Quote Originally Posted by chew* View Post
I would call it more of a report than a review and i really hate doing videos but there is so much to cover and some of it you just need to see to understand. Conveying it through a forum post will be hard. It will be off the cuff no editing no rgb disco lights humour just raw and uncut straight to the point as always and most likely a bunch of small clips covering various aspects.

I am not really aware of to many big density kits that are not bdie.

Really went above my means on this one financially and capability? wise. Originally had no intentions of working on it as I find myself at a loss to fully utilize it (TR and 64gb). I had discussed this with AMD already.

Was asked to by a vendor or shall i say an overclocker i respect who works for one.

I think i have the real world use or shall I say user that can actually show real world use covered now. I will do my report. Pretune it then pass it off and see what he comes up with.

This is the best I can really come up with for the OC community/workstation crowd which I think its marketed more towards.
Before you pass it off,
BF3/4/1 is not HT/SMT aware but can utilize 13 threads or 8cores 100%
Fluidmark can use 12cores 100%
remember physx tanking with amd cpu, but what about now