Well, I just tested the the 2 scenarios you describe and 400,1:1 did run slightly faster memory throughput than 319,4:5 but I think it's more to do with the processor running at 3.6 GHz instead of 2.88 GHz
Also, in order to do a valid test, you have to run the memory in single channel mode (1 stick) otherwise the effects of running both channels skews the results.
[/QUOTE]
Gee thanks.![]()





Reply With Quote
Bookmarks