hahaha, yes. i miss that 146
and i guess i've just seen too many chips in the 200 range that clock surprisingly well to really be in support of the lower batch number = better oc'er..
your chips don't count cause you have special resources![]()
hahaha, yes. i miss that 146
and i guess i've just seen too many chips in the 200 range that clock surprisingly well to really be in support of the lower batch number = better oc'er..
your chips don't count cause you have special resources![]()
Got a fan over those memory sticks? No? Well get to it before you kill them
Actually, if you're talking about dual cores in the 200 range, then you'd be correct as IIRC, the number of dual core cpu's able to be cut from a single wafer tops out ~200....so the early 200's would be somewhat comparable to the lower numbered cpus......Originally Posted by ozzimark
![]()
Bookmarks