MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 123

Thread: I think core temp.... is officially buggered.

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    408
    For me, CoreTemp is the most trustworthy tool for actual die-temp reading. A very good way to check is to undervolt your CPU at stock or even below-stock speed. Say, try something like 1.2V @2.0GHz. You will get below 30C idle and below 40C load temp, or something like that. And as frequency goes up, and as you give more voltages the CoreTemp responses to the change very sensitively.
    I don't check my PMs very often.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    17,242
    Quote Originally Posted by lopri
    For me, CoreTemp is the most trustworthy tool for actual die-temp reading. A very good way to check is to undervolt your CPU at stock or even below-stock speed. Say, try something like 1.2V @2.0GHz. You will get below 30C idle and below 40C load temp, or something like that. And as frequency goes up, and as you give more voltages the CoreTemp responses to the change very sensitively.
    i had 40C load temps overclocked to 3.2GHz stock vcore on one motherboard and 52C-55C on the other using core temp with tons of remounts on both motherboards >>>how do you explain that

    motherboards were both Gigabyte DS3
    Team.AU
    Got tube?
    GIGABYTE Australia
    Need a GIGABYTE bios or support?



Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •