World First 600MHz FSB Achieved !! Bravo ~ GIGABYTE GA-965P-DQ6

**Ad1tya** · 09-05-2006, 03:26 AM

guys.... just look at the SPi window. just below the menu and near the upper part of the scrool bar. notice anything?

regards,
karan

**dinos22** · 09-05-2006, 03:28 AM

Originally Posted by goldenfrag

guys.... just look at the SPi window. just below the menu and near the upper part of the scrool bar. notice anything?

regards,
karan

that's normal

**lookmomnobrains** · 09-05-2006, 03:41 AM

nice to see a steping 6 rev B2 es chip lmao

edit: but seeing the later post it must be a bug.... sorry

**viddax^2** · 09-05-2006, 03:42 AM

That cant be true. I got 480 1:1 with F3a putting loads of Volts to eveything, Vmch and Vfsb, F4b didnt even post @ 380 for me...

I also say its a fake.

**zbogorgon** · 09-05-2006, 04:02 AM

the left cpuz showing memory tag is completely differentn, different texture, different color, was screened on different comp, that the right ones.

**MrBean** · 09-05-2006, 04:05 AM

Sad really when a 975 chipset with E6600 at 380fsb (3.33gig) beat you by more than 2secs in SuperPI?

**Sneaky** · 09-05-2006, 04:17 AM

Originally Posted by lookmomnobrains

nice to see a steping 6 rev B2 es chip lmao

LOL, OWNED!

nice try kid, but even the cleanest photoshop job never passes the Xtreme test by thoes who know what everything is capable of

and if 600 fsb was ever going to happen, it sure as hell wouldn't be on a gigabyte board... or without vmods for the matter

when such a significant point is reached with nothing but a screenshot, no one believes it, its as simple as that - validation via CPUz is all you need, and too bad you can't photoshop that

**highoctane** · 09-05-2006, 04:22 AM

Awefully slow time for that mhz and fsb speed.

**Bromptoners** · 09-05-2006, 04:33 AM

Well guys, I guess I have some new benchmarks for you all. Whereas, there's some points I will have to clearify.
1) X6800 showing E6200, I found out it's a bug at CPU-Z 1.36. I've turned back to 1.35 and the readings are correct.
2) I tried summitting that cpuz.cvf file for validation with 1.35, and the site says that my CPU-z version is old. But when I tried using 1.36 cvf file, it says the system is not fully supported...

So.. I'm too wanted to get my results validated, as it's my first "world-record " (??) result. I'm quite excited about this, but who can help me contact the CPU-z guys??

Here's the new benchmarks I'd re-done again.. with CPU-z 1.35

Sandra 2007 CPU Benchmark_1

Sandra 2007 CPU Benchmark_2

Sandra 2007 Memory Benchmark

Lastly... the only photo editing software I know is "Paint" from Windows..
I'll try to get my results validated.. Here's the output txt file~~

----------------------
CPU-Z version 1.35
----------------------

CPUID Output
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Number of CPUs 2

CPU #1
APIC ID 0
Name Intel Core 2 Extreme X6800
Code name Conroe
Specification Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU X6800 @ 2.93GHz (Engineering Sample)
Family/Model/Stepping 6F6
Extended Family/Model 6/F
Package LGA 775 (0h)
Core Stepping B2
Technology 65nm
Instructions Sets MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4, EM64T
Features NX, VT
Clock Speed 3600.1 MHz
Clock multiplier x6.0
Multiplier range 6 - 6
Front Side Bus Frequency 600.0 MHz
Bus Speed 2400.0 MHz
Stock frequency 2933 MHz
L1 Data Cache 32 KBytes, 8-way set associative, 64 Bytes line size
L1 Instruction Cache 32 KBytes, 8-way set associative, 64 Bytes line size
L2 Cache 4096 KBytes, 16-way set associative, 64 Bytes line size
L2 Speed 3600.1 MHz (Full)
L2 Location On Chip
L2 Data Prefetch Logic yes
L2 Bus Width 256 bits

**Gam3Ra** · 09-05-2006, 04:38 AM

**lookmomnobrains** · 09-05-2006, 04:41 AM

Bromptoners.... Nice to see a steping 6 rev B2 ES chip lmao

edit: but seeing the later post it must be a bug.... sorry

**taemun** · 09-05-2006, 04:41 AM

If anyone is interested, the checksum from the first post is one of these:
B8C68D3A
B0C68D3A
B8C60D3A
B0C60D3A

The 8's and 0's are identical to that number of pixels...

t

edit: oops, the first char is a B lol
edit2: eh none of them verify anyways ... bogus shot? dunno ... I'm pretty sure that I'm right now...

**bing** · 09-05-2006, 04:44 AM

Ok, since CPUZ isn't validating, now try PCMARK and get your ORB thingee online, that is the other way.

**kiwi** · 09-05-2006, 04:44 AM

Well, at least Pi checksum is correct

taemun:

No, those checksums are not correct

**Pt1t** · 09-05-2006, 05:06 AM

Lastly... the only photo editing software I know is "Paint" from Windows..

Paint ROX

**ea6gka** · 09-05-2006, 05:06 AM

wtf is goin on ? are these fakes or what?

**umbre_tombetoil** · 09-05-2006, 05:11 AM

Originally Posted by ea6gka

wtf is goin on ? are these fakes or what?

Guess ....

**Dumo** · 09-05-2006, 05:17 AM

Is this the same result? http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...=1#post1701062

**Ronnie** · 09-05-2006, 05:20 AM

**DEVIL K-ce** · 09-05-2006, 05:28 AM

Originally Posted by Dumo

Is this the same result? http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...=1#post1701062

Yes

No moded mobo and FSB 600

**Raiden Zero** · 09-05-2006, 05:30 AM

Originally Posted by Dumo

Is this the same result? http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...=1#post1701062

so it's no fake, but a stolen screen ^^

sry about that... i was just way too confused

great result.

**Pt1t** · 09-05-2006, 05:38 AM

Originally Posted by Raiden Zero

so it's no fake, but a stolen screen ^^

it isnt coolaler ftp.

**i found nemo** · 09-05-2006, 05:38 AM

someone ban this guy

**boblemagnifique** · 09-05-2006, 05:40 AM

Originally Posted by Pt1t

it isnt coolaler ftp.

Yes the topic on Forum Coolaler

**K.I.T.T.** · 09-05-2006, 05:40 AM

Originally Posted by Raiden Zero

so it's no fake, but a stolen screen ^^

*Checks out other thread*

*Scratches head*

*Comes back here*

Now I'm really confused

Thread: World First 600MHz FSB Achieved !! Bravo ~ GIGABYTE GA-965P-DQ6

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Rate This Thread

Display

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions