Québec, Canada
    Posts
    3,258
    haha, crazy
    retired computer enthusiast

  4. #54
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    445
    since this seems to be an active thread, i'll post my question here. i removed my ihs but didn't get the results i wanted, still a very large 10C+ difference between cores. is it possible the core itself is warped? the as5 footprint seems like it's touching all over, but the pressure isn't even i suppose.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ket
    Erm, its a little weird how a lot of peeps dont have a case for their PC.....essentially thats a cheat because in a case things always run hotter, yet ppl will claim their OC "stable"

    Sorry, in my book nothing is valid unless its in a case, and hence, a "normal" environment, by all means go nuts on cooling not a problem, but an open top setup with an OC ppl claim to be stable when in all reality inside a PC it probably won't be? Thats just unacceptable to me.

  5. #55
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    279
    Quote Originally Posted by celemine1Gig
    With 1000 grit sandpaper you'd wait hours for it to sand through the whole IHS. I'd say that this method doesn't really sound too good. Better get rid of the whole IHS at once. But that's just my .
    i mean while using a high powered circular sander that i'd apply the IHS to. perhaps would have to move back to 800 or something ... but using a powered disc, the work could go fairly quick.

    seems like there would be too much scrap metal left hanging on the sides, though ...
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    2700K @ 5.0ghz / SLI GTX 670's / 16GB Mushkin / H100

  6. #56
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    89
    I hate to do this to you guys, but I do not have my idle/load numbers from before my experiment. I can guesstimate that I got about 5C off my load numbers and almost nothing off my idle numbers as read by core temp. Overall whether you're better off lapping or removing IHS is totally up to you. I honestly don't think this is that much riskier, and they both void your warranty. This gives slightly better results by a couple degrees (I'm using an APOGEE, under better water, the difference might be more pronounced), but the choice is up to each individual user. I'd love to see other people try this and report their results though. I have an X6800, but I don't know if I can remove the IHS on this one because it might need to go back where it came from.


    It looks like this was moved to help and support... Weird...
    Last edited by Methylphenidate; 12-16-2006 at 04:40 PM.

  7. #57
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    92
    Quote Originally Posted by ineedaname
    I would suggest using distilled water just to make sure no minerals dry on your chip to reduce possible damage. That's if you don't use the pot method.

    If you are worrying about minerals, you would not use the pot - but what else is there to use? . By the way, you should use de-ionised water to start with (those they use in the fab), distilled water is not good enough.
    Last edited by zerolise; 12-16-2006 at 10:54 PM.
    First successful overclock: Intel 8088,10MHz@12.5MHz
    Multiplier? What Multipler? Desolder and replace the crystal!
    Benchmark? Or did you mean "Landmark"? The year was 1985!!!

    Accidentally, this small man has become a part of the legend... (Added Dec 16, 2006)
    Toms Hardware Guide (Dec 11, 2006 - http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/12/...-guide-part-1/): ""Overclocking" may in fact pre-date PCs, going back to the days of simpler devices, but legends of 8 MHz 8088 processors overclocked to 12 MHz via a simple change in clock crystal started a phenomenon."


  8. #58
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    92
    Even when the IHS is out, there is still significant thermal resistance between the core and the heat sink (or cooling block). Thinking extreme and being irrational, has anyone tried welding the cores (or the IHS) onto the heat sink (or the cooling block) to improve heat conduction, in this way, there is no need for any freaking thermal compound ... LOL.
    First successful overclock: Intel 8088,10MHz@12.5MHz
    Multiplier? What Multipler? Desolder and replace the crystal!
    Benchmark? Or did you mean "Landmark"? The year was 1985!!!

    Accidentally, this small man has become a part of the legend... (Added Dec 16, 2006)
    Toms Hardware Guide (Dec 11, 2006 - http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/12/...-guide-part-1/): ""Overclocking" may in fact pre-date PCs, going back to the days of simpler devices, but legends of 8 MHz 8088 processors overclocked to 12 MHz via a simple change in clock crystal started a phenomenon."


  9. #59
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    89
    I hope you mean solder, and not weld... You would still have to contend with the poor thermal conductivity of solder, which would likely be worse than thermal compound.

  10. #60
    IT Engineer in the making
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Former Kingdom of Bavaria
    Posts
    2,094
    If you are worried about the two cores not being of the same height, thus causing "bad" contact to the heatsink, you could always do the following:

    WARNING! THIS IS NOT RECOMMENDED, SO DO THIS AT YOUR OWN RISK!

    You could take for example 1mm thick steel and fabricate a narrow frame, which runs along the edges of the CPU (not the cores, but the green package ).
    Now if you lap the whole CPU with the frame in place, you'll get both cores down to nearly exactly the same height and flatness. The hand lapping will lead to some rounding on the edges of the steel frame, but it's OK that way. This ensures that the middle, where the cores are located is slightly higher than the edges, hence giving perfect contact between the cores and the heatsink, instead of only having the whole pressure on the edges.

    Just one idea. There sure are other ways. It's only how I would try to improve contact, as you don't seem to be happy with what you got ATM.
    Quote from one of our professors:
    "Reality is hiding in the imaginary part."

  11. #61
    -100c Club Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    England
    Posts
    1,422
    lol you crazy soab

  12. #62
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    92
    Quote Originally Posted by Methylphenidate
    I hope you mean solder, and not weld... You would still have to contend with the poor thermal conductivity of solder, which would likely be worse than thermal compound.
    No. I really meant weld... it produces the best thermal conductivity, but I reckon that this is a crazy idea, unless the heatsink (or water block) is part of the wafer substrate to begin with - that can only happen (if ever) in a fab.

    By the way, if soldered properly, a joint would product good thermal conductivity too. 65% Sn and 35% Pb is all metal and definitely has lower thermal resistance than thermal compound, which is either silicon based or at best silicon loaded with a small amount of silver (and sold for lots of $$$)
    First successful overclock: Intel 8088,10MHz@12.5MHz
    Multiplier? What Multipler? Desolder and replace the crystal!
    Benchmark? Or did you mean "Landmark"? The year was 1985!!!

    Accidentally, this small man has become a part of the legend... (Added Dec 16, 2006)
    Toms Hardware Guide (Dec 11, 2006 - http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/12/...-guide-part-1/): ""Overclocking" may in fact pre-date PCs, going back to the days of simpler devices, but legends of 8 MHz 8088 processors overclocked to 12 MHz via a simple change in clock crystal started a phenomenon."


  13. #63
    IT Engineer in the making
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Former Kingdom of Bavaria
    Posts
    2,094
    Quote Originally Posted by bazx
    lol you crazy soab
    I'd prefer creative soab.
    Quote from one of our professors:
    "Reality is hiding in the imaginary part."

  14. #64
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Lakeland,FL
    Posts
    2,536
    wow...waiting to see some results...
    750W Thermaltake Modular PSU
    DFI UT X58-T3eH8
    Core i7 920 @ 20 X 200 1.325V
    CORSAIR XMS3 DHX 4GB (2 x 2GB) DDR3 1600
    768 MB EVGA 8800GTX
    1 X 36GB WD Raptor
    2 X 150GB WD RAPTORS
    1 X SpinPoint P Series SP2504C 250GB
    1 X Maxtor 6L300S0 300GB
    16 X NEC DVD Burner
    7 120mm Yate Loon LED Intake Fan
    4 120MM Yate Loon Exhaust Fan
    28" HANNSPREE Monitor


    Watercooling Loop:

    1 X PA120.3
    1 X PA120.2
    2 X Laing DDC's w/EK-DDC Dual Turbo Top
    7 X Yate Loon Blue LED Intake Fans
    4 X Yate Loon Blue LED Exhaust Fans
    1 X Swiftech GTZ
    1 X GPU EK Fullcover Waterblock
    1 X XSPC Dual Bay Reservoir 5.25" with Bubble Window

  15. #65
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    89
    Alright I've got some results for you guys, but I don't have anything but approximate numbers from before removal, so hopefully someone with an APOGEE and a similar water loop can give us some load numbers with IHS

    CPU 1.512V as read by eVGA bios on 680i board. Supposedly it's one of the more accurate boards out there in this regard

    core temp reads cores 1&2 as 75C and cores 3&4 as 71C

    nVidia monitor reads CPU temp as 62C

    CPU is clocked at 12x277 for 3.33GHz.

