MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 560

Thread: AMD Bulldozer Thread

Threaded View

  1. 10-12-2011, 04:19 PM #11
    Brice MJ
    Brice MJ is offline
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    73
    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    So they switch from 980x to 2600K to 2500K comparisons whenever they see they would get hammered ? Way to go AMD...
    Slide in 1100T in those benchmarks and see Zambezi being massive 10% faster with 33% more "cores" ,15% more clockspeed and 8MB more cache. They failed with Bulldozer on desktop,period. They enter year 2012 with Bobcat level of IPC,going backwards in time instead jumping over K10. Llano's core is a speed train compared to chariot of bulldozer
    I really hope after this fail you finally learn a lesson: Dont overhype AMD products before launch anymore. Barcelona wasnt 20-30% faster than Intel CPC, neither Zambezi does 11 pts in Cinebench 11.5, but AMD never said that.
    Last edited by Brice MJ; 10-12-2011 at 04:21 PM.
    JF-AMD / Hans de Vries / informal posting: IPC increases!!!!!!! How many times did I tell you!!!

    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    .....}
    until (12th October 2011)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules