Quote:Originally Posted by TWY
I see.. Wonder if it has any hardware enhancements for Kentsfield, etc. Intel XBX1 and XBX2 had some changes in traces, wonder if it's the same for the 1.03G vs. 1.04G on the P5W.
IIRC the newer 975X chipsets are more rectangular in shape (only seen where the factory/year/week code is 36**), whereas the older ones are square (I've seen L5**). If I'm not wrong the rectangular ones can clock better with lower vMCH? The 975XBX2 should be using the rectangular ones. Could anyone confirm this?
http://resources.vr-zone.com/Shamino/badx2/20.jpg
XBX1's chipset vs. the XBX2's chipset
How i said in the other post:
I´m new here, but i´m reading yours for a long time. My P5W is a 1.04G rev, 1.85v MCH and BX2. I´m using 1901. Is fine for me. No problems yet. My config is 400x8 1:1 with 6400 L629A817 with 1.35 in bios and 1.55v MCH. Stable in orthos and OCCT. I´m using 4 sticks KVR ECC with Promos IC´s.
Conclusion: is 1.04g rev beter for oc with new chipset rev??
Bookmarks