  16. #66
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    ithaca, ny
    Posts
    2,431
    Quote Originally Posted by zerolise
    No. I really meant weld... it produces the best thermal conductivity, but I reckon that this is a crazy idea, unless the heatsink (or water block) is part of the wafer substrate to begin with - that can only happen (if ever) in a fab.

    By the way, if soldered properly, a joint would product good thermal conductivity too. 65% Sn and 35% Pb is all metal and definitely has lower thermal resistance than thermal compound, which is either silicon based or at best silicon loaded with a small amount of silver (and sold for lots of $$$)
    lol I think the point being made is the temps of welding!!

  17. #67
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    89
    I think part of what's making my chip run so hot is the fact that it's a relatively early engineering sample. I have an ES Q6600 coming that I might have been able to get better results on, except that my board is worthless for Kentsfield FSB overclocking (680i reference)

  18. #68
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Finland, Eura
    Posts
    1,744
    Well I might do that on my E6600


    http://mato78.com - Finnish PC Hardware news & reviews
    BulldogPO @ Twitter


  19. #69
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    536
    Nice thread. Neat guide here.

  20. #70
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    165
    If i'm gonna remover a ihs, then i wil use that guide..

  21. #71
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Sydney, Oz.
    Posts
    850
    Quote Originally Posted by Methylphenidate View Post
    I hate to do this to you guys, but I do not have my idle/load numbers from before my experiment. I can guesstimate that I got about 5C off my load numbers and almost nothing off my idle numbers as read by core temp. Overall whether you're better off lapping or removing IHS is totally up to you. I honestly don't think this is that much riskier, and they both void your warranty. This gives slightly better results by a couple degrees (I'm using an APOGEE, under better water, the difference might be more pronounced), but the choice is up to each individual user. I'd love to see other people try this and report their results though. I have an X6800, but I don't know if I can remove the IHS on this one because it might need to go back where it came from.


    It looks like this was moved to help and support... Weird...
    no this is better than lapping and no voided warranty as with lapping when you stick IHS back on with epoxy. they will never check it. I say well done and also say big thumbs down to all who said blah blah you were warned etc. if someone wants to try delidding cpus etc then they should only be congratulated not put down by those of you who wont risk it. dont like it, dont do it but dont post negative remarks for those of us with balls.
    my 10 cents.

    and btw B1s are hot steppings like B0s. B3 ES and retail usually run a little cooler.

  22. #72
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    136
    Its easy to say things like that after all goes well... After you've seen the cat's balls, saying that he is male... its an easy thing.

  23. #73
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Sydney, Oz.
    Posts
    850
    Quote Originally Posted by the highlander View Post
    Its easy to say things like that after all goes well... After you've seen the cat's balls, saying that he is male... its an easy thing.
    nope. i delidded my 8800gtx without fear. then killed it for another reason, ramsink shorting components. only reason im not doing the qx6700 is becuase the TT wont reach the cores and dont really have stuff to mod it. might delid it once my prommy is regassed and ready though.

  24. #74
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    New Hampshire (USA)
    Posts
    998
    and btw B1s are hot steppings like B0s. B3 ES and retail usually run a little cooler.
    Do you have any info on B2 steppings, like how they compare temperature wise to B0's, B1's, and B3's? Thanks for your help!
    Asus Maximus III Formula (2001)
    Intel i7 860 (L924B516)
    Noctua D14
    Corsairs CMG4GX3M2A2000C2 (2 x 2GB) RAM
    eVGA GTX480
    DD-H20
    BIX GTX360
    MCP35X PWM
    Creative X-Fi Titanium PCI-e
    LG GGC-H20L Blu-Ray
    Toughpower 850w Modular
    GSkill Phoenix Pro SSD 120GB


    HEAT

  25. #75
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Slovakia Europe
    Posts
    119
    Could you post some photos .... with naked cpu in mobo ... something like this
    // E6600@3900~1.5v // Asus P5K DLX //A-DATA 2GB EE // Samsung F1 1TB // ASUS X1900XTX~735/1680 // Corsair HX520 // Thermaltake Armor VA8000SWA // W. COOLING ~ D-Tek FuZion & Viscool V3 GPU & Swiftech MCP655 & 2x Swiftech MCR-320QP //

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